...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hinsdale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to seeking compensation for dog bite injuries, the legal representation of Carlson Bier has repeatedly proved indispensable. Strategically serving the Hinsdale surrounding communities, this reputable Illinois-based law firm specializes in handling dog bite injury claims with efficiency and precision. With an experienced team of personal injury lawyers committed to fighting for your rights, you can count on them to navigate through complex legal processes seamlessly. They understand the potential psychological trauma inflicted by a dog bite incident along with physical damages; hence they’re dedicated to ensuring all clients receive comprehensive remedies that go beyond healing wounds. Rooted in their fierce dedication is an empathetic approach that effectively pairs aggressive advocacy with compassionate counsel—an attribute which sets them distinctly apart from others in Illinois’s landscape of personal injury representation. When considering legal defense for dog bite injuries within or around Hinsdale vicinity, remember your claim’s success hinges significantly on who represents you— Make it Carlson Bier; unmatched proficiency makes the incomparable difference.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hinsdale Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be an emotionally and physically traumatic experience. The legal representatives at Carlson Bier understand this fact more than anyone else in Illinois. As personal injury attorneys, we are committed to ensuring that victims of dog bites receive the justice they deserve and the compensation to cover their medical expenses, pain, suffering, loss of earnings or other damages that resulted from the unfortunate incident.

One cannot understate the potential severity of dog bite injuries. Our team has seen cases where victims suffer deep tissue damage, nerve damage and disfigurement. Even less severe physical wounds can lead to serious infections like rabies or tetanus if they aren’t treated immediately. Victims also frequently report psychological trauma including post-traumatic stress disorder and a lasting fear of dogs which impact their day-to-day life long after their physical wounds healed.

A few important factors should be noted regarding dog bite law in Illinois:

• The state follows a ‘strict liability’ rule for dog bites which makes the owner liable for damages caused by their dogs even if it’s not previously shown any signs of aggression.

• However, liability may not apply if it is determined that the victim provoked the dog to attack thus inciting its natural defensive instincts.

• Dog owners have certain responsibilities towards society which include: avoiding letting their pet loose unattended; training them; taking measures against overly aggressive behavior among others.

This forms just an outline of what could potentially be a complex legal case depending on many specific circumstances such as breed-specific laws.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that early action can prove crucial in seeking compensation effectively. Collecting information about the incident (pictures/videos), seeking immediate medical care followed by reporting the incident officially are steps you should take following an attack. This could significantly strengthen your case as well providing much needed treatment promptly.

Some people may harbor doubts about whether they’re eligible for filing a claim due to reasons like knowing/treating kindly/familiarity with/at fault with the dog prior to the incident. To address such concerns and other queries, in every case, a comprehensive investigation will be undertaken by our team at Carlson Bier law firm to analyze all contributing factors before determining how to proceed further.

Engaging an experienced personal injury attorney can make a crucial difference in complex cases associated with severe injuries like these. Our litigation experts have extensive knowledge of Illinois laws pertaining dog bite incidents and are thorough professionals when it comes to handling such matters related to personal injury law. They work diligently for you ensuring that your rights are prioritized during negotiations or courtroom procedures while keeping you informed and assured every step of the way.

Abiding by Illinois laws we assure you we do not falsely advertise any physical office locations beyond our existing ones. Heartfelt empathy combined with legal expertise is what makes us more than just lawyers helping out victims – it instead forms the very heart of our ethos at Carlson Bier where justice is not just served but earned for each client, individually tailored according their specific needs.

Every case differs from another based on many unique circumstances associated with them. Therefore, for an accurate assessment regarding potential compensation amounts, kindly click on the button below; this would help determine a rough value estimation concerning your dog bite injury claim exclusively curated by ourselves who specialize in this particularly intricate aspect within personal injury law – The trusted attorneys serving Illinois at Carlson Bier await you anxiously.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hinsdale Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hinsdale

Areas of Practice in Hinsdale

Bike Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Providing skilled legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Extending legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for injuries and harm.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Incident

Delivering adept legal services for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Damages

Expert in offering dedicated legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​