...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Henry

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with complex dog bite injury cases, turning to Carlson Bier is the optimal choice. Our proficient team of attorneys understand the profound effects such incidents hold – physically, emotionally and financially. Dedicated to upholding your interests, we navigate through intricate Illinois laws surrounding Dog Bite Injuries. We have deep-rooted experience strategizing potent lawsuits in Henry among many other cities in Illinois; drawing on this wealth of knowledge allows us to reliably counter obstacles that come our way.

Our commitment goes beyond just legal representation; we empathize deeply with every client’s situation and stand as an unwavering pillar of support throughout each case process. Partnership with Carlson Bier means gaining advocates who not only bring a rich tapestry of legal expertise but also bear holistic understanding towards clients’ unique requirements.

Trustingly choosing Carlson Bier grants assurance for results-driven legal aid interwoven impeccably with sincere compassion – making us more than just lawyers but steadfast allies in your fight for justice after a harrowing dog bite incident in Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Henry Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and stress that accompany dog bite injuries. Each year in Illinois, countless residents suffer the physical and emotional distress caused by these unfortunate incidents. Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys is dedicated to guiding you through the legal process with empathy and expertise.

Dog bites can result in a variety of injuries ranging from minor cuts or bruises to severe lacerations, broken bones, or nerve damage. These attacks may also lead to serious psychological repercussions such as anxiety disorders or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, there are possible medical complications including infection-risk diseases like tetanus or rabies from unvaccinated dogs. Every victim’s situation is unique which makes it crucial for every claim to be thoroughly assessed based on its own merits.

• Severity and nature of your injuries

• Extent of necessary medical treatment

• Impact on your quality of life

• Whether the dog had prior knowledge of aggression

As your personal injury attorney group in Illinois, Carlson Bier is steadfastly committed to making this traumatic time less stressful by handling all legal aspects professionally. We work persistently to hold those responsible accountable for their actions and pursue maximum compensation on your behalf.

Illinois follows strict liability when it comes to dog bites which means that dog owners are strictly liable if their pet injures another person unless the victim was provoking the attack intentionally or trespassing on private property. Here at Carlson Bier, well-versed in these laws along with comparative fault principles pertaining to instances where more than one party holds responsibility for an accident.

Moreover, navigating time limits for filing claims known as statutes of limitations could seem intimidating but remains essential while seeking justice via litigation route; within two years after suffering an injury caused by a dog bite incident in our state i.e., Illinois you typically must file any corresponding lawsuit. The clock starts ticking either from the date when attack happened or once victim reasonably should have become aware of their injury and its cause.

However, there’s no need to feel overwhelmed as Carlson Bier is here behind you every step of the way. Our proficient attorneys will not only help interpret these complex legalities but also assist you in filing a lawsuit, negotiating with insurers, gathering evidence, exploring possible defenses, and finally moving towards settlement or trial based on your best interests.

We firmly believe that knowledge empowers individuals therefore make it our mission to enlighten victims about various available options so they can make an informed decision alongside feeling supported during this challenging time.

Dealing with dog bite injuries goes beyond battling physical pain indeed extending to emotional turmoil along-with financial distress due to medical expenses coupled with lost wages for some. At Carlson Bier, we empathize profoundly hence fight relentlessly to reclaim what rightfully belongs to our clients through effective strategies underlining the aggressive representation tailored specifically according to each client’s unique situation.

We hope this comprehensive overview has provided valuable insight into issues surrounding dog bites in Illinois thereby being substantial helpful resource for those confronting such circumstances.

At Carlson Bier we are genuinely passionate about helping innocent victims regain control over their lives post-dog bite incidents ensuring they receive bountiful compensation for both acknowledged and hidden costs related with these horrific events by demonstrating absolute commitment throughout dealing process right from initial consultation till claim closure.

Remember you are not alone in the aftermath of a dog bite incident; let skilled guidance from experienced personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier accompany you on path towards recuperation. We encourage you now – take the first steps towards securing justice & potential compensation that might just recompense for your ordeal – click on the button below today find out how much your case may be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Henry Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Henry

Areas of Practice in Henry

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending specialist legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring professional legal assistance for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Tumble Accidents

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Traumas

Supplying legal help for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Accidents: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Truck Collision

Providing specialist legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for damages.

Construction Collisions

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in ensuring dedicated legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Specializing in assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​