FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Hodgkins

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been unfortunate enough to suffer a pedestrian accident in Hodgkins, do not forgo the assistance of an accomplished attorney group. Carlson Bier with their profound experience and skill are your go-to choice when seeking legal counsel in such devastating circumstances. They understand that navigating through complex legal issues can be overwhelming especially while nursing injuries from an accident. As professional personal injury lawyers, they will supportively guide you through every step ensuring your rights remain at forefront of the laws pertaining to Illinois State. The Carlson Bier team’s primary goal is to aid victims reclaim lost compensation due to these horrifying incidents by leveraging aggressive measures against negligent parties involved. Their broad knowledge within this particular field aids in determining fault, liability and kickstarts efficient case building designed solely around securing maximum compensation granted under state law limits. Count on Carlson Bier when it comes down to trusted versatile representation throughout grueling litigations; no uphill case is insurmountable with their tenacious drive for justice illuminating every potential path towards full restitution assuredly facilitated by compelling strategies meticulously built around clients’ individual needs.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Hodgkins Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a notable emphasis on pedestrian accidents. Our Illinois-based team comprehend the physical, emotional and economic impact such incidents may induce. Recognized for our professional expertise and relentless advocacy, we’re dedicated to ensuring you receive the justice and compensation you rightly deserve when involved in pedestrian-related mishaps.

Pedestrian accidents often result from a multitude of situations: a distracted driver failing to stop at crosswalks; reckless speeding in areas laden with foot-traffic; blatant disregard for traffic control devices or even drunk driving. Legislation exists to render protection to pedestrians but unfortunately, these laws are frequently breached, culminating in dire consequences for the unsuspecting individual on foot.

• Vehicles must yield to pedestrians at both marked and unmarked crosswalks.

• Speed limits must be adhered to especially near school zones or areas predominant with walkers.

• Drivers should never overtake other vehicles stopped at crosswalks as they might be allowing pedestrians to pass.

Breaking any of these rules potentially leads to severe injuries or tragic fatalities which give rise to legal action.

Regrettably, proving liability is typically challenging without comprehensive expert knowledge of statutes related to pedestrian rights within Illinois’ intricate legal environment. At Carlson Bier, we engage our vast experience in navigating through complex legal frameworks pertaining uniquely toward each case.

Most common injuries sustained include:

• Traumatic brain injuries (TBI),

• Spinal cord damage,

• Fractures, sprains & strains,

• Abrasions & lacerations,

These injuries not only inflict immediate physical trauma but often leave enduring complications disrupting lives financially and emotionally due to daunting medical bills or unforeseen unemployment respectively.

While no amount can fully populate the void left by many long-term repercussions, suitable compensation could greatly alleviate economic distress faced while focusing on recuperation endeavours. As your chosen firm, it would be Carlson Bier’s prerogative demonstrating the underlying culpability of opposing parties while advocating for maximum restitution through negotiation or trial.

Among many factors considered under compensation calculations, expenses related to medical treatment, loss of income capability, mental anguish and diminished quality of life predominantly get assessed among others. Offering reassurance in your time of hardship is our paramount concern during each stage of the legal process.

Although we pride ourselves on addressing queries promptly and explicitly explaining legal procedures without overwhelming technical jargon, it’s imperative understanding every case remains unique with differing variables influencing feasibility, theoretical approach and potential outcomes alike.

Equipped with resilient attorneys striving to surpass client expectations, rest assured knowing Carlson Bier always champions your interests effectively when embarking upon this daunting yet vital journey toward justice at such turbulent times.

Regardless of individual circumstances leading up to the incident or its consequent effects experienced since, it’s a point worth re-articulating; every step toward seeking reparations post-pedestrian accident needn’t be confronted alone. Recollection that empathy extends well beyond a professional relationship here at Carlson Bier allows us sharing not only the burden but mental fortitude throughout proceedings and beyond.

Before you go: In order to ascertain accountability accurately within Illinois’ extensively codified pedestrian law precedent for promising litigation accordingly – or if simply curious about what rights pedestrians should assert as minerals form in society’s hustle-bustle – we cordially invite taking advantage of an impromptu obligation-free consultation determining eligibility status together. So why stay uncertain? Follow us down the path toward unravelling lingering doubts so you can confidently understand just how valuable your triumph against adversity may truly merit by clicking the button below. At Carlson Bier where compassion meets professionality; dialogue becomes results. Insights await your click!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hodgkins Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Hodgkins

Areas of Practice in Hodgkins

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying specialist legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Accountability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Stumble Incidents

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents receive equitable remuneration for injuries and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering specialist legal support for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in providing compassionate legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in managing cases for people who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to defending individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​