FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Homer Glen

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with spinal cord injuries, it’s crucial to have a legal representation that not only understands the physical and emotional challenges you’re facing but also has practical expertise in navigating this specific type of personal injury law – Carlson Bier is exactly that. As a leading Illinois legal firm specializing in spinal cord injuries cases, our prowess emanates from years of vast experience, unrivaled dedication and an impressive track record of victories. Our profound knowledge allows us to provide professional advice tailored precisely for every unique situation we manage. We are committed to supporting Homer Glen community members by tirelessly advocating on their behalf without compromising their needs or wellbeing during such critical times. At Carlson Bier, we approach each case with sensitivity and drive necessary for attaining the most favorable outcome— holding those who caused your injury accountable while ensuring proper compensation for medical costs and lost wages among others due to spinal cord injuries. Advocate simply but powerfully; choose Carlson Bier as your legal champion!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Homer Glen Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in a myriad of personal injury cases, with a high degree of expertise and sensitivity on spinal cord injuries. A challenging occurrence can cause serious disruptions not just to the physical wellness of an individual, but their emotional and financial stability. Proving negligence leading to spinal cord damage involves painstaking legal navigation which our personnel is remarkably proficient at handling.

Spinal Cord Injuries typically result from violent incidents like automobile accidents or falls; however, medical errors during surgical procedures or incorrect administrations of epidurals are also frequent contributors. Such injuries often lead to partial or complete paralysis – conditions that require lifelong medical attention and assistance in daily life activities, subsequently affecting one’s ability to earn a living.

Some key points about Spinal Cord Injuries include:

• They can be either complete (resulting in total loss of sensory function below the point of injury) or incomplete (whereby some sensory functions remain).

• Most complications involve respiratory problems, heart issues, digestive disorders among others.

• Sustaining such an injury could necessitate modifications to your home for wheelchair accessibility – involving significant expenditure.

• Rehabilitation includes multiple therapies like physical therapy, occupational therapy as well as counseling sessions which can become exceedingly expensive.

In order to substantiate a claim related to spinal cord injuries it’s paramount to establish liability i.e., prove that the defendant’s negligence caused the injury. Ascertaining liability becomes easier when there is clear evidence that rules have been violated – like traffic rules in case of vehicle accidents. However, proving infringement under gray areas is more complicated: was medication oversight involved? Was carelessness during surgery decisive?

Thereon applying legal mechanisms such as comparative negligence rule where you may need expert representation in diminishing any asserted contributory negligence on your part mainly impacts compensation determination.

Many aspects contribute towards calculating fair settlement amounts for these life-altering events. Medical expenses – past, current and future ones owing to the persistent nature of these injuries – are a central consideration. Wages lost due to inability to work, either temporarily or permanently are added onto this. Further factors weighing into the calculation include quality of life alterations and loss of earning capability in cases of permanent impediment.

At Carlson Bier, we have unparalleled experience in dealing with spinal cord injury cases; our firm boasts an exceptional track record based on diligent representation for victorious outcomes. Our award-winning attorneys take time talking with you, understanding your specific situation, compiling evidence and formulating a compelling argument tailored just for you.

We pride ourselves in our extreme dedication towards achieving maximum compensation for our clients. Not being able to avoid merited fiscal support from defendants is something that defines us at Carolina Bier. You comprehend your hardships- physical and psychological trauma entailed by such incidents which is why we promise unwavering commitment from beginning till end.

Your trust is important to us – thus ensuring transparency throughout the process comes naturally to us without the need for any insistence. We explain everything that you want to know – working intricacies involved in your case, how court proceedings function and so forth.

Our esteemed lawyers provide advice free of charge initially – offering guidance about possible future course of action predicated on their professional judgment formed over many years’ worth active-legislation involvement alongside relentless pursuit for justice serving as cornerstone prompting victory after victory for satisfied clients all around Illinois state.

Now that we’ve elucidated how complex proving negligence can be along-with challenges surrounding fair settlement determination coupled with highlighting why Carlson Bier should be your number one choice given expertise-led strategies having established formidable reputation; do not hesitate contacting us immediately! Remember: hiring top-tier representation might engage significant investment upfront but benefits reaped far surpass it invariably!

Click on the button below solidifying managed faith granted preliminarily – ascertain potential compensatory amount for case you’re entrusted upon us! With dedicated alliance besides profound prowess borne out literally hundreds comparable successfully contested instances; we instill confidence, enabling you to focus solely on recovering emotionally and physically while legal concerns will be proficiently taken care of. We eagerly look forward to discussing things further very soon!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Homer Glen Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Homer Glen

Areas of Practice in Homer Glen

Cycling Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering specialist legal advice for patients of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing specialist legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal help to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Slip Occurrences

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents receive appropriate payout for wounds and harm.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Offering experienced legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for hurts.

Construction Crashes

Dedicated to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on advocating for patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​