FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Gurnee

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the distressing ordeal of dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier diligently serves as your ally for legal recourse in Illinois. Our attorney group is renowned for our steadfast commitment to pursuing justice and optimal compensation in such traumatic incidents. Led by experienced personal injury lawyers, we are adept at deciphering complex regulations related to dog bite injuries so you don’t have to. No matter the complexity or urgency of your case, trust Carlson Bier’s exceptional competency as crucial reasons why we should be your preferred choice when seeking legal advice. We understand these situations cultivate tremendous physical and emotional anguish; thus, our specialized team is ready to guide you every step of the way towards securing deserved recovery claims without delay or added burden on your part. Choose Carlson Bier; not only do you receive unparalleled counsel on dog bite injury laws in Illinois but also relentless representation that invariably puts your wellbeing first.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Gurnee Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical trauma that can result from dog bite injuries. Being your trusted personal injury law firm in Illinois, we commit to providing exceptional representation and assistance throughout the legal process surrounding such unfortunate incidences.

Dog bites may seem simple, but they often involve intricate legal aspects that demand an expert’s eye. The complex nature of these cases calls for a specialized understanding of various components including medical issues related to rabies or infections, psychological distress especially in cases involving children, local animal laws, as well as homeowners’ insurance policies.

Our team at Carlson Bier brings to bear extensive experience dealing with dog bite incidents. We stay apprised with the multi-faceted nature of laws pertaining to dog bites in our capacity as personal injury attorneys:

– Dog owners are usually held accountable for their pets – Illinois is a strict liability state when considering dog attacks or any damages caused by animals.

– Leash rules play a pivotal role – Violation of leash rules enhances the chances of holding dog owners legally responsible for inflicted injuries.

– It is significant whether the dog has been deemed ‘vicious’ or ‘dangerous’ before – A record of prior harm could bolster your claim against parties involved.

– Understanding homeowner’s insurance policies relating to pet-related injuries; most often they provide coverage for such injuries unless explicitly excluded.

While many people try handling such claims without professional help, understanding all that might factor into it isn’t something one can attain overnight. That’s where we step in – here at Carlson Bier; our mission lies in making sure each client fully comprehends the whys and hows pertaining to their situation while ensuring maximum compensation under applicable law.

Notably – No two injury cases are identical; values accorded depend on a myriad factors like severity of wounds suffered from the event(s), what kind, and if there exists permanent damage or disfigurement resulting thereof. Other critical aspects include present and future medical expenses, loss of earning capacity for significant periods owing to absence from work, among other variables.

Victims undergoing such distressing episodes most times don’t even realize the various dimensions holding potential compensation rights. For example, did you know that under Illinois law one could claim not only actual injuries but also mental anguish induced by associated fright or nervous shock during a dog bite incident? This emphasizes the need for legal guidance – where we at Carlson Bier specialize in every nitty gritty detail so our clients do not have to.

Additionally, expert legal representation becomes essential when dealing with insurance companies looking to mitigate your claim’s worth. They often attempt to utilize statements made against your interest triggering inappropriate settlements. Carlsson Bier stands firm ensuring victims receive what they truly deserve with no compromise on their rights!

Our goal is simple – providing comprehensive empathetic representation while aggressively protecting each client’s interests and well-being with particular emphasis on walking them through detailed aspects of personal injury claims resulting from dog bites.

You’ve come this far and taken a giant leap in understanding how crucial having competent legal advice becomes while dealing with dog bite incidents in Illinois; why stop now? Don’t leave anything to chance – Your compensation could be more than you think! Click on the button below to find out just how much your case might be worth – Let our dedicated professionals at Carlson Bier help you secure it! Remember—our mission lies in going all-in securing justice served per rightful entitlements under law ensuring maximum possible compensation for all related damages suffered.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Gurnee Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Gurnee

Areas of Practice in Gurnee

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending adept legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering dedicated legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal assistance to victims affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Tumble Injuries

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering adept legal services for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Building Collisions

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to extending professional legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to supporting clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​