FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hanover Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, having knowledgeable and experienced representation is essential. The dedicated team at Carlson Bier provides unparalleled legal guidance for those affected by such personal injuries in Illinois, specifically looking out for residents from Hanover Park. Our attorneys boast substantial experience in handling complex trial litigation pertaining to spinal cord injuries with an unprecedented track record of information-driven advocacy and successful judgments. At Carlson Bier, we understand that each case brings its unique intricacies, demanding personalized strategies tailored to maximize compensation claims. We stand unwaveringly alongside our clients through every step of this challenging journey; helping secure resources required for rehabilitation costs, loss of income compensation and ensuring overall well-being enhancement post-trauma. We don’t just fight for your rights—we fight diligently for your future as well.Our precision-focused approach matched with empathetic client-handling makes Carlson Bier the unchallenged top contender to represent you or loved ones who have suffered a traumatic spinal cord injury. Let us be your steadfast advocates; because you deserve justice served exclusively in your favor.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hanover Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have extensive experience and an unwavering commitment to support individuals who have suffered from spinal cord injuries. As the leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, our powerful advocacy and legal counsel are instrumental during such challenging times. We understand the unanticipated life changes that can occur from sustaining a serious injury like this, which is why we go above and beyond to ensure that your rights are adequately protected.

Spinal cord injuries refer to any harm or damage inflicted on the spinal cord – a crucial part of our central nervous system. These injuries often result in full or partial loss of motor control and sensation below the area of damage, contributing significantly towards debilitated living conditions.

In fact, understanding common sources of spinal cord injuries could be crucial for prevention:

• Road accidents: High-impact collisions in cars, motorcycles or bicycles can commonly cause these injuries.

• Falls: Especially prevalent amongst seniors over 65 years old, even minor slips can lead to major health repercussions.

• Violence: Gunshot wounds and knife attacks account for nearly 15% cases related with spinal cord damages.

• Sports & recreation mishaps: Contact sports accidents or diving calamities in shallow water contribute substantially too.

The impact such injuries endow upon an individual’s lifestyle extends far beyond physical discomfort; emotional distress and financial strain soon become prominent hurdles in people’s lives. Medical bills associated with managing long-term pain alongside physiotherapy costs certainly add up rapidly, not mentioning loss of work hours or reduced earning capabilities post-injury. Thus begins an exhausting cycle – fighting both health adversities as well as fiscal pressure simultaneously.

This is where Carlson Bier steps in. Our injury attorneys are committed to assisting you navigate through this overwhelming process efficiently by handling all intricate legal matters while you focus solely on recovery. Moreover, we strive hard not only for professionalism but also compassion throughout proceedings – stemming from our profound understanding that each case is personal along with its unique challenges.

Strong and effective representation is crucial in such cases, and therefore we keenly concentrate on employing the right strategy optimized for your specific circumstances. If you believe that negligence or wrongdoing by another party led to spinal cord damage, Carlson Bier’s experienced attorneys will meticulously examine your case details so they can build a persuasive personal injury claim tailored to fetch optimal compensation amount.

Our foremost objective is getting justice served by securing the highest compensation possible for clients – encompassing medical bill settlements and reimbursements for pain & suffering incurred. Evidently, nothing can undo the trauma endured due to spinal cord injuries; nevertheless, rightful legal judgment accompanied by financial respite significantly simplifies coping with hardships intrinsically tagged along post-injury course.

At Carlson Bier, knowledge of Illinois laws backboned by years of practical experience positions us perfectly to deal with complex layers these damaging lawsuits often possess. We invite you henceforth to leverage our services without any hesitation – constantly driven towards bestowing comprehensive yet simplified solutions that result in favorable outcomes aligning well with client demands.

With an unwavering dedication towards victim’s rights protection resulting from deep-rooted values framing our work ethics too, approachability remains paramount for us. To discern instantly how much potential your particular case holds from legal standpoint –

**Please click on the button below**

Rest assured knowing we harbor zealous commitment on providing not only seasoned professional services but also compassionate guidance through testing times – ensuring you emerge stronger from aftermath of a life-altering spinal incident optimally fortified both legally and financially.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hanover Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hanover Park

Areas of Practice in Hanover Park

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying specialist legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Providing specialist legal support for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Stumble Occurrences

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents obtain reasonable compensation for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Trucking Accident

Providing expert legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to providing expert legal representation for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440