Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Hanover Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident, it is crucial to seek legal advice immediately. Carlson Bier’s Pedestrian Accident Attorneys team assists injured individuals residing within Hanover Park and surrounding areas, showing them the best course of action after an accident leaves them reeling. Our team is highly experienced in personal injury law with special acumen for handling cases related to pedestrian accidents – from car collisions to workplace injuries. We understand the complex intricacies of Illinois state laws governing such circumstances and utilize this knowledge to their full potential ensuring justice prevails. Carlsson Bier offers personalized service by conducting thorough investigations into each case we take up and persistently pushing against any form of hindrance that prevents successful resolutions likeliest benefiting our clients. Choosing us isn’t merely hiring attorneys; it’s collaborating with advocates who have your welfare at the forefront alongside professional expertise needed under such psychologically strenuous situations—making us an unquestionable choice for representation following pedestrian accidents in Hanover Park vicinity.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Hanover Park Illinois

As a team of dedicated legal professionals, Carlson Bier takes pride in specializing in personal injury law within the jurisdiction of Illinois. One area we have a strong focus on is Pedestrian Accidents. Walking should be one of the safest modes of transportation and no individual should fall victim to accidents arising from negligence or misconduct by motorists.

Pedestrian accidents often result in more critical injuries because, unlike vehicle occupants, pedestrians have no built-in protection. Pedestrians involved in road crashes may experience severe physical injuries such as broken bones, spinal cord problems, traumatic brain injuries, paralysis, and at times even death. As a result of these grave implications, our legal team prioritizes handling cases involving pedestrian accidents with utmost sensitivity and expertise.

● Every situation differs

It’s crucial to recognize that every pedestrian accident case is unique and depends on specific factors like the cause or severity of the accident to determine the nature and amount of compensation eligible for personal injury victims.

● Statute Limitations Apply

Under Illinois law, there’s generally a two-year statute of limitations for filing a personal injury lawsuit related to a pedestrian accident. Hence timely action is important for upholding your rights.

● Thorough investigation

Our skilled lawyers conduct comprehensive investigations into each claim and propose compelling strategies based upon evidence collected via photography, eyewitness accounts, police reports etc., all done assiduously with our clients’ best interest at heart.

In many instances across Illinois where liability is understood clearly like violation of traffic signals or drunk driving resulting in an accident – recovering damages becomes smoother with direct insurance claims. However it’s not always straightforward when multiple parties are involved or if the driver flees from an incident. These kinds of complex scenarios require proficient attorneys who understand state law provisions accurately.

Carlson Bier understands how life-altering pedestrian accidents can be – emotionally distressing family members while derailing regular life activities especially when it involves loss of income due to recovery period or permanent disability. It’s here that our team steps up and fights relentlessly for the rightful compensation of our clients, including recovery related to medical expenses, lost wages, cost for rehabilitation services, punitive damages and compensation for pain and suffering.

While we ardently advocate your rights towards complete compensation from possible sources, we also establish strong communication with our clientele throughout ensuring clarity on case status updates or changes in legal strategy as required. This commitment sets us apart from other law groups and assures our clients of not just a fair settlement but restoring justice for their traumatic ordeal.

Laws are intricate yet pose significant potential to transform lives when used judiciously! Remember each pedestrian case is unique and only a detailed understanding of circumstances can lead to optimal resolution. After all this information about Pedestrian Accidents if you are still wondering what amount lies in your specific claim – don’t wait.Through years of experience coupled with intrinsic knowledge about Illinois laws – the Carlson Bier team offers an insightful lens into estimating worthiness of personal injury claims brought upon by unfortunate pedestrian accidents.

Click on the button below right now to find out exactly how much your case is worth. Your journey towards justice begins today! Let us pursue together what rightfully belongs to you with Carlson Bier standing right beside safeguarding YOUR rights diligently under the complex maze of Illinois legal provisions Don’t let any gap in knowing your rightful share delay bringing solutions you deserve. Time plays an imperative role in building strong cases – so act NOW!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hanover Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Hanover Park

Areas of Practice in Hanover Park

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Supplying adept legal help for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing experienced legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Fall Accidents

Professional in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents receive equitable recompense for wounds and harm.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending adept legal representation for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to offering specialized legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer