FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Herrin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident in Herrin, it’s crucial to consult with an experienced lawyer who understands the specific nuances of these types of cases. Carlson Bier is your ideal choice for this crucial role. Our law firm has excelled at protecting the rights and interests of clients involved in pedestrian accidents throughout Illinois. Cognizant of local regulations and intricacies, our attorneys skillfully tackle complexities that come along with such incidents, ensuring maximum compensation for emotional trauma or physical injuries endured by victims. The astute approach taken by Carlson Bier lawyers goes beyond handling just legal procedures; we work diligently to get justice served and assist our clients on their road to recovery from distressing events. What differentiates Carlson Bier is our team’s proficiency coupled with deep empathy towards personal injury victims which ensures optimal outcome adapted uniquely for each case we handle while never losing sight of overall client well-being alongside obtaining recompense through legal means.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Herrin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys understand the extensive legal intricacies associated with pedestrian accidents in Illinois. These situations are often traumatic and can have severe consequences that last a lifetime. As one of the leading law firms providing swift, reliable assistance for pedestrian accident claims in Illinois, we aim to provide detailed insight that will enable you to make an informed decision about your situation.

Pedestrian accidents involve numerous factors that can affect eligibility for compensation and its amount. With each case possessing unique elements, it is essential to recognize key aspects that could impact your claim:

• Determination of fault: This is a critical stage where the fault or negligence must be established. It might be the driver who was impaired or distracted while driving or not obeying traffic rules.

• Type of injuries incurred: Major injuries such as fractures, brain trauma or spinal cord damage usually lead to larger settlements compared to minor abrasions or contusions.

• Insurance coverage: The insurance policies carried both by you and the offending driver play a monumental role in any potential settlement.

These points reflect some fundamental elements considered during pedestrian accident cases. However, it’s also important to remember that specific laws pertaining to pedestrian safety govern rights for damages awarded.

As per Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-1002), drivers have a duty to exercise due care to avoid colliding with pedestrians – regardless if they’re disobeying vehicular traffic regulations or not. Any failure in meeting this standard may render them liable for damages caused through their negligent act.

Moreover, according to section 11-903(a) under Illinois law concerning crosswalks: all vehicles shall yield right-of-way when any vehicle has already entered intersection from different highway until movement within intersection has been completed; irrespective of whether signal-controlled intersection exists at location of crossings or not. So if you’ve been hit even though you were crossing appropriately at a crosswalk, know that the relevant statutes back your claim to compensation.

At Carlson Bier, we endeavor to minimize the emotional and legal burden of pedestrian accident victims. Our team is proficient in analyzing intricate details related to incidents and utilizing them effectively for negotiating a just settlement. We have an extensive understanding of Illinois’ vehicular laws that are relevant to such cases. Every situation is diligently evaluated before crafting comprehensive litigation strategies, ensuring maximal representation of your rights.

Further, it isn’t just about finding who’s at fault in the accident; it’s also about securing an assemblage of evidence that substantiates your claim. This may involve procuring surveillance footage, photographs from the scene, medical records detailing injuries sustained along with witness statements if available.

It’s important for victims not only familiarize themselves with their legal rights but also fully understand how these accidents can be prevented – actively contributing towards creating safer environments for pedestrians statewide.

Remember: pedestrian accidents are often complex where evidence can quickly dissipate. Prompt action following the accident increases chances towards successful recovery – both physically and legally.

Ending on this note – if or when you face devastating distress due uncontested negligence others while simply trying live ordinary life as pedestrian; remember that you’re not alone and you do not have walk this path without professional support.

Our attorneys at Carlson Bier will ensure your inherent right to compensation under the law is ardently defended against insurers driven by profit margins or negligent parties unwilling to accept responsibility.

We invite you now – take action immediately. Click on the button below so our expert team can provide immediate assistance; helping evaluate how much potentially worth case may actually be thereby putting control firmly back within hands where truly belongs!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Herrin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Herrin

Areas of Practice in Herrin

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending skilled legal help for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring professional legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering professional legal services to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Damages

Providing legal help for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Committed to helping patients of car accidents receive just settlement for damages and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Collision

Providing specialist legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Focused on extending compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at managing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Expert in assisting patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​