...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Humboldt

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from a dog bite injury in Humboldt, your best defense is the highly reputable Carlson Bier. This Illinois-based personal injury law firm specializes distinctly in mending the havoc wreaked by such unfortunate incidents. They come armed with extensive experience and expertise specifically centered around dog bite cases; integrating both compassion and compulsion to ensure victims get rightfully defended, and their compensation for damages maximized. The nuanced skillset of Carlson Bier’s attorneys ensures they navigate through complexities intrinsic to these types of injuries while maintaining an unwavering focus on client recovery so you can face tomorrow fearlessly! Whether it’s understanding intricate insurance company tactics or the science lying behind canine-related wounds – even within local legal stipulations – rest assured that choosing this accomplished team guarantees robust representation best suited for YOUR unique circumstances.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Humboldt Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand just how traumatic and life-altering dog bite injuries can be. With a full awareness of the physical, emotional, and financial burdens that come with such incidents, we dedicate our expertise to assist victims in seeking rightful compensation. As seasoned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we are deeply committed to helping those affected by dog bites navigate through their legal journeys with competence and compassion.

Dog bite injuries raise specific areas of concern. Below are some key elements to consider:

• Immediate Medical Attention: Seek emergency medical care promptly after a dog bite happens as proper treatment is crucial in preventing infection or any other complications.

• Documentation: Maintain precise records including photographs of your injuries and details surrounding the incident. These will play an important role in supporting your case.

• Legal Counsel: Pursuing claims for these types of injury is complex. It’s essential that you secure legal assistance from experienced professionals who have an extensive understanding of Illinois state laws related to this matter.

Your right to seek liability falls under the Illinois Animal Control Act which states that owners are responsible if their pet harms someone unprovoked. This implies holding pet owners accountable when others sustain harm due to their domestic animal’s actions unless the victim provoked the attack or was trespassing at the time of the incident.

At Carlson Bier, we assume complete responsibility for conducting thorough investigations into your case. Our attorneys meticulously assess multiple aspects including circumstances before the occurrence, potential negligence on part of defendants, and psychological effects alongside physical damage.

When it comes to assessing claim value during settlement proceedings, various factors come into play. The severity of your injuries, cost incurred in treatments along with any surgeries required due to infections or scarring constitute pertinent considerations. Other costs could include damaged property (if any), time missed from work leading to lost wages/income opportunities plus pain & suffering endured by victims post-incident.

Our commitment extends beyond simply recovering damages – rather, it involves working tirelessly each step to ensure justice is achieved in fair proportion to the grievance experienced. By assuring detailed claim evaluations and employing aggressive negotiation strategies, we strive to maximize the compensation received by our clients.

We regard our duty as end-to-end guides in this process – from initiating legal processes & disclosing your options to advocating for you during negotiations or courtroom trials if necessary. We exhibit unparalleled dedication and fortitude when fighting for your rights and helping you regain control of your life.

At Carlson Bier, passion drives us! Each case handled is embraced with full dedication, commitment, and perseverance. Our proactive approach has consistently enabled us to succeed on behalf of our clients, delivering them the committed representation they not only need but also rightly deserve given their circumstances.

Now comes the most crucial part- envisioning lifelines within lawsuits and seeing hope beyond injury- that’s where a skilled attorney leads. While mere empathy can’t undo damage done or pain inflicted, securing just recompense helps victims restore balance gradually by meeting requisite medical costs while compensating for lost wages until full recovery.

Based on all what’s been said thus far – Shouldn’t you be seeking rightful compensation against those responsible for your distress? Understandably yes! And there’s no better way than consulting with seasoned legal experts knowledgeable about personal injury claims related to dog bite incidents specific to Illinois state laws.

Now imagine having a robust team of competent attorneys rallying behind – fighting fiercely yet compassionately so you don’t struggle alone through complexities inherent in such disputes. That’s precisely what Carlson Bier offers!

And remember: You have nothing to lose since we operate strictly on contingency bases, meaning you only pay us after achieving successful settlements or awards concerning your case(s).

The next step? Get started by clicking the button below for an accurate assessment regarding potential worthiness attached to your dog bite scenario currently at hand. Realize tangible benefits available upon pursuing justified legal recourse against violators – Let Carlson Bier guide you back onto paths leading recovery & revival!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Humboldt Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Humboldt

Areas of Practice in Humboldt

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering adept legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Offering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering professional legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Tumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to guiding patients of car accidents obtain just payout for harms and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending expert legal representation for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to delivering specialized legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal assistance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer