...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hurst

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Hurst, one should consider obtaining expert legal representation. Carlson Bier is the law firm that exemplifies this expertise and professionalism. They are uniquely prepared to handle these complex cases efficiently, having gained prominence across Illinois for defending the rights of dog bite victims. Their specialized knowledge proves invaluable when navigating intricacies associated with animal attacks, ensuring you reap maximum benefits from your case. Unlike general practice lawyers who handle various personal injury cases, the Carlson Bier group has honed their skillset exclusively towards dog bite incidents making them a superior choice when seeking resolutions in potentially emotionally draining circumstances. Through guided advice and rigorous pursuit of justice based on years of experience dealing within Illinois laws concerning animal bites and related accidents; they stand as an unmatched beacon to residents hoping for just compensation for damages suffered due to canine aggression incidences.Dot-shapedInsertulton Boilerplate Content

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hurst Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical trauma that dog bite injuries can cause, and we are passionately committed to aggressively advocating for compensation on behalf of our clients. Based in Illinois, our primary objective is ensuring you secure the remuneration you deserve while navigating this complex legal terrain. Our team of attorneys possesses an extensive level of expertise and a relentless dedication to protecting your rights.

Dog bites injure about 4.5 million Americans annually according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The ramifications may range from minor skin abrasions or infections to devastating fatal attacks. In many cases, victims require immediate emergency care followed by grueling therapy sessions and reconstructive surgical procedures which often result in overwhelming medical expenses.

• One critical aspect when it comes to dog bite injuries is understanding Illinois’ Dog Bite Statute (510 ILCS 5/16), which holds the owner “liable for all damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a lawful place.”

• Additionally, victims should note that pursuing legal redress should be done within two years from the date of injury – missing this period could mean waiving your right to claim compensation under Illinois’ Statue of Limitations law.

Our personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier meticulously evaluate each case we handle, comprehending its unique circumstances before offering tailored representation aimed at securing maximum damage recovery. With significant experience handling such suits against negligent pet owners who fail to control their dogs properly under Illinois statutes, rest assured we will tirelessly litigate every facet of your case.

We’re more than just lawyers – think of us as allies taking on insurance companies that regularly deny or diminish rightful claims. We utilize our extensive resources like experienced investigators who collect vital evidence supporting liability claims and seasoned negotiators well-versed with articulating robust arguments compelling enough for fair settlements.

Recovery compensation might cover but not limited to:

1) Medical Expenses: This includes current hospitalization costs, future medical treatments related to the injury, and any necessary physical therapy.

2) Pain & Suffering: Emotional distress, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, or anxiety caused by the incident.

3) Lost Wages: If injuries resulted in loss of income due to absence from work or reduced capacity to earn.

In addition to this phenomenal team within our fold at Carlson Bier, we also extend our services on a contingency basis so that you don’t owe us anything unless your case is won. And while every case may vary based on its unique circumstances, be assured that our attorneys will pursue all avenues available for maximum compensation.

Wherever you are across Illinois state, Carlson Bier represents your interests efficiently and effectively. Please note that it does not matter whether you were bitten in a public place or whilst lawfully present on private property or an unprovoked attack – if someone else’s dog bit you without provocation while you were acting peaceably and anywhere lawfully permitted – they should be held accountable for their negligence under Illinois law.

Gleaning over vast resources online may leave prospective clients overwhelmed by often contrasting pieces of advice concerning personal injury lawsuits related to dog-bite incidents. To help cut through this noise with robust expertise tailored around your unique scenario, remember this- no amount of literature substitutes having an experienced attorney who intimately understands the nuances involved in such cases. Click on the button below – let’s figure out how much your case is worth together as partners determined for prudent justice backed within firmly established legal frameworks stipulated by Illinois State Laws!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hurst Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hurst

Areas of Practice in Hurst

Bike Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving professional legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Carelessness

Offering expert legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering professional legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Mishaps

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for wounds and damages.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering experienced legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Mishaps

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Focused on delivering expert legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​