...

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Hampshire

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate situations of slip and fall accidents in Hampshire, residents can always rely on Carlson Bier. Through several years of handling an extensive range of personal injury cases, this law firm has built a reputation for meticulous attention to detail and unwavering commitment to their clients’ welfare. Their knowledgeable attorneys uphold the values that define them: integrity, dedication and relentless commitment to justice. Providing comprehensive legal counsel throughout every step of your case, they help demystify complex legal processes involved so you feel reassured during a potentially difficult time. As one seeks compensation after such mishaps occur negligence plays a crucial role; nonetheless proving liability is no straightforward task due to frequent intricacies present. One needs an advocate who holds deep understanding in these matters! Navigate swiftly through the complexities associated with slip-and-fall claims using exceptional Illinois-based lawyers from Carlson Bier; your best ally towards achieving deserved recompense for undeserved circumstances caused by others’ neglectful actions.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Hampshire Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to serving individuals across Illinois who have been adversely affected by Slip and Fall Accidents. Our professional team of attorneys specializes in personal injury law with a distinct focus on these potentially life-altering occurrences. As an established group of lawyers, we understand the physical, financial, and emotional toll such incidents can impose on victims. We firmly believe that educating our clients about their rights is integral to achieving favorable outcomes.

In simple terms, Slips and Falls fall under a more extensive legal category known as “premises liability.” Essentially it implies that property owners have a certain degree of responsibility for accidents that occur within their establishments or premises due to poor maintenance or negligence. This includes ensuring safety through routine inspections, rectifying identified hazards promptly, and placing warning signs where potential dangers might be present.

Key components typically animate Slip and Fall cases:

– Establishing fault: A crucial element in any slip and fall accident case involves determining whether the property owner or occupier was at fault.

– Proving negligence: For a successful claimant’s claim, there must be tangible evidence indicating that the defendant did not exercise reasonable care to prevent foreseeable harm.

– Showing substantial injuries: Injuries suffered from the accident should be significant enough to warrant compensation – whether they’re immediate physical injuries like fractures or long-term psychological trauma et al.

We view our role as not only being your representative in front but also empowering you through comprehensive legal insights regarding slip and fall accidents.

While every situation is unique and possess different challenges when it comes down disputes over Premises Liability; here are few quintessential elements which courts take into account while deciphering liability:

• The purpose of victim’s visit – visitors often divided into invitees (people invited onto property), licensees (friends visiting for social reasons etc.) trespassers; each category has different levels associated protection under law.

• Condition of premises led causality between dangerous condition/incident.

• Whether property owner was aware about condition yet failed rectify it.

Understanding these elements can be a complex endeavor, especially when faced with the challenge of recovering both physically and emotionally from an accident. This is where your allies at Carlson Bier step in. Our comprehensive knowledge of personal injury law coupled with our unwavering commitment to justice equips us to navigate this labyrinth on your behalf. Our proven method involves an all-round approach where we investigate the incident thoroughly, evaluate responsible parties, negotiate settlements vigorously and if needed, fight relentlessly in court towards securing fair compensations.

Trust is tantamount to success in legal partnerships – hence why transparency sits at heart here at Carlson Bier. We operate strictly bereft any upfront fees; rather only charging service cost once successfully claiming compensation for you.

At Carlson Bier, we are not just lawyers, but advocates fighting tirelessly for fairness and justice in the intricate world of personal injury law.

We realize every case incredibly personal unique intertwined with individual concerns anxieties make sure empathetically address each query patiently whilst endeavour improve understanding situation hold comprehensible perspective whole scenario ensures informed decisions taken that benefit them long run feel more control over their journey recovery

Garnering financial damages might seem daunting initially however having competent personable team like ours office ensures extensive support throughout process including information guidance,

Finally finding out much your case worth could vital cog mitigating uncertainties around potential outcome thereby providing relief anticipation! CLICK BUTTON BELOW NOW KEY IN DETAILS LET’S UNRAVEL THIS TOGETHER winning isn’t guarantee promised justly fiercely fought right represent cause building stronger community ground up calling beyond it’s time take stand injustice let help assert rights remember aren’t alone struggle move forward one step closer renewed hope brighter tomorrow

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hampshire Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hampshire

Areas of Practice in Hampshire

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying expert legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Misconduct

Extending expert legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal help for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents get just recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing adept legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer