FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Hurst

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accident in Hurst, it’s crucial that you entrust your case to seasoned legal professionals like Carlson Bier. We understand how disruptive these accidents can be, often leading to severe injuries, trauma, and financial strain. Our team is dedicated to championing your cause and ensuring you get the compensation you rightly deserve. Unyieldingly committed to our clients’ rights and well-being; each lawyer at Carlson Bier effectively navigates complex Illinois laws surrounding pedestrian accidents on your behalf through strategic diligence borne from substantial experience in this practice area. We believe there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach when it comes to legal representation – we tailor our counsel considering every client’s unique circumstances for optimized results. By choosing Carlson Bier as your personal injury lawyers after a pedestrian accident in Hurst, rest assured that unmatched expertise within Illinois law pairs with compassionate client care – all aimed at helping you return life back onto steady footing sooner rather than later.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Hurst Illinois

Pedestrian accidents can lead to serious injuries that drastically change the course of one’s life. These tragic incidents often leave victims and their families facing substantial medical bills, debilitating physical pain, depression from loss of quality of life, and a number of other challenges. At Carlson Bier, we understand these struggles well as seasoned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois with an emphasis on pedestrian accident cases.

When pedestrians are involved in auto accidents or other motor vehicle-related mishaps, most likely they will bear the brunt of the impact due to lack of protective gear. Not being encased in tons of metal leaves them vulnerable to catastrophic injuries such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord damage causing paralysis or lesser degrees of mobility constraints, fractured bones needing complex surgeries among others. Frequently devastating repercussions lead to high medical costs not only for immediate treatment but also ongoing physical therapy or neurorehabilitation often required afterwards.

There are diverse determinants which amplify the probability of pedestrian mishaps. Some crucial factors include:

• Distracted driving: When drivers split attention between watching out for road users and undue activities like texting while driving.

• Drunk Driving: Alcohol-impaired drivers create hazardous situations leading to severe collisions involving pedestrians.

• Speeding: Speedsters usually fail to react promptly to sudden appearance by a pedestrian hence resultant fatal crashes.

Besides proving negligence there is profound need understanding multiple issues affecting recovery after a pedestrian mishap claim- widespread damages linked hardships financial constraints due ever-rising medical expenses lost wages permanent disability etcetera that you may be entitled for compensation. Ensuring hefty insurance companies don’t have upper hand during settlement negotiations you need legal prowess compassion involvement at every stage constantly looking after your best interests which is exactly what you get when deciding on our firm Carlson Bier Partnering gives solid edge possibility securing optimal resolution suit simplifying daunting maze legal procedures presenting case emphatically robust manner.

We engender trust confidence through ethical practices diligence while ensuring firsthand assistance our clients. Our attorneys stand ready to aggressively protect your rights, pursuing every viable angle for compensation on your behalf. We ensure optimal resolution that adequately addresses the full scope of hardships endured due to a pedestrian accident by:

• Investigating all aspects of the accident

• Documenting all related expenses and lost wages due to inability to work

• Negotiating with insurance providers assertively for an adequate settlement amount

Understanding various nuances complexities tied obtaining rightful reimbursement paramount during pedestrian injury claims Unclear laws meddling few different parties’ interests seeking advantage often complicate such cases Yet right approach legal expert unravel complexities amplify chances securing fair restitution.

Carlson Bier is a prime example of this thoughtful and aggressive representation in action – we don’t allow big insurance companies or negligent parties to bully our clients into accepting less than they deserve. With us protecting your rights, you are never alone throughout the twisted course of legal processes – advocating passionately so that justice can be served; pain, suffering, and financial damages fully compensated!

Given the potential complexity of pedestrian accidents cases and their surrounding laws, it’s important not just to consult any lawyer but rather trust experts who truly understand the intricacies connected to these specific situations. To know more about how much value might be attached to your distinct case click on the button below for personalized details without delay! Secure your path forward with capable advocates beside you at Carlson Bier where committed support effective solutions await heartening prospects towards brighter tomorrow amidst adversarial circumstances.”

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hurst Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Hurst

Areas of Practice in Hurst

Bicycle Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing specialist legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering specialist legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Harms

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents gain equitable recompense for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Crash

Providing expert legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in extending professional legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Committed to assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​