FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hartford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, you need highly skilled legal representation. Carlson Bier remains committed to championing your case with precision and dedication in Hartford. Our firm’s specialization in Spinal Cord Injuries distinguishes us, ensuring that we offer advice tailored to your situation. Notwithstanding pain and emotional anguish, victims also grapple with exorbitant medical expenses; hence our fighter instinct helps alleviate such burdens by seeking maximum compensation. We understand Hartford’s unique dynamics extensively, positioning us strategically when representing clients in these matters within this area.

Moreover, through years of unwavering dedication serving individuals coping with such devastating injuries across Illinois state law parameters reinforces our commitment to your case irrespective of its complexity or magnitude – an illustration of why Carlson Bier is an optimum pick as a Spinal Cord Injuries attorney group.

With comprehensive knowledge about both non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord cases intricacies coupled with extensive understanding in leveraging effective legal strategies: Carlson Bier is more than just attorneys; consider us partners on this path towards obtaining rightful justice for every victim impacted by spinal cord injuries within Hartford city’s confines.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hartford Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a top-tier personal injury lawyer group based in Illinois, we understand that a spinal cord injury can significantly change one’s life. Our experienced attorneys offer steadfast and meticulous legal assistance to victims of such catastrophic injuries. We are well-versed with the ins and outs of these cases and strive for maximum compensation on your behalf.

Spinal Cord Injuries can occur due to several reasons like accidents, sporting incidents, falls or acts of violence. Apart from being extremely painful, they may also lead to paralysis and other lifelong medical conditions such as quadriplegia or paraplegia.

• They might result in Loss of Physical Sensations: One key feature of spinal cord injuries is the potential loss of physical sensations below the level of the injury. The severity varies depending on the nature of damage dealt to nerve fibers.

• In New Cases Functionality May Improve but Permanent Damage is Likely: While functionality may improve within six months for some individuals who suffer a fresh spinal cord injury, permanent impairment is likely if there’s no noticeable improvement after this duration.

• Paralysis May Occur Depending on Severity: The two major types of paralysis resulting from spinal cord injuries include – Quadriplegia (affects all four limbs) and Paraplegia (typically impacts only lower body).

The primary focus at Carlson Bier is educating our clients about their rights post-spinal cord injuries. We follow an empathetic approach while working relentlessly towards securing rightful compensation for you against potentially negligent parties responsible for your predicament.

It’s noteworthy that potential claims may encompass various spheres like medical bills (both current & future), rehabilitation costs, loss in earning capacity and non-economic damages like physical pain or mental anguish following the incident leading to these injurious repercussions.

It isn’t rare for insurance companies to undervalue claim settlements related to serious injuries such as those inflicted upon spinal cords; it’s part of their strategy operating under wholesome corporate profit motives. We, at Carlson Bier, bring years of expertise in negotiating with these resourceful insurers and strive to attain a favorable verdict for our clients.

In Illinois, personal injury litigations usually follow the doctrine of comparative negligence; if you’re deemed partially liable for your predicament, your final compensation would be reduced by that proportion. Thus, it becomes vital to fortify the case via detailed consolidation of applicable evidence. Our seasoned attorneys have honed the skills required to outmaneuver opposing legal teams trying to deflect or dilute their client’s culpability.

Importantly, Illinois Statutes impose a cap on the time within which a spinal cord injury lawsuit can be filed (typically two years from date of accident or discovery). Legal complexities coupled with rigid deadlines make it crucial to secure professional legal assistance post such life-altering injuries.

At Carlson Bier, we’ve prioritized an efficient clientele approach ensuring streamlined communication throughout your litigation process while respecting confidentiality mandates honoring attorney-client relationships.

If you’ve suffered spinal cord injuries owing to someone else’s negligent actions or lack thereof, realize that you do not need to go through this ordeal alone. Your path towards justice begins here and now – lean on us at these challenging times and allow us help recuperate meaningful compensation against perpetrated injustices upon you!

Remember – standing up for your rights isn’t only about healing physically; it’s equally about rebuilding your life economically. So act quickly! Click the button below and find out how much your case is truly worth! Don’t delay in providing yourself the opportunity to reclaim what you deserve – Justice & Compensation!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hartford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hartford

Areas of Practice in Hartford

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving adept legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering professional legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Stumble Injuries

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents gain reasonable payout for damages and damages.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Truck Collision

Extending specialist legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in defending persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​