Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Harrisburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the traumatic aftermath of dog bite injuries, you deserve the formidable advocacy and compassionate counsel offered by Carlson Bier. We stand unparalleled in our fierce dedication to obtaining rightful compensation for victims suffering from such incidents. As detection dogs sniff out evidences, we meticulously examine every detail of your case within Illinois’s legal framework to ensure maximum recovery of damages. Our reputation as seasoned attorneys is rooted in Harrisburg, bolstered by countless successful representations setting benchmarks statewide. With an expertise honed over years handling personal injury cases like dog bite injuries, choosing Carlson Bier translates into entrusting your fight to unwavering hands uncompromising on justice delivery. We recognize that in a post-bite scenario, you need more than just medical care; you require effective judicial redress which Carlson Bier offers expertly without hinting at any geographical confines or limitations because we know no boundaries when it comes to pursuing what’s right for you — be it physical restoration or emotional healing through justified verdicts.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Harrisburg Illinois

Understanding the intricacies of dog bite injuries and your legal recourse is pivotal to obtaining the compensation you deserve. At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to offering unrivalled expertise based on our broad experience as personal injury attorneys. One significant area in which we provide legal assistance involves incidents relating to dog bites. Injuries sustained from such encounters can be traumatic, both physically and emotionally. Accumulated medical expenses can also be a source of hardship, which underscores the relevance of expert representation.

Dog bite laws vary by state; yet in Illinois, the full responsibility falls on the pet owner if their dog attacks someone without provocation, regardless of the setting or location where this happens or whether there has been past indication that said pet would act aggressively—this falls under what’s known as ‘strict liability’. Once you’ve reported a case directly after receiving treatment for your injuries, it becomes essential to identify the aggressive animal’s owner properly.

Several key elements about dog bite cases should be noted:

• Medical attention: Dog bites could lead into severe complications if not treated promptly and correctly—ranging from bacterial infections like cellulitis to even neurological damage in extreme circumstances.

• Gathering evidence: You’ll want good-quality pictures of your wounds and any torn clothing, witness statements if available—even details such as breed characteristics aimed at determining behavior trends could end up helping your case immensely.

• Time Limits: An important point to note is that you have two years post-infliction of harm within which an official complaint against the culprit animal’s keeper must be lodged.

Navigating the claims process following a dog bite incident requires understanding these complexities involved with civil litigation accurately—a task made smoother when handled by experienced lawyers who comprehend every nuance related to this specific niche within personal injury law. Being realistic about probable outcomes attaches importance not just to securing based-on-fact figures regarding possible settlement totals but also emphasizes ensuring overall justice being served in each situation going forward.

In numerous cases, the insurance provider might question certain aspects—for instance, whether it was the client’s own behavior that provoked such a reaction in the canine, or if there’s proof of an injury genuinely stemming from this very incident. It demands robust counter-arguments constructed around truth and evidence collection over time. At Carlson Bier, our commitment includes putting together convincing narratives while addressing every crucial detail uncovered during investigations.

These services extend to residents throughout Illinois without being restricted geographically confined based on locality specifics—we don’t separate urban dwellers from their suburban counterparts equally seeking fair representation after suffering trauma courtesy of someone else’s pet dog biting them unanticipatedly.

Carlson Bier envisions personalizing each intervention suite to address varying scenarios potentially augmenting ecological circumstances across different settings—suburban houses with minimalist fencing versus urban apartments lacking open spaces intermittently changing into playgrounds inevitably influence how specific incidents unfold. Therefore we intend to mold our approach based on these diverse place-induced determinants affecting outcomes expected broadly speaking before launching legal processes materially impacting lives onto a better trajectory than currently experienced.

Facilitating conversations about your sustained injuries aims at identifying mismatch areas adversely influencing key attributes catalyzing desired change then figuring out tailored solutions promoting holistic well-being. We extend initial consultancy sessions free of charge enabling you to evaluate service structures proposed by us without making upfront payments straightway—an arrangement poets epitomize as ‘risk-averse’ demonstrating we genuinely care for every hard-earned dollar saved diligently over lifetimes subjected unknowingly against swift reversals transpiring fatefully.

Whatever situation you find yourself in relationally linked directly towards experiencing harm caused uniquely by unprovoked canines belonging legally unto third-party handlers—represented official capacity primarily by Carlson Bier attorneys renders hope anew wrapped comfortingly within justice’s capable arms leading victims towards recovering rightfully claimed compensations owed uncompromisingly.

To delve further into what adaptations mean practically applied considering your peculiarity—simultaneously wanting to comprehend ballpark numbers approximating your case’s actual worth, click the button right below helping hugely while navigating unforgiving landscapes employed standardly across legal professions mostly. It’s time for you to take that next step, begin this journey toward healing and recovery today by contacting Carlson Bier. Your path to justice starts here!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Harrisburg Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Harrisburg

Areas of Practice in Harrisburg

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving expert legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering professional legal support for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering skilled legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Professional in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Mishap

Providing specialist legal assistance for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Building Collisions

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to extending dedicated legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Focused on representing persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer