Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hanover Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has been subject to a dog bite injury in Hanover Park, look no further than Carlson Bier for exceptional legal assistance. Our seasoned team specializes in Dog Bite Injuries Law and we’re committed to securing justice for our clients. At Carlson Bier, we understand the gravity of these injuries and their potential impact on your physical health and emotional wellbeing. With tremendous expertise accumulated over years of dedicated service, our lawyers assertively manage cases that ensure adequate compensation is meted out to dog bite victims.

We pride ourselves on providing comprehensive consultation throughout this challenging process; guiding you through recovery claims such as medical bills, lost wages due to injury, psychological trauma among others which may qualify under Illinois law.

Trust us at Carlson Bier as although not physically located in Hanover Park area but have vast experience handling specific cases like yours across Chicago’s suburbs including Hanover Park. We champion victims’ rights with tenacity until justice prevails. Your search ends here with trusted attorneys from clear-cut knowledge fraternity – let’s stand together against any adversity evident post-dogbite incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hanover Park Illinois

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be a traumatic and physically debilitating event. When you or your loved ones become victims, it’s crucial to know your legal rights and the possibility of financial compensation for your suffering and losses. This is where we at Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, step in.

Dog bite injuries are more common than you might think but often neglected until they lead to severe health conditions. These injuries may result in significant physical harm such as puncture wounds, bone fractures, nerve damage, facial scars, and sometimes even psychological trauma requiring extensive recovery periods. Furthermore, serious repercussions like rabies or tetanus infections could develop if not appropriately treated.

You have every right to seek justice when someone else’s negligence has caused you harm. In Illinois, under strict liability laws pertaining to dog bites injuries:

• The dog owner is liable if their dog attacks without provocation.

• This liability applies irrespective of whether the dog has never been violent before.

• Even if an attack happens off the owner’s property with his/her consent – liability still holds.

At Carlson Bier, our team works diligently to champion our clients’ rights that were impeded by these regrettable incidents. Our discipline lies within understanding the complexities surrounding the situation while concurrently being empathetic towards our client needs. Navigating through the burdening process of filing claims independently often leads people into vulnerable circumstances—missing out on proper restitution on account of stress and lack of appropriate legal knowledge is common.

With expertise grounded over years of dealing with personal injury cases at hand including but not limited to -dog bites- we dwell upon getting hold of every detail paired with thorough investigation backed by facts securing maximum possible reparation for medical expenses incurred alongside potential future treatments; loss of wages due owing extended hospital stays; pain, suffering and emotional distress management therapy costs; any punitive damages decided by court amongst others.

The pursuit for justice after a dog bite injury should not be accelerated by anxious assumptions instead should be a result of careful consideration. Seeking skilled legal counsel ensures you don’t become the victim again – this time of an unfair settlement. Moreover, the Illinois statute of limitations allows for only a restricted time period to levy your rightful claims.

The path forward can be challenging, but you don’t have to walk it alone. Here at Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to providing support tailored for each client because every case and every individual is unique in their own standing.

You are likely visiting our webpage because you or someone close holds concerns over an incident involving a dog bite injury. We believe that knowledge freights empowerment – informing people about their rights and potential legal pathways addressing this specific personal injury implicitly affects how one navigates their present situation undoubtedly guiding towards a more secure future.

Now that you’re equipped with some vital information surrounding dog bite injuries laws within Illinois and the manner in which we work hand-in-hand with our clientele through such trying times, consider taking the next step towards quantifying your cause. What does winning look like? Answering this question could lead towards setting tangible goals for compensation requites reflecting an accurate portrayal of suffrage endured post harm inflicted from another’s negligence.

We encourage prospective clients to click on the button below–not just out of sheer curiosity but as an initial stride in establishing what your claim potentially could culminate into worth-wise. It’s essential while attempting legal course onto life thriving past experiences capable of leaving behind indelible imprints both physically so emotionally.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hanover Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hanover Park

Areas of Practice in Hanover Park

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving adept legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal support to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Stumble Occurrences

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding patients of car accidents gain just recompense for wounds and damages.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Delivering expert legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for damages.

Building Accidents

Committed to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Expert in delivering specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Specializing in representing individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer