FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Hometown

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a bicycle accident occurs in Hometown, trust only the finest Illinois law house: Carlson Bier. With extensive experience in handling personal injury cases across multiple categories, navigating Bicycle Accidents is one of our core expertise. Our suite of credible attorneys collaboratively work to ensure that your rights are respected and enforced coming with transparent communication at every step of the case – from consultation to representation. At Carlson Bier, we shoulder the burdens so you can focus solely on recovery; dedicatedly fighting for compensation duly deserved by you or your loved ones injured during a cycle mishap. Understanding bicycles provide less protection than motor vehicles prompting severe injuries post accidents aids us in proactively anticipating challenges our clientele might face while seeking justice tenaciously mitigating them – defining us as unmatched not just statewide but especially for those residing within Hometown who find themselves victims of such unfortunate incidents cementing Carlson Bier as an eminent choice when seeking expert counsel on Bicycle Accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Hometown Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier law firm, your trusted allies in navigating the legal intricacies of personal injury claims stemming from bicycle accidents. As an authoritative voice on Illinois’s landscape of personal injury law, our primary concern is securing justice for individuals whose lives have been disrupted due to unexpected incidents.

Bicycle accidents can occur in several ways, generally resulting from a collision with a motor vehicle or another cyclist, poor road conditions, product defects, or negligence. Every individual case is unique and warrants meticulous evaluation by our practiced attorneys who specialize in understanding the nuances of each situation.

Key considerations related to bicycle accidents include:

– Validation of fault: The task of verifying who should be held accountable for an accident can prove arduous. Our attorneys are adept at inspecting all aspects that led up to the incident – weather conditions, traffic signals, other vehicles involved – leaving no stone unturned.

– Assessing injuries: Injuries vary greatly in their severity and lasting impact. Whether you’re dealing with minor sprains or severe head trauma as a result of your accident, we fight relentlessly for your rightful compensation.

– Unraveling insurance complexities: Navigating insurance claim procedures can often add extra layers of confusion during these distressful times. From handling communication with insurers on your behalf to acquiring maximal settlements to cover healthcare costs – we bear the burden so you don’t have to.

At Carlson Bier, it’s essential that every client feels educated about their circumstances as they come into contact with legal terms and procedures which may initially seem daunting.

When discussing liability or determining the value of damages incurred after an accident involving a cyclist:

– Liability is affirmed based on ‘at-fault’ party recognition which indicates responsibility for causing damage or harm. It aids us in establishing whether you were partly at fault or completely innocent when expressing claims against others charged in an accident.

– Damages are monetary awards granted to victims who file successful personal injury lawsuits. The compensation computed for damages captures the financial burden incurred as a result of an accident which could encompass medical expenses, income loss due to inability to work, emotional distress, punitive damages and more.

Beneath all our practiced knowledge and intricate understanding of Illinois law rests one unshakeable goal – ensuring you feel secure throughout the post-accident journey. As you navigate through physical recovery and bureaucratic hurdles alike, there should be no added pressure borne out of uncertainty about your legal standing or fear of repercussions.

We hope this detailed insight into bicycle accidents has elevated your understanding and reassured you that when it comes to handling such complex circumstances – Carlson Bier is at your service!

Gaining insights on potential compensation amounts revolving around your case not only helps form realistic expectations but serves as motivation in moving forward through difficult times.

With years of experience serving individuals in Illinois affected by bicycle accidents, Carlson Bier aims to ensure comprehensive representation revealing the true value of each claim made on your behalf.

To uncover just how much your specific case may be worth based on individualized review conducted by our team, simply click on the button below. Let us guide you along the path toward justice with unwavering confidence and professionalism that makes us stand out from others in the field – You are not alone; we practice in solidarity!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hometown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hometown

Areas of Practice in Hometown

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering specialist legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, offering adept legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Tumble Injuries

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Damages

Offering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents secure equitable payout for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Accident

Providing adept legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on ensuring specialized legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal services to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to representing persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​