Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Highwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Spinal Cord Injuries can be life-altering, devastating experiences. These injuries require extensive medical care and often result in long-term disability that necessitates significant lifestyle adjustments. When such an injury is the consequence of someone else’s negligence or wrongful act, you deserve justice. It’s crucial to secure effective legal representation experienced in navigating these complex cases, like Carlson Bier. Recognized throughout Illinois for its exceptional service and dedication to clients’ rights, this law firm stands at the forefront of personal injury litigation with expertise on spinal cord injuries claims. With a deep understanding of both state laws and unique circumstances under which these injures can occur, Carlson Bier works diligently to ensure their clients receive proper compensation for damages sustained due to others’ negligence or wrongdoing – from loss of income & emotional suffering through future medical expenses provision – promising not just formidable legal representation but also empathy and commitment during such desperate times in your life every step towards achieving fair settlement.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Highwood Illinois

As a leader in the field of personal injury law, Carlson Bier aims to provide accurate and beneficial information for individuals who may be dealing with spinal cord injuries. These injuries are serious medical conditions often resulting from events like car accidents, falls, or acts of violence. Illnesses that damage the spine, such as cancer or arthritis can also cause spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries drastically impact the lives of victims and their loved ones. The nervous system is disrupted which means messages cannot travel between the brain and various parts of your body efficiently. There can be significant lifelong implications ranging from physical disabilities to emotional challenges. Understanding these nuances is vital when it comes to securing an appropriate compensation package if these sustained injuries are due to someone else’s negligence or recklessness.

• Types Of Spinal Cord Injuries: Spinal Cord Injuries range in severity based on where they occur along its length. They are commonly classified into complete and incomplete injuries. Complete spinal cord injuries result in total loss of function below the level of injury while incomplete causes partial loss.

• Symptoms: Loss of movement, sensation (including the ability to feel temperature), bowel, bladder control represents some critical symptoms associated with it.

• Treatment & Diagnosis: Diagnosis involves neurological inspections along with CT scans, MRI scans among others. The treatment depends on controlling symptoms and preventing further damage – leading towards Physical rehabilitation involving occupational therapy, psychological support among others

Carlson Bier has specifically mastered presentation compelling legal arguments before judges and juries alike considering all relevant aspects related to spinal cord injuries – including primary diagnosis reports , required future treatments and possible permanent adaptations to daily routines required post-accident.Therefore ensuring clients get compensated fully.

If affected by law’s negligence regarding safety norms causing undue harm; Victims are legally entitled to file a lawsuit under personal injury law focusing not only on pain & suffering compensation but also any lost income or predicted future financial losses as a consequence of injury.

Though Spinal Cord Injury claims can be quite difficult due to high intensity treatments and ongoing care needs required; Carlson Bier’s experience in articulating complex medical jargon into plain speak, presenting solid fact-based case rollovers – ensures clients are fully aware about the process and concludes with apt compensation received.

While we at Carlson Bier have cemented our legal legacy in Illinois, rest assured that it is backed by genuine service. We understand that approaching personal injury law matters dealing with spinal cord injuries can feel overwhelming. This is why our commitment goes beyond just preserving your rights.

Filing lawsuits seeking damages for spinal cord injuries consider numerous factors – Prospects for rehabilitation post-injury? What role does health insurance play? Anticipating future economic losses or additional living expenses perhaps?

Carlson Bier navigates you through various these questions using expert understanding of law combined with a caring go-to approach ensuring clients are comfortable throughout the trial.

Remember, your fight is our fight– If you believe your spinal cord injury resulted from another party’s negligent action or even if you’re unsure who was at fault – reach out to us today. No need to face this journey alone when comprehensive legal advice is merely one call away.

As a testimony to this commitment, once discussions conclude, clients often refer their friends and family members to us resulting in premium services provided consistently across years.

Here at Carlson Bier, we dedicate ourselves not just recovering maximum awards but also offer constant guidance navigating through frequent checkups managing trauma during physically challenging times so Life eventually continues thriving despite obstacles encountered on way making sure compensation received truly comparable against damage caused.

A click on button below connects directly starting over an informal discussion over potential recovery sum having worth absolute peace & zero financial disruptions during such moments of crisis. Get your query answered!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Highwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Highwood

Areas of Practice in Highwood

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying expert legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal help to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Trip Mishaps

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents receive appropriate recompense for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering adept legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Focused on ensuring specialized legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Committed to advocating for clients with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer