...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hartford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Hartford, count on Carlson Bier to passionately advocate for your rights. Our aggressive representation is bolstered by our meticulous attention to detail and intimate understanding of Illinois’ Dog Bite Statutes, positioning us as leading legal allies tackling this specific sort of personal injury lawsuits. At Carlson Bier, we realize that a seemingly minor incident can result in significant physical harm and emotional trauma – it’s not just an attack; it’s your life altered considerably. We’re ready to fight relentlessly for the compensation you rightfully deserve: medical bills, lost wages, pain themselves should be accounted for fully in any outcome sought after. With credentials earned within the courts across Illinois and extensive experience handling complex negotiations while maintaining ethical principles intact every step throughout these harsh times—as proven by our track record—you can trust us standing beside you prestigeously as dedicated partners from beginning till endmaking sure nothing stands between victims like yourself getting what they are entitled too!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hartford Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we proudly devote our legal expertise to safeguarding the rights of personal injury victims across Illinois. As a committed team of dedicated and experienced attorneys, we specialize in numerous areas including one very specific area: Dog Bite Injuries. The aftermath of a dog bite can be devastating both physically and emotionally. That’s why it is absolutely important that you have access to resources and expert help to navigate these often challenging times.

Dog bites might seem common yet they still remain somewhat misunderstood in terms of legal provisions for the victim. Our primary aim is to demystify the complexities surrounding such personal injuries so that our clients are well equipped with knowledge as they traverse through their journey towards justice.

In Illinois, here are critical aspects worth noting about dog bite law:

• Law Code 510 ILCS 5/16 states clearly, if you’re bitten or otherwise injured by an ‘at large’ dog without provocation while in a place where you’re legally allowed to be; then owner or person harboring the animal would typically bear responsibility.

• This statute covers not only bites but also other types of harm caused by dogs.

• To prove your case, demonstrating lack of provocation from your side alongside evidence showing that you were allowed by law to be in said place during incident time will suffice.

• No prior history serves necessary on part of the canine for damages due – complete liability lies upon owners even when they claim unawareness regarding aggressive tendencies of their pet.

Understanding and proving negligence becomes vital too at times circumstantially beyond cases explicitly covered under this statute like when premise falls within occupied properties owned/held by parties other than actual dog owner.

Now we understand such situations can feel incredibly daunting; however, it’s crucially essential not illegally assigned blame or insufficiently compensate victims faced with physical trauma coupled potentially followed by psychological scars subsequent from vicious attacks like these. Therefore, let us support you through process while we ensure that you receive compensation rightfully deserved. Our seasoned legal professionals at Carlson Bier are readying to leverage their wealth of experience and expertise in managing such cases effectively.

Abide closely with regulations designated by Illinois law for rightful representation, this prevents us from advertising specific locations unless we possess physical offices therein perfectly – just to assure potential clients out there about our authenticity as a credible and reputable personal injury law firm.

In conclusion, don’t let the ill-effects of dog bite injuries weigh heavily upon your shoulders alone. Legal rights exist meant specifically to protect victims like yourself, ensure these empowered laws serve your interest by partnering with us today in seeking appropriate justice. Carlson Bier thrives itself on its utmost dedication toward helping people affected adversely by such tragic incidents reclaim back semblance of normalcy back into their lives during crisis times – help us assist you better.

To further understand how much your case could be worth when put forth within realms guided through proven proficiency upheld consistently by our experienced attorneys, please click on button below… Because every individual deserves expert treatment especially when they’ve been subjected under unfortunate happenstances such as described here. Let our team ardently fight for fair circle taking shape around you ensuring rightful justice served adequately is no more fractionated dream but reality awaiting manifestation right next instance cusp arrival onto scene itself adorned well among capable hands that know very secrets lying ensconced deeply within emboldened crux carved core nurtured legal nuances inside out!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hartford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hartford

Areas of Practice in Hartford

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Extending professional legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Offering specialist legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Truck Accident

Providing specialist legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in offering dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in supporting clients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​