FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hanover

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from a spinal cord injury in Hanover, time is of the essence. Immediate action ensures your rights are protected and necessary compensation claimed promptly. For expert legal representation, consider Carlson Bier: premier authorities on Spinal Cord Injuries law in Illinois. Our extensive knowledge coupled with our tireless devotion allows us to safeguard your interests passionately and professionally, providing vital counsel at every stage of your case. At Carlson Bier, we understand that cases involving spinal cord injuries entail not only physical torment but also emotional trauma – we strive to mitigate all hardships faced by victims and their families through swift legal intervention tailored strategically for each unique situation. Leveraging our accumulative years practicing personal injury law exclusively amplifies your chances of securing rightful restitution remarkably higher than going it alone or less experienced firms; you’re left reassured knowing justice is being sought diligently by an adept team versed particularly in spinal cord injuries lawsuits within the complex landscape of Illinois laws.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hanover Illinois

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) are some of the most severe injuries a person can sustain. They often result in lifelong disabilities, myriad medical complications, and significant changes to quality of life—both for victims and their families. At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe that if you’ve sustained an SCI due to someone else’s negligence, you deserve justice—and it’s our mission as personal injury attorneys based in Illinois to help secure it.

Understanding Spinal Cord Injuries: A spinal cord injury is damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. These injuries usually have permanent effects on strength, sensation and other body functions below the level of the injury site. The severity is often classified as:

• Complete: If all feeling and ability to control movement are lost.

• Incomplete: If there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area.

Many SCIs result from preventable accidents such as traffic crashes, falls, sports incidents or work-related accidents. Nonetheless, they can also occur because of violent encounters or health issues like cancer.

Dealing with these complex cases demands an integrated understanding of both legal regulations around personal injury claims and specific medical perspectives on SCIs. This is where Carlson Bier can provide immense value through our extensive experience handling such cases coupled with our solid relationships with reputable medical experts statewide.

The Consequences Of Spinal Cord Injuries vary but might include physical implications such as paraplegia (paralysis affecting the lower limbs), quadriplegia (impacting all four limbs), breathing difficulties, chronic pain among others. Additionally,

• Emotional Impact: Victims often face depression or anxiety.

• Financial Strain: Meeting rehabilitation costs while possibly dealing with losing steady income.

• Challenges in day-to-day living: Activities previously taken for granted may now require special equipment or assistance.

No compensation can truly alleviate these struggles; however obtaining financial restitution can contribute towards affording essential medical treatments, alternative therapies, and necessary lifestyle adaptations. At Carlson Bier, our adept attorneys aim to establish the maximum compensation under Illinois law on your behalf based upon your particular circumstances.

In a legal context, providing evidence of negligence or intentional harm is critical for SCI claims. Factors considered include:

• Location and details of accident,

• Medical expenses incurred – both current and future estimates

• Lost earnings and potential impact on livelihood

• Extent of pain endured by victim.

The intricacies involved in proving such factors highlight why it’s wise to employ the services of a competent legal team like Carlson Bier’s who can empathetically navigate you through this tasking ordeal.

Filing a lawsuit after an SCI may seem tough amidst dealing with trauma; however it’s crucial that victims remember their right to justice. Our protective attitude towards our clients embodies in our detail-oriented approach aimed at achieving fair settlements or verdicts.

Our team likes to remind each one who bravely comes forward seeking justice what matters really: You’re Not Alone After a Spinal Cord Injury. We are here alongside you in facing the liable parties, relentless insurance companies and navigating intricate laws that constitute personal injury proceedings in Illinois.

It’s integral you familiarize yourself with more specifics about Spinal Cord Injuries while also recognizing how pivotal selecting the right professional legal guidance is during these trying times. Great news! You’ve made a start by educating yourself today via this comprehensive content provided by Carlson Bier. Now, take the leap; click on the button below to find out exactly how much your case could be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hanover Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hanover

Areas of Practice in Hanover

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving specialist legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering experienced legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing professional legal help to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Trip Accidents

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to assisting sufferers of car accidents receive just settlement for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Collision

Ensuring expert legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to offering expert legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Expert in advocating for clients with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​