FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Hecker

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you face the aftermath of pedestrian accidents in Hecker, consider reaching out to Carlson Bier. As one of Illinois’ distinguished personal injury lawyer firms, we have garnered extensive experience and knowledge in handling pedestrian accident claims effectively. We understand the devastating physical and emotional impact such an incident can have on your life, thus offering outstanding legal support is our priority. Our firm excels in fighting for our clients’ rights, ensuring they receive appropriate compensation from responsible parties to help manage medical expenses and loss of income. Our knack for meticulous examination of possible causal factors that may play a part as contributory negligence provides us with key insights into case-specific strategies geared towards successful outcomes. With compassion woven into our ethos alongside professional vigor, Carlson Bier has proven time and again why we are a suitable choice when it comes to seeking representation for pedestrian accident cases all over Illinois including Hecker. Reach out today if you seek competent handling while navigating through these complex legal waters.”

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Hecker Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing top-notch legal representation to victims of pedestrian accidents, an often-overlooked sector of personal injury law. As a respected Illinois-based law firm, our expert attorneys boast extensive knowledge and experience when it comes to standing up for the rights of foot-travelers wronged on roadways or crosswalks.

Pedestrian accidents are unfortunately common and can have devastating consequences. These collisions typically involve motor vehicles striking pedestrians, causing severe physical harm that often leads to considerable financial strain from medical bills, rehabilitation costs, lost wages due to time off from work or even disability. This is where Carlson Bier steps in.

As pedestrian accident attorneys:

• We provide comprehensive evaluation and investigation of your case.

• Our lawyers pursue maximum compensation appropriate for your injury severity.

• We represent you steadfastly against insurance companies who may attempt to minimize your claim.

• Acting as your advocate throughout negotiations or court proceedings so that you obtain justice for the harm suffered.

Understanding the common causes behind pedestrian-related accidents is crucial in developing strong defense strategies. Distracted driving is one major cause wherein drivers busy with cell phones, food, or other distractions overlook pedestrians. Speeding is another significant factor as fast-moving vehicles leave less time for driver response upon seeing a pedestrian; same goes for alcohol impairment which slows reflexes and impairs decision-making abilities. Moreover – reckless driving like running red lights or stop signs also endangers foot-travelers regularly.

The pedestal rule plays a critical role within the context of Illinois’s personal injury laws related to pedestrian accidents. Per this statute, motorists are legally obligated to yield right-of-way to pedestrians under almost all circumstances; failing which they could potentially face liability for any ensuing injuries.

It’s equally important to understand potential recoveries from a successful personal injury lawsuit due to a pedestrian accident. Victims might be entitled to more than just reimbursement of medical expenses incurred but could also seek compensation for pain, suffering and any disfigurement caused including future medical bills if long-term care or rehabilitation is required

At Carlson Bier, we take pride in offering compassionate yet assertive representation for our clients. Understanding the diverse concerns facing victims of pedestrian accidents, we offer personalized legal strategies based on your case specifics. Each client’s case is unique; therefore, you can expect a tailored approach designed to secure maximum possible recovery.

We believe everyone deserves high-quality legal support when they’re caught in an accident that wasn’t their fault. Hence we promise transparency throughout your journey with us and prioritize keeping you informed about your case progress at every step along the way.

However, it’s vital that potential clients act swiftly following an accident as Pedestrian injury cases are subject to a Statute of Limitations under Illinois law which imposes deadlines for filing legal claims. Delaying could threaten your ability to recover full compensation or miss filing your lawsuit within the prescribed timeframe completely.

Given the intricate nuances involved in pedestrian injury cases, secure experienced counsel like Carlson Bier‘s team today – where we are dedicated to not only knowing but also effectively navigating these guidelines to protect your best interests ultimately.

To conclude – if you’ve been injured as a pedestrian owing to someone else’s negligence: don’t wait! Click on the button below and learn what value Carlson Bier attorneys can bring to your personal injury claim by finding out how much could potentially be recouped from this incident for you! Because at Carlson Bier – We fight for justice so that you can focus on healing.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hecker Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Hecker

Areas of Practice in Hecker

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Giving skilled legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Offering experienced legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering adept legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Providing legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Committed to helping clients of car accidents get appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering professional legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on delivering compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to supporting clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440