FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hainesville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering dog bite injuries in Hainesville, Carlson Bier law firm stands as a beacon of hope. With an unrivaled command over personal injury law, our experienced attorneys specialize in efficiently handling all facets of dog bite cases to help alleviate the trauma and financial burden associated with these distressing events. Dog bites can lead to serious health effects including infections and severe psychological trauma that may require long-term treatment. You need expert legal representation — someone who understands Illinois’ unique statutes surrounding such incidents and is committed to fighting for your rights diligently. That’s where the expertise of Carlson Bier comes into play—with our substantial knowledge base, we’re equipped to advocate relentlessly on your behalf without compromising on compassion or understanding when it matters most hence giving us an edge over competitors. Choosing Carlson Bier means aligning with excellence— because you deserve nothing less than the best! Trust us with any case regarding dog bite injuries; we strive only for justice wherever required!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hainesville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, one of Illinois’s premier law firms, we excel in advocating for the rights of personal injury victims. Recognized as experts in handling cases related to Dog Bite Injuries – a category of personal injuries that often go unnoticed and understated. Statistically, approximately 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs each year in the United States. Unfortunately, many victims lack awareness regarding their legal rights and potential compensations.

Dogs can be wonderful companions; however, they also have the capacity to inflict serious injuries ranging from minor scratches to more severe wounds leading up to traumatic reconstructive surgeries. Moreover, these incidents can also result in psychological trauma causing fear or anxiety disorders among the victims.

Our team at Carlson Bier ensures that every dog bite victim realizes their entitlement to file a lawsuit against a negligent dog owner under Illinois law. The X-factor that separates us from other firms is our exceptional ability to assertively fight for rightful compensation on behalf of our clients while maintaining empathy and understanding towards their distressing experiences.

Key facts about Dog Bite cases include:

– Under ‘The Animal Control Act’ (510 ILCS 5/16), dog owners are liable if their pets cause harm or injury unless the victim was provoking the pet or intruding on private property.

– Every case varies depending upon factors such as location of bite incident, severity and nature of wound(s), medical expenditures attached for treatment & rehabilitation, loss due to inability of work.

– By filing a complaint within two years from when your injury occurred secures your claim falling into statute limitation period.

While this may seem overwhelming initially considering intentional act or carelessness by someone else has lead you towards burdened financial expenses and emotional discomfort; remember at Carlson Bier we pride ourselves on being advocates for victims providing not only guidance but tangible results through millions recovered various settlements. Our proactive approach guarantees meticulous evaluation building strong defense strategies consequently ensuring maximum benefits rightfully deserved by our clients.

We emphasize on extensive research and collaboration with medical professionals to meticulously document all physical and psychological injuries. This diligently collected data forms the foundation of our aggressive advocacy in seeking rightful compensation for victims as per Illinois law standards.

At Carlson Bier, we operate on contingency basis implying no consultation fees prior representation nor any legal charges unless successful retrieval of compensations granted in your favor. This policy guarantees equal access to high-quality legal services irrespective of one’s economic background because we believe justice should be fair and accessible to everyone.

Being victims themselves battling against distressing situations; it becomes exceedingly challenging navigating through complicated legalese or dealing with cunning insurance companies aiming at paying minimum possible settlements. You don’t have to face this battle alone – Our experienced attorneys gear up extending skilled litigation ensuring that nothing less than the maximum compensation warranted under law is secured.

Equipped with decades worth experience, impeccable track record & compassionate backgrounds; we offer unsurpassed commitment towards every individual who seeks our assistance becoming their guiding light during a time filled with confusion, hurt, financial concerns and mounting stress—relieving them from these burdens so they can focus entirely on healing.

Finally, you may ask: “What is my dog bite injury case worth?” Of course, every unique situation varies but rest assured knowing that at Carlson Bier getting you what you are entitled is non-negotiable – It’s an absolute assurance! So why hesitate? We encourage you to click on the button below for initiating a free case evaluation where one of our expert attorneys will analyze expanse of damages incurred detailing how much your case might potentially be worth. At Carlson Bier every victim matters — Justice isn’t just served rather it’s advocated!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hainesville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hainesville

Areas of Practice in Hainesville

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering expert legal services for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Trip Mishaps

Professional in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Harms

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents gain fair remuneration for wounds and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Mishap

Providing specialist legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on delivering compassionate legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in representing persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440