Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hoopeston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re searching for proficient legal representation following a dog bite injury, turn to the experienced team at Carlson Bier. Renowned within Illinois, we’re adept at handling cases of this nature with unparalleled diligence. Our attorneys are well-versed in intricate state laws pertaining to animal attacks and have distinguished themselves through proven expertise and substantial results secured for our clients. Facing such an ordeal can be daunting; however, swift action is critical in pursuing legal recourse post-injury. By choosing Carlson Bier as your advocates after a canine attack, our focused pursuit of justice will help alleviate your stress during a challenging period while securing compensation commensurate with your injuries’ gravity. Notably accomplished within personal injury law circles across Illinois State, trusting us ensures that all intricacies surrounding dog bites regulations don’t impact your case negatively but work towards achieving favorable outcomes instead.””

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hoopeston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases, including those involving dog bite injuries. As a reputable Illinois-based law firm, our commitment remains to uphold your rights and ensure justice is served if you or your loved ones fall victim to such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bite injuries can range from mild scrapes or puncture wounds to serious harm like infections, nerve damage, and even fatalities. These unpredictable events can occur anytime, anywhere but are more prevalent in certain areas due to breeds of dogs that reside there.

• Dog bites can cause physical pain: When a dog attacks, it can lead to severe physical harm including deep gashes or lacerations which may require stitches. In some extreme cases, surgery might be necessary.

• Dog bites can result in emotional trauma: Often overlooked is the psychological impact of the attack. Many victims experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and fear following the incident.

• Financial burden caused by dog bites: The medical costs from treating these injuries could be substantial on top of loss wages from inability to work during recovery process.

Navigating through the legal aspects surrounding a dog bite injury case might seem daunting especially when dealing with the aftermath of an attack; hence we at Carlson Bier endeavor to make this journey smoother for you.

Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ when it comes down to animal attacks; meaning owners are held accountable for their pet’s behavior irrespective whether they were aware of its aggressive tendencies or not. This eliminates any need to prove wrongful conduct on part of owner making it simpler for victims placing claims.

Recognizing key timelines within which claims should be placed is critical as well:

• You have two years from day of incident occurring – this is known as statute limitations.

Despite tough laws protecting victims‚ proving liability or negotiating compensation sum could still be complex tasks wherein having an experienced attorney aboard would significantly improve prospects of reaching successful outcome.

With vast knowledge regarding local laws and committed approach towards our clients‚ we at Carlson Bier are well-equipped to guide you through necessary legal procedures, assist in collating key evidence, negotiating compensation amount with involved parties and representing your interests if court intervention becomes unavoidable.

However critical is understanding each case’s potential – the kind of injuries sustained along with extent of severity‚ costs incurred for medical treatment‚ wages (if any) lost during recovery process or even degree of emotional trauma suffered can all factor in while calculating its worth. Even situations where a dog might not have bitten but caused injury by jumping on someone or knocking them down also qualify under personal injury claims.

At Carlson Bier, it’s more than just representation; we believe in empowering our clients with extensive knowledge letting you comprehend every aspect related to your case thereby enabling informed decisions around paths forward.

We urge you now to leverage this free opportunity provided below. By clicking the button beneath, you will be able take first step towards discovering what your case could actually be worth. Rest assured, there are no hidden charges involved. Find out today how much compensation lies within your reach! Remember: every second counts when it comes to claiming fair justice – act now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hoopeston Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hoopeston

Areas of Practice in Hoopeston

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending expert legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Accidents

Expert in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Focused on helping individuals of car accidents secure just recompense for injuries and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering specialist legal support for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for losses.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Damages

Expert in providing compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Focused on defending victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer