Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hopedale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury disrupts life unexpectedly; its aftermath often leaves individuals and families traumatized, financially drained, physically debilitated and with an urgent need for legal support. Seeking recovery claims is complex and requires experienced professionals like Carlson Bier who specialize in fighting Spinal Cord Injuries cases in Hopedale. Our seasoned attorneys offer comprehensive advice tailored to your specific situation. We are known for robustly defending our clients’ rights across Illinois, ultimately securing maximum compensation for their damages incurred.

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-altering implications of Spinal Cord injuries including extensive medical bills, loss of income earning capacity or quality of work-life balance every victim endures post-injury. Strategizing assertively yet empathetically, utilizing depositions from medical professionals substantiating evidence showcasing negligence is how we promise effective representation.

Trust us as your dedicated Spinal Cord Injury lawyers to untangle intricate laws favoring insurance companies over plaintiffs – navigating you safely through legal loopholes onto a path toward rightful recovery remains our unwavering commitment wherever you may reside within Illinois borders

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hopedale Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, esteemed Illinois-based law professionals who specialize in handling personal injury cases involving spinal cord injuries. Our focus is to help you navigate through the complexities of such harrowing experiences with consummate ease.

Spinal cord injuries are often life-altering events that can dramatically impact your quality of life and overall well-being. Such incidents result from a variety of circumstances ranging from automobile accidents, falls, acts of violence, to sports-related injuries. The repercussions can render you unable to perform daily tasks or maintain gainful employment; consequently giving rise to massive medical bills.

There are two basic types of spinal cord injuries: complete and incomplete. Complete spinal cord injuries involve a total loss of sensory and motor functions below the level of injury, while an incomplete spinal cord injury suggests some degree of sensory or motor function below the area affected.

Understanding these details enables you to have more control over your recovery process and advocate effectively for your rights during trials or settlements negotiations. And at Carlson Bier, we are equipped with comprehensive knowledge about the medical aspects related to spinal cord trauma as well as intricate legal matters linked with personal injury claims resulting from such conditions.

Here’s why trusting us could be beneficial:

– We comprehend Medicare policies thoroughly and fight tenaciously within the confines of standardized settlement procedures.

– We possess indisputable skills related to tort legislation encompassing critical issues like tort liability, negligent infliction, plus premises and product liabilities.

– We base our case assessments on pain-and-suffering evaluations which take into account emotional distress coupled with physical discomfort considerations.

– Resolute engagement in alternative dispute resolution methodologies including arbitration and mediation has been our forte.

Remember – when dealing with insurance companies after encountering a traumatic event such as a spinal cord injury it can seem daunting but choosing Carlson Bier provides you access not only an accomplished team accustomed to challenging insurance firms but also compassionate individuals committed towards safeguarding your interests aggressively on all fronts.

Navigating through spinal injury cases require specific understanding and skills. You’ll need a law firm that’s fully competent in Illinois injury laws, medical expenses, property damage, lost earnings, plus hurting-and suffering compensation claims. That’s where we come in.

At Carlson Bier, not only do we appreciate the enormous stress levels you are under given such injuries’ life-altering nature, but we also deploy our profound legal insight to ensure that justice is served. We stand by your side during these challenging times offering professional advice and guidance tailored towards achieving maximum redress for your predicament.

Spinal cord injuries have significant physiological effects which can trigger substantial emotional burdens as well as financial concerns. Therefore securing attorneys with vast experience like ours ensures smoother journeys towards fair compensations availing provision of appropriate rehabilitative resources required leading fulfilling lives despite such devastating occurrences.

While hoping never to encounter such tragedies involving spinal cord injuries, if you or any loved one ever find yourselves victimized due to another party’s negligence or willful misconduct anywhere across Illinois — let Carlson Bier help regain control of your life by pursuing rightful claim settlements within the precincts of prevailing personal injury legislation.

Do not endure undue hardship silently when experienced experts are available and ready to assist: Rid yourself from unnecessary worry about escalating medical costs or being incapable of providing for dependents because of reduced earning capabilities resultant from debilitating spinal cord injuries. Click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth so you can start taking back control over your situation–right here at Carlson Bier–your trusted partners through rough tides effectively guiding towards shores of deserved justice!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hopedale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hopedale

Areas of Practice in Hopedale

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving expert legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Offering specialist legal assistance for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Collision

Delivering experienced legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Traumas

Committed to delivering professional legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer