FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Highland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the crisis of a dog bite injury in Highland, you need the steadfast representation that Carlson Bier provides. Our firm possesses extensive knowledge and seasoned experience in personal injury law, specializing in cases involving dog bite injuries. At Carlson Bier, we understand not just the physical trauma associated with such incidents but also acknowledge their emotional aftermath. We strive to help victims receive rightful compensation for their pain, suffering and any incurred medical expenses. By choosing us as your legal ally, you will benefit from our dedicated advocacy towards holding negligent pet owners accountable under Illinois law. Despite being highly preventable through responsible pet ownership, unfortunate instances can occur even here in Highland where serious consequences may result from a seemingly harmless encounter with an untamed canine companion. It is during these times that relying on our expertise becomes vitaly beneficial to triumph over adversity; proving yourself righteously deserving of fair restitution becomes significantly easier when entrusted into the capable hands of Carlson Bier’s experienced attorneys who continually hone their focus on victory within this niche area.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Highland Illinois

At Carlson Bier, distinguished Illinois-based personal injury attorneys specialize in representing individuals who have been victim to dog bite injuries. Our primary motivation is providing premium quality guidance and ensuring justice for those whose lives have been impacted by these unfortunate circumstances.

Dog bites can result in dire consequences, ranging from physical harm to emotional trauma—creating a unique mixture of challenges for the injured party that requires personalized professional attention. As personal injury attorneys with seasoned experience in this area of law, we are exceedingly familiar with the nuances involved within dog bite cases.

This brings us to one critical point – misunderstanding concerning Dog Owner Liability laws can lead to unfair results. Illinois law states that not only does the owner bear responsibility when their pet attacks, but also if their dog’s behavior resulted in an injury—barring provocation or trespassing scenarios. It means you may be entitled to compensation even if damage was inflicted without actual biting.

From minor puncture wounds to severe maulings and fatal attacks, our team at Carlson Bier understands the gravity of these situations:

– Infections: Untreated bites can lead to bacterial infections including Pasteurella and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Ensuring access to necessary medical treatments forms part of your rightful compensation.

– Scars and Disfigurement: Bite victims often deal with repercussions including lifelong scars or disfigurement requiring expensive reconstructive surgeries.

– Psychological Trauma: Psychological effects such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or fear of dogs could manifest post-bite incident. These circumstances warrant psychological reparations that need due consideration during case assessment.

Professional legal assistance will enhance your ability to understand what avenues are available after experiencing a tragic event like a dog bite attack; especially true if navigating negotiations or litigation procedures against insurance companies who generally act quickly—and potentially under value claims—to resolve cases rapidly.

The adept attorneys at Carlson Bier endorse proactive consultation. An immediate legal response fosters prompt investigation, preservation of evidence and vital witness statements which are crucial for building a robust case on your behalf—this timeliness contributes towards maximizing potential compensation.

With the Carlson Bier law firm in your corner, you can expect:

– Comprehensive legal analysis.

– Personalized representation tailored as per individual needs.

– Calculations incorporating long-term medical expenses, lost work wages besides other costs associated with dog bite injury cases.

– Assistance with insurance claims process while protecting against undervaluation tactics commonly employed by insurers to diminish victim dues.

Moving forward after experiencing a dog bite injury is not an easy task—but our team at Carlson Bier is committed to easing this journey by advocating fiercely for your rights. We firmly believe no one should bear the mental or financial burden that arises from incidents caused by negligent pet owners.

Are you ready to take the next step and learn what justice looks like in your case? By clicking the button below, we will provide an estimate of how much your dog bite claim could potentially be worth. You have nothing to lose, yet so much to gain, in seeking sage guidance from our seasoned personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier. Let us stand up for you. Rest assured – your trust placed in us will help build a strong case meriting adequate reparation under Illinois state law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Highland Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Highland

Areas of Practice in Highland

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying adept legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Malpractice

Delivering dedicated legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Fall Accidents

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing representation for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Extending expert legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Harms

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Specializing in representing clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​