FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Hanover

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When selecting a competent representative for medical malpractice cases, it’s crucial to trust a firm possessing the right expertise and successful track record – Carlson Bier excels in both. Our seasoned attorneys have extensive knowledge about intricacies of Illinois law, providing you with robust legal support for any medical negligence scenarios. Past successes testify to our deep commitment towards safeguarding clients’ rights after unfortunate instances of healthcare failings. Your journey toward justice begins with Carlson Bier at your side; we emphasize an honest and transparent approach while cogently unraveling complexities involved in such intricate lawsuits. We prioritize direct communication channels to keep you informed throughout this challenging ordeal, reassuringly guiding each step along the trying legal landscape. Whether it involves diagnosing errors, surgical mishaps or wrongful prescription incidences – choosing Carlson Bier means choosing unwavering dedication encapsulated by empathetic understanding. Entrust us to demand fair accountability from those responsible while tirelessly pursuing maximum possible compensation on your behalf amid medical malpractices.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Hanover Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we believe in providing our clients with the utmost knowledge and understanding of the complexities surrounding medical malpractice cases. As experienced Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, it is our duty to turn confusion into clarity and we are committed to doing just that.

Medical malpractice is a highly specialized area of law where patients who have suffered as a result of negligent healthcare providers seek compensatory damages for their injuries. The term ‘medical negligence’ might be used interchangeably but fundamentally, medical malpractice extends further than mere negligence. It’s about demonstrating that a healthcare professional has willfully or unintentionally deviated from the accepted standards of practice in their field, causing harm or detriment to a patient’s health.

In fact, there are several key criteria a case needs to meet in order to be considered valid for pursuit under Medical Malpractice law. Some primary features include:

– A violation of standard care: This indicates failure on behalf of the healthcare provider in furnishing an acceptable standard quality of care which results in adverse effects on the patient.

– An injury was caused by negligence: Simply proving negligence isn’t adequate; you must establish that the injury occurred due to negligent actions.

– The injury resulted in significant damages: In this context damage can account for past/future medical bills, loss earnings among other factors.

Making sense of all these elements can feel overwhelming especially when recovering from an incident. This is why retaining professional legal help like ours at Carlson Bier becomes vital – we don’t just provide representation but also offer much-needed support every step along your journey towards justice.

Our team is well-equipped and competent enough to handle such intricate matters effectively with exhaustive proficiency gained over years practicing personal injury law right here in Illinois. We perform thorough investigation so all aspects related specifically to your situation count during negotiation or litigation processes ensuring rightful compensation achieved promptly efficiently without leaving any stone unturned.

Successful claimants can receive financial compensation through either negotiated settlements with the healthcare providers’ insurance companies or a courtroom verdict. The specific amount of compensation varies based on several factors, all meticulously considered by Carlson Bier, to make sure you get what you rightly deserve.

In order to ensure that our clients are protected from further distress we work on ‘No win, No fee’ basis which guarantees that clients have nothing to lose and everything to gain by reaching out for legal advice. Fees will only be charged when receiving monetary damages thus compensating our dedicated services provided during trial stages ensuring peace of mind for every injured individual looking justice.

At Carlson Bier we don’t just take cases; we embark on relationships grounded in trust compassion empathy providing utmost professional service while placing human interaction at forefront because we remember above all —our clients are people first , not numbers. We respect your courage come forward seek redressal so let us handle legal complications while concentrate recovery wellbeing.

Do take action today! If you have sustained significant injuries due to possible medical malpractice and believe it is time for someone to pay attention to your suffering, then please utilize the button below to help provide clarity on the worth of your case. Remember, all consultations with Carlson Bier are strictly confidential and opting for this opportunity does not oblige you towards anything more but taking a stand against injustice suffered in silence until now.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hanover Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Hanover

Areas of Practice in Hanover

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying specialist legal advice for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Slip Injuries

Adept in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking recovery for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal aid for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Committed to offering specialized legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Specializing in representing victims with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​