...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Herrin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a dog bite injury throws your life in disarray, necessitating quick access to expert legal advice, Carlson Bier proudly steps up as the dependable choice. Dog bites often bring with them complex medical and liability issues, where our advanced understanding of Illinois’s intricate personal injury law comes to your advantage. With Carlson Bier handling your case, you receive not only proficient negotiation skillsets but also compassionate service that empathizes with what you are going through. The proficiency of our attorneys at working on a contingency fee basis underlines our commitment – we win when you do! In cases involving minors or severe injuries in Herrin city’s territory covered by strict animal control laws updated frequently; this can make all the difference between success and failure for your claim. At Carlson Bier, pursuing justice after a dog bite is more than just work – For us it’s about standing up for individuals’ rights and offering necessary support in their hour of need. Choose wisdom, choose experience; choose Carlson Bier – A partner who understands!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Herrin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our primary focus as personal injury attorneys is to ensure our clients receive the compensation they rightfully deserve after suffering from unforeseen accidents. One area in which we specialize is dog bite injuries—a surprisingly common yet frequently overlooked form of personal injury in Illinois.

Dog bites can lead to devastating physical and emotional trauma. In extreme cases, victims might require extensive medical treatment or psychological counseling. The severity of the wound largely depends on factors such as the breed of the dog and its size, whether it was provoked or not, and how quickly medical attention was provided post-injury.

Understanding your rights following a canine attack are critical when determining what steps should be taken next:

– First and foremost, seeking immediate medical help should be prioritized.

– Secondly, if possible without endangering oneself further, try obtaining information about the dog’s owner for future reference.

– Report promptly to local animal control authorities about the incident—this documentation may prove invaluable when filing your claim.

– Lastly, consider discussing your situation with an experienced personal injury attorney who specializes in dog bite cases.

Despite popular assumption that a dog bite victim cannot seek compensation if bitten upon trespassing or provoking the’friendly neighborhood pet,’ legal safeguards well establish that any unprovoked attack causing harm warrants compensatory coverage by law.

The State of Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ for matters relating dogs harming individuals; meaning there’s no requirement for ‘one-bite rule’ precedent or needing to prove negligence on part of the owner. Essentially, this could allow us as your qualified attorneys to navigate complexities more effectively ensuring justice done timely and efficiently

Carlson Bier takes pride in offering an individualized approach tailored specifically for every case assessment—which includes substantial experience dealing routinely with insurance companies while negotiating fair settlements post-dog attacks. We remain dedicated professionally towards achieving nothing but best positive outcomes — especially vital considering vast majority (over 80% by recent estimates) involve children who sustain far severe injuries than adult victims.

Healthcare costs following dog attacks can amount considerably—ranging anywhere from emergency medicine, reconstructive surgery, therapy sessions for emotional recovery, and not to mention any possible lost wages due downtime at work. The need for retaining competent legal representation becomes undisputedly clear in ensuring your rights are protected unwaveringly while seeking full restitution owed you according to law.

Additionally, our trusted team can aid proactive preventive steps including understanding leash laws specific to Illinois localities or identifying potential breed-based legislation may in turn help reduce such incidents future community wide; enforcing the adage—an ounce of prevention indeed is worth a pound of cure.

To reiterate:

– Knowledge about local dog ordinances combined with adherence advances societal safety.

– Legal redress accessible even if trespassing/provoking the animal wasn’t involved.

– Importance highlighting child-victims facing predominantly higher injury degrees.

At Carlson Bier we strive selflessly towards cultivating informed citizens better equipped navigating legal landscapes following personal injuries such as dog bites. We energetically champion rights of our clients securing rightful compensation they deserve and meticulously fight every step despite obstacles confront us during pursuit justice remained unfazed. Our commitment rooted deeply never settling less but exceeding client expectations adhering unchanging promise comprising core business ethic: Your Fight. Our Commitment.

Don’t let the financial stress of a dog bite incident overwhelm you further when resources exist to help alleviate these burdens. Click on the button below today to find out how much your case could be worth—we’re here committed wholly aiding you throughout this challenging ordeal crafting optimal avenue approaching fair comprehensive resolution effectively reflects unique circumstances surrounding your untimely unfortunate encounter experience faced diligently .

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Herrin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Herrin

Areas of Practice in Herrin

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering adept legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal help to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Trip Injuries

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on assisting victims of car accidents secure just remuneration for hurts and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Delivering professional legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Focused on delivering professional legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Focused on defending persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​