...

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Gridley

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

The skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier specialize in slip and fall accidents, consistently delivering exceptional legal support to those around Gridley who have been impacted by such harrowing incidents. Familiarity with Illinois law is a core strength of the team; in fact, your cause is entrusted to seasoned professionals equipped to handle complex cases seamlessly. Whether standing up against large corporations or negotiating fair settlements from insurance companies, each task executed by Carlson Bier’s lawyers reflects top-notch strategizing and preparation, putting their clients’ best interests at heart. Moreover, they understand that every case requires an individualized approach – one aligned perfectly with your specific situation’s requirements for successful outcomes. At Carlson Bier you’re not simply obtaining a lawyer for a slip and fall accident claim; instead you’re engaging dedicated allies fighting persistently for your right to just compensation while easing the burden of legal complexities.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Gridley Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we take the time to fully comprehend the complexities of slip and fall accidents. Our dedication to intense legal research aims to provide you with comprehensive information about such incidents in Illinois.

In a world laden with potential hazards, unfortunate mishaps like slip and fall accidents are highly prevalent. Held under the umbrella term ‘premises liability’, these incidents refer to situations where an individual slips or trips on another person’s land or premises, resulting in injury. While simplicity implies that blame can readily be accounted for, such cases frequently involve intricate legal technicalities due to shared responsibility between involved parties.

The leading cause of non-fatal injuries for all age groups throughout America remains falls; this is indicative of their common occurrence across all spaces – from icy driveways at home during wintry seasons, slippery supermarket floors during cleanups to construction sites with poor safety measures implemented.

Key points denoting whether your slip and fall accident is eligible for a lawsuit include:

• The property owner must have created the hazardous condition.

• The premise should have been negligently maintained or cleaned.

• A reasonable person taking precaution would identify the location as potentially risky.

• Evidence suggesting that the owner knew but neglected mitigation efforts towards evident hazards.

It is crucial to remember that proving negligence forms an instrumental part of litigation services. Herein lies our role as personal injury attorneys – presenting your case persuasively through suitable evidence gathering methods including fact-based resources from trusted agencies e.g., medical professionals’ reports post-accident detailing severity, photos taken immediately after incident at accident site providing undisputed proof of hazard involving negligence followed by witness statements supporting your claim etc.

Insurance companies often downplay victims’ claims leaving them confused and demotivated due to lack of accurate knowledge about their entitled rights within law’s perimeter. This makes guidance-oriented content indispensable especially since most ill-informed victims often settle for low insurance offerings tarnishing future prospects substantially further convoluting their journey towards justice. Our expert attorney conglomeration’s focus lies in prepping clientele with informed knowledge to handle such instances smoothly without panic-induced dependency on insurance providers.

Additionally, if you believe that the accident occurred due to defective or inadequate property design, it is pertinent to seek immediate legal aid. Ancient laws dictating premises liability held the belief that visitors should take care whereas current Illinois laws stand at owner/occupier’s responsibility for ensuring premises safety leading us into a ‘duty of reasonable care’ era – an aspect we as proficient lawyers guide claims through.

Dissemination of useful content focused on personal injury laws specialised tailoring around slip and fall accidents forms our forte aiming at equipping claimants amidst the grim reality of legal complexities involved in these proceedings efficiently.

Our goal extends beyond providing quality legal representation; we aim to be a guiding beacon for individuals left hapless post-accidents – helping them become aware, prepared and resilient while pursuing rightful compensation.

Lastly, understand that your situation holds its unique set of merits deserving individualized attention rather than generic advice; hence it becomes absolutely vital obtaining estimations regarding case worth coming from qualified experienced professionals only instead of relying upon automated tools or preliminary Internet searches. At Carlson Bier, we provide exactly this – comprehensive consultation along with accurate evaluations demystifying lawsuit complexities enabling clients’ best shot at desired results beginning right from litigation initiation to suit closure navigating gracefully alongside our expert personal injury attorneys’ team.

Click on the button below to solve your queries pertaining your case value seeking well-informed guidance aiding fair resolution pursuit making way for deserved restitution addressing all assertive quotients within suitable timeframes diligently.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gridley Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Gridley

Areas of Practice in Gridley

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering specialist legal advice for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal advice for patients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing specialist legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Slip Incidents

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Offering legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Crash

Providing professional legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to offering professional legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and professional legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Committed to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer