...

Bicycle Accidents in Hanover

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have been injured in a bicycle accident in Hanover, turn to Carlson Bier for dedicated and comprehensive legal support. As seasoned personal injury attorneys, we appreciate the unique complexities that these cases can present. Bicycling accidents often result in substantial injuries – our role is helping victims like you secure the justice and compensation they deserve. We delve into your case with an acute sense of meticulousness, exploring every possible avenue to strengthen your claim. Our skilled team at Carlson Bier spares no detail while working assiduously towards optimal outcomes tailored to your specific needs.

Recognized for our client-centered approach and impressive track record, choose us as reliable advocates through this challenging period. Here at Carlson Bier, we believe each bike accident victim deserves high-caliber representation backed by integrity, expertise,and compassion.We are not merely pursuing verdicts or settlements; every step taken is about restoring balance to your disrupted life post-accident.As fervent litigators serving Hanover’s bicyclists’ rights,you won’t find better allies than Carlson Bier– Illinois’s trusted source for bicycle accidents law solutions.Choose us today!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Hanover Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a stalwart team of personal injury attorneys who have dedicated ourselves to safeguarding the rights and dignity of our clients. A leading voice in Illinois’ legal landscape, we are particularly adept at handling personal injury cases involving bicycle accidents. As such accidents often lead to debilitating injuries or even death, they instigate grave repercussions for victims – both on the physical and financial fronts.

Bicycle accidents are generally driven by three key factors: road user behaviors, infrastructure hazards, and equipment malfunction. Each plays its role in putting bicyclists at risk. When involved in such situations, it’s crucial to understand that cyclists have every right to seek redress for their damages.

Road user behaviors present the most common threat as motorists frequently overlook bikers. Mistakes such as rapid lane change without checking mirrors or blind spots, opening car doors before surveying for approaching bicycles can lead to devastating collisions; if you’ve been victimized due to such negligent behavior then you are unquestionably entitled to contend for rightful compensation.

Infrastructure hazards too chip into this dire equation with unsuitable roads missing biker-friendly provisions being major offenders. Potholes or gravel strewn paths may cause unsettling falls while high-speed ways without cycling lanes force ill-suited mingling of bicycles and large vehicles – causing dangerous encounters that could be fatal for the former party.

Equipment malfunctions amplify risks significantly but aren’t always the fault of cycler. Faulty gears or ineffective brakes can cause serious wrecks where responsibility switches from cyclist’s careless maintenance/usage towards product manufacturers/distributors liable under ‘product liability law’.

• Irrespective of whether your accident was driven by road user error

• Sparked by unfit infrastructure

• Or stemmed from inefficient equipment

you still retain substantial grounds on which you can claim compensation owing to ‘Illinois Negligence Laws’. These laws stipulate a duty-of-care condition dictated by reasonable expectations that might be self-obvious or circumstantially expected.

Yet, the process of seeking compensation for bicycle injury cases involves convoluted legal procedures; it often requires expert negotiation skills to garner fair settlements from insurance companies. In this complex maze of regulatory intricacies and ceaseless paper-chases, it is immensely beneficial to have professional legal counsel by your side. Carlson Bier ensures you are not only well represented but also wholly understood – we steadfastly champion your interests with every measure in our means.

Our attorneys bring immense expertise clubbed with deep passion into their role; each step they take is aimed at ensuring that you get the maximum possible settlement for your case. Please remember that a stellar personal injury attorney brings more than just impressive credentials – years of intensive experience, zealous advocacy skills and an indomitable spirit can actually tilt scales from “possible” to “probable victory”. That’s what Carlson Bier offers across Illinois…victory within reach!

Ultimately, the aftermath of a bicycle accident should never leave you feeling shortchanged and disenchanted. At Carlson Bier, we strive relentlessly towards securing favorable outcomes for our clientele comprising victims who had their peace disrupted due to someone else’s negligence.

While nothing can truly make up for trauma suffered post an accident, receiving requisite compensation partly restores normalcy into lives unexpectedly shattered. It helps cover swelling medical bills besides granting some financial buffer against wage loss during recovery periods too; through successful litigation/or out-of-court settlements we ensure these damages don’t drain victims’ resources unfairly.

Above all remembering your rights under Illinois law is crucial – as bicyclists involved in accidents caused due to another party’s fault; you’re entitled to pursue claims in acknowledgment of physical/mental anguish endured. As advocates specialized in IL Personal Injury Law – Carlson Bier elucidates these rights while passionately advocating on behalf your cause!

No one deserves to bear aftermaths of a bicycle accident alone or bewildered- that’s where we, Carlson Bier, step in! So why not give yourself a fighting shot at justice by partnering with us? We invite you to click the button below and find out how much your case may potentially be worth. Your journey towards redress begins here; together let’s shift gears from vulnerability to belligerent resilience against unjust adversities.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hanover Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hanover

Areas of Practice in Hanover

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing skilled legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal support for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Tumble Accidents

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents secure just payout for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring adept legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Expert in ensuring professional legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer