...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Hinsdale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When pedestrian accidents occur, resulting in injury or loss of life, it is crucial to secure legal representation that understands what you’re going through. Carlson Bier, your best choice for a Pedestrian Accident attorney group in Illinois fully comprehends this need. We’ve served countless clients over the years with compassionate care and aggressive litigation. Our firm has built an impressive track record by successfully obtaining fair compensation for our clients’ injuries, medical expenses and lost wages due to unfortunate pedestrian-involved incidents.

Each case we handle is treated uniquely with strategies tailored to fit its specific details because at Carlson Bier there’s no such thing as a one-size-fits-all approach to justice.

Our commitment extends way beyond just winning cases; it encompasses client education about peculiarities of pedestrian accident laws prevalent in Illinois ensuring all-round satisfaction. Be rest assured knowing that your case will not be managed by assistants but directly handled by dedicated attorneys from beginning till end.

Choose Carlson Bier — committed allies who are determined to help you navigate struggles arising from pedestrian accidents while relentlessly pursuing optimal results for you; remember this isn’t just about law—it’s personal!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Hinsdale Illinois

Personal injury incidents can drastically impact life as you know it, often coming without warning and leaving a trail of distress physically, mentally, and financially. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in painstakingly turning the tables on this ordeal into a position for justice and recovery to ensure that victims regain control over their lives.

As Illinois’s leading personal injury attorney group, we understand that pedestrian accidents’ effects go beyond immediate physical injuries. These accidents can serve emotional distress and hefty medical bills, which is why our legal team at Carlson Bier is dedicated to ensuring every individual receives the compensation they deserve post-accident.

Pedestrian-related accident cases require meticulous exploration of various aspects: understanding Illinois law’s nuances concerning pedestrian rights, identifying liable parties with comprehensive proofs, establishing negligence for strong case-building and articulating damages accurately for commensurate compensation.

In addressing these complications related to pedestrian accidents:

• Pedestrian Rights: The law often assumes pedestrians have the right-of-way in most situations but also obliges them to observe specific safety regulations.

• Establishing Liability: Unveiling responsible parties includes not just drivers but potentially other entities like municipal corporations or private companies depending on circumstances like malfunctioning traffic lights or faulty road design.

• Proof of Negligence: Determining negligence involves proving that the defendant acted carelessly by breaching an obligation they owed towards safeguarding your safety as a pedestrian.

• Articulation of Damages: This entails documenting medical expenditures, potential future healthcare costs due to sustained injuries alongside non-economic damages such as pain, suffering or mental anguish.

At Carlson Bier, our skilled attorneys navigate through these complexities armed with deep legal knowledge and relentless dedication to client rights protection. Each case we handle imbibes our passion for justice system translation into tangible action – competent representation from start till successful resolution delivering optimal results per expectation.

Partnering with us ensures support from trustable allies who sympathize with your plight and will work tirelessly for winning your deserved compensation. You get an exceptional experience defined by timely communication updates, competent referral network to top medical specialists ensuring best possible recovery progress alongside expert legal counsel taking care of your claims process with immense diligence.

Despite the unfortunate occurrence of the accident, Carlson Bier strives to make your journey thereafter smooth and comforting. We operate on a contingency fee basis – meaning we only get paid when you do. This ensures our clients have access to superior legal representation without upfront costs or financial risk adding more woes onto their distressing scenario.

In this challenging time, entrusting a reputable personal injury attorney group like Carlson Bier can provide much-needed relief and assurance that someone is smartly fighting for your rights while you focus solely on recuperating.

Reach out today for a free consultation at no obligation or cost to discover how we can help regain control after pedestrian accidents derail efforts towards living fulfilling lives. The personalized attention each client case receives enhances chances for higher claim settlements because at Carlson Bier – every small detail matters when it comes to enacting justice!

As you plan the next steps in addressing your circumstance, consider taking advantage of our Pedestrian Accident Case Analysis tool located below. By clicking the button, you’ll gain access to details about what compensation amount might be recoverable given your accident specifics – all part of our commitment illuminating paths towards justice & successful recovery! At Carlson Bier–our mission extends beyond providing robust legal support–we stand beside integrity upholdment pledging unwavering commitment towards assisting victims regain hope during uncertain times that unintentionally engulfed them owing tragic incidents transforming normalcy into distress-ridden life phases demanding justification.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hinsdale Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Hinsdale

Areas of Practice in Hinsdale

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing adept legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal guidance to victims affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Incidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Providing specialist legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cognitive Harms

Dedicated to offering professional legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Trauma

Focused on representing clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​