FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Hillcrest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When confronted with a potential case of medical malpractice, residents in Hillcrest know they need a trustworthy and exemplary advocate. In such turbulent times, relying on Carlson Bier is an astute choice to navigate complex legal waters effectively. Armed with a significant record of successful settlements across Illinois, their expertise in the intricate sphere of Medical Malpractice law stands unassailable. Attuned to the catastrophic implications that negligence can have on patients’ lives, Carlson Bier’s objective remains steadfast – securing justice for every client while mitigating future risks in healthcare delivery. The proficient team combines profound legal acumen with essential empathy delivering assurances beyond financial compensation – restoring faith and paving way towards healing for numerous grateful clients who have trusted them over the years amid desperate circumstances due to Healthcare practitioners’ mistakes or errors. Therefore, undeniably making them your first consideration upon suspecting any hint of medical malpractice implies not only seeking restitution but also cementing preventative measures for tomorrow’s patient safety landscape.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Hillcrest Illinois

Carlson Bier Associates is a premier law firm based in Illinois, focused on upholding your rights and fighting for fair compensation in the wake of personal injury incidents. Renowned among our various specialties is our impressive record in tackling tough Medical Malpractice cases, where we consistently demonstrate unparalleled legal prowess while advocating for patients who have suffered due to healthcare negligence.

Imagine being placed under medical care with the intention of healing, only for it to result in further trauma or distress because of ill practice by health professionals. Such scenarios fall under the domain of Medical Malpractice- an unfortunately common issue that patients often face unknowingly. It includes misdiagnosis, medication errors, surgical mistakes, and neglect during treatment among others. Victims of such unfortunate instances can find hope and possible recourse with the help of experienced attorneys like us at Carlson Bier.

Our team diligently works towards proving four key factors when pursuing a Medical Malpractice case:

• The existence of a doctor-patient relationship: Assuring there’s evidence to show you were indeed a patient.

• Breach of duty or negligence: The health professional was negligent or compromised standards resulting in harm.

• One’s injury led directly from this negligence: Revealing clearly how said negligence translated into your injury.

• Damage resulted from these injuries: Displaying financial loss or other significant hardship – physical or mental – caused by these initial injuries.

Understanding these points empowers you as a victim and client; it not only aids you gain clarity about what occurred but also enables you to shed light on potential scandals hiding behind white coats thus protecting future victims.

Navigating through the complexities involves extensive knowledge about both medicine and Illinois law – something which may seem daunting for any layman. That’s where skilled legal representatives play their part; Carlson Bier eases this journey by leveraging their deep understanding coupled with outstanding negotiation skills to assertively argue your case either inside courtrooms or during settlement discussions.

Remember that every situation is unique and success of a Medical Malpractice claim heavily depends on the specific circumstances surrounding that particular case. Timing also plays a crucial role since Illinois has a strict statute of limitations – under most circumstances, an action must be initiated within two years after the cause of action accrues. Therefore, don’t waste time in second thoughts or unnecessary delays.

Once you’ve decided to pursue justice for pain incurred from medical negligence, contact our experienced attorneys immediately. We promise to listen patiently and empathetically to your experience as we seek justice for you. From gathering the necessary evidence and prepping strong arguments, we help establish clear connections between specific acts of negligence and harm inflicted upon you by healthcare providers.

Knowledge is indeed empowering when dealing with such grave incidents as Medical Malpractice – it provides one with understanding about their rights, enabling them to take correct actions at the right times. At Carlson Bier, we are committed providing this knowledge along with unmatched legal guidance; partnering with us doesn’t just mean having seasoned lawyers at your side but being equipped with actionable insights.

You may still feel overwhelmed despite all information available here – keep in mind though, there’s more wisdom waiting behind a simple click below! Just press the button to find out how much compensation-justice your particular circumstance holds. Remember too it’s not just about monetary return but acknowledging injury caused due to another party’s erroneous act or neglect Thus taking up a stand against Medical misdemeanours doesn’t only benefit you personally but contributes towards overall societal welfare by holding wrongdoers accountable.

One can argue that every step taken against Medical Malpractice inadvertently pays tribute to Hippocrates’ original sentiments: ‘First do no harm’. Do so now by clicking below!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hillcrest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Hillcrest

Areas of Practice in Hillcrest

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Extending professional legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, extending skilled legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Fall Injuries

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Harms

Offering legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents gain appropriate payout for wounds and destruction.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring professional legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for damages.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to offering specialized legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in advocating for persons with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440