...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hecker

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from a dog bite injury in Hecker, Carlson Bier is your optimal legal solution. With an extensive background in personal injury law and profound expertise of Illinois’s specific regulations regarding such cases, the firm commands unparalleled capability to ensure that justice sees the light of day every time. Dog bite injuries can be extremely traumatic; physical scars may heal but the psychological implications could be lifelong. It’s here where our dedicated attorneys step in – fighting by your side with uncompromised compassion while relentlessly pursuing to secure your rightful compensation so that you are not left unheard nor underrepresented. What sets Carlson Bier apart is their approach which amalgamates proficiency with perspicuity, thereby making complex legal matters understandable for those affected most. Furthermore, they pride themselves on quick response times and effective communication — vital components when dealing with time-sensitive cases like dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hecker Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we believe in providing our clients with a comprehensive understanding of the complexities involved in personal injury cases, so you can make informed decisions about your case. One of the more common claims we handle is related to dog bite injuries, an area of law that might seem straightforward but comes with its unique nuances and legalities.

In Illinois, dog owners are held accountable if their pets cause harm or injury to another person under the Animal Control Act. This strict liability law means that victims seeking compensation do not need to prove negligence – they must show merely that they were legally allowed on the property where the incident happened and did not provoke the animal. However, this does not mean that obtaining rightful damages is plain sailing.

The process often involves intricate legal procedures involving medical proofs, witness testimonies, insurance negotiations, and perhaps even court battles which Carlson Bier can skillfully navigate on your behalf from start to finish.

• Proof of Ownership: Determining and proving who owns the dog is a critical part of filing a claim for damages.

• Severity of Injury: Medical documentation detailing the severity and extent of your physical injuries aids in setting your claim’s worthiness.

• Psychological Damage: It’s also crucial to consider emotional trauma caused by dog attacks which could be compensable.

• Liabilities & Exceptions: Even though not required, if it can be confirmed that carelessness by dog’s owners led directly to an attack – it strengthens victim’s cases significantly.

Moreover, exceptions do exist when it comes to owner defenses such as trespassing or provocation claims being advanced against victims. We help neutralize these barriers ensuring justice prevails!

It’s also essential for potential plaintiffs to know that Illinois has a statute limitations for filing suits relating specifically dog bites – usually within two years from date-of-harm causation. If actions aren’t initiated timely within prescribed periods – all rights for pursuing justice may be altogether waived off! Hence at Carlson Bier we encourage immediate legal consultations so that your rights are duly safeguarded.

In addition, if the injury is from a dog not covered by homeowners’ insurance or if the owner possesses inadequate coverage – legal options to get compensated might seem narrow. But with Carlson Bier, our resourceful attorneys explore all avenues such as turning to your medical pay coverage under your own home or auto policy.

At Carlson Bier, we use our extensive knowledge and tenacity to ensure you receive what’s rightfully yours. We understand the emotional torment a dog bite can cause and sympathize with victims who justly deserve compensation for their physical damage and mental anguish. Our philosophy goes beyond settling cases; instead, we strive diligently until maximum possible compensation is reached.

Our experienced attorneys will walk you through every step of this complex process, offering expert advice tailored specifically to your case. They’ll be readily available at any juncture ensuring all questions are answered promptly while keeping informed about ongoing developments in detail throughout entirety of your case’s journey.

Now that you’re better versed on intricacies surrounding Illinois Dog Bite Laws – why not find out how much your claim could potentially be valued at realistically? If you’ve been victimized due an unfortunate canine-involved incident recently – press click button illustrated below right away without delay! An action initiated timely may equal justice served timely too! Remember–at Carlson Bier excellence in commitment towards client’s satisfaction isn’t just claimed; it’s consistently delivered!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hecker Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hecker

Areas of Practice in Hecker

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing professional legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Extending experienced legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Tumble Accidents

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents get reasonable settlement for injuries and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Mishap

Delivering expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in advocating for persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​