FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Harristown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury? Trust Carlson Bier, the leading legal experts in Illinois to swiftly secure your compensation. We understand the physical pain and emotional distress that such incidents cause, prompting our commitment towards aggressive advocacy for dog bite victims. Our practice has experienced attorneys who specialize in this particular field of personal injury law and have an impressive track record in acquiring just settlements for our clients. Operating with a deep understanding of Harristown’s unique community dynamics, we utilize key local insights in crafting compelling cases that resonate with jurors and judges alike. With us on your side, you secure diligence at its finest – uncompromising attention to details; countless hours dedicated to investigation; strategic negotiation expertise – all translating into successful case outcomes for you! Choose Carlson Bier: not just as attorneys but as your compassionate allies through these challenging times. A clearer path awaits you towards resolution and restitution after a serious dog bite incident when represented by Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Harristown Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be traumatic incidents, not only causing physical harm but also emotional distress. At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated group of personal injury attorneys committed to aiding victims of such unfortunate events as we understand the severe implications these occurrences can have on your life. Based in Illinois, our mission is to ensure that you receive the rightful compensation for your pain and suffering from dog bite injuries.

When it comes to Dog Bite Injuries, many people may not comprehend the magnitude of harm they can cause. The immediate physical aftermath could include wounds, nerve damage or even infections if left untreated. But beyond these physical damages lie psychological scars like anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

The State of Illinois supports victims of dog bites through its legislation which states that owners are legally responsible for their pets’ actions. This means that when a person is bitten by a dog, regardless of the animal’s prior behavior or breed type, legal claims can be pursued against its owner for any resultant damages. As seasoned experts with substantial experience around the state laws regarding such site attacks., at Carlson Bier we highly encourage all victims to seek prompt legal advice..

• A successful claim requires:

– Proof that the defendant owns the dog

– Evidence showing there was no provocation.

– Demonstration that victim was behaving peaceably

– Confirmation that this incident occurred while victim had legal rights to be on location.

As focused personal injury lawyers based in Illinois; our motto is ‘Policy over Place’. By cooperating with clients across countless jurisdictions within Illinois without localized constraints; our commitment rests purely on delivering quality service rather than specific locations./This makes us versatile enough to provide expert assistance regardless where you reside in Illinois/

Our proficiency allows us to accurately evaluate individual cases according-to multiple parameters including-the nature-of injury sustained,-required medical treatment,-lost wages),and anticipated future expenses, among other factors)

We assure adequate representation for you to recover – financial compensation for your damages through a successful claim; encompassing your medical expenses), emotional suffering,-and other related losses.`.

Navigating the legal realm surrounding dog bit injuries can be daunting and complex. Our firm prides itself on our patient approach, taking time to understand each client’s unique situation-educational content about the process,,so that they feel informed and empowered.

Here at Carlson Bier, we recognize that every case is different,-requiring customized attention and strategies. We work on a contingency basis ,interpreting as no out-of-pocket fees,-you don’t pay-unless we obtain compensation on your behalf,

Finally, whether your injury was minor or severe;, if it caused physical pain and stress-or loss of earnings;-even if you were denied compensation previously–we believe in delivering justice./For proper valuation of your case).–Click The Button Below. Let us help you determine what this unfortunate incident could mean for you}financially., Obtain a comprehensive understanding of the worth-of it all when interpreted in Illinois law“’s perspective,

At Carlson Bier meaning we fight-for rightful justice`.. bridging the gap between injury,)suffering-and deserved payment/calculation.;With exclusive focus-on personal injury law;;we are here-to pledge well-informed advice wide-ranging knowledge=on dog bite-related injuries+]

Remember: Justice isn’t confined by geographic location……… Wherever you are in Illinois: trust–Carlson Bier-& let’s build-a stronger future…… Further than any wounds.,

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Harristown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Harristown

Areas of Practice in Harristown

Bike Crashes

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving specialist legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring professional legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Tumble Incidents

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Damages

Offering legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Focused on helping victims of car accidents get fair remuneration for injuries and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Truck Collision

Delivering experienced legal advice for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to providing dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Specializing in advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440