...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Hyde Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is your staunch advocate when it comes to navigating the aftermath of a traumatic dog bite injury. As seasoned personal injury lawyers, our in-depth understanding of Illinois law and proven expertise in handling dog bite cases ensure that we deliver comprehensive legal services to protect victims’ rights. We meticulously investigate every aspect of your case, holding accountable those responsible for the incident while advocating tirelessly for maximum compensation on your behalf. Carlson Bier understands that these traumatizing incidents can have long-standing effects- physical, emotional and financial setbacks alike. Thus, we provide steadfast support throughout this challenging ordeal by asserting our decades-long litigation experience specifically tailored towards canine aggression scenarios across Illinois including Hyde Park vicinity – a dedication combed with unmatched adeptness ensuring optimal recourse avenues are pursued relentlessly – culminating into beneficial outcomes vested primarily in clients’ best interests even within intricate jurisdictions like Hyde Park’s; always remember – at Carlson Bier you’re not just another statistic as each pursuit matters greatly!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Hyde Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in providing expert legal services to victims of personal injuries across Illinois. We comprehend the overwhelming effects a dog bite incident can bring; physical and emotional pain aside, medical bills and other possible implications such as time away from work add further stress. Whether you, or your loved one, have unfortunately been bitten by a canine, understanding the legalities surrounding these incidents is crucial for fair compensation.

Dog bites could lead to deep wounds, broken bones or even infections like rabies; in severe cases they cause psychological trauma. Amongst all this complexity – Carlson Bier stands firmly with you. Cornerstones of our approach include justice pursuit and moral support. Our adept attorneys delve deeply into each case to manifest their expertise.

Here’s what you need to know about dog bite injuries:

• Dog Owners Responsibility – In Illinois, under the Animal Control Act (ACA), dog owners are held accountable for any unjustified attacks perpetrated by their pets provided that the victim was conducting lawfully during the occurrence.

• Proving Negligence – The act of proving negligence on part of the owner may not be necessary all times because Illinois follows ‘strict liability’ pertinent to dog bites.

• Strict Liability – As per strict liability rule, regardless of how careful a pet owner has been previously, he/she will be responsible if their dog inflicts an injury.

• Compensation – Every case varies but generally speaking damages could cover costs related to medical expenses inflicted by the attack, counselling & therapy suitable for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) arising after a traumatic incident like dog bite.

At Carlson Bier we understand that navigating through all these complexities can seem daunting especially whilst also managing consequences suffered due to an unfortunate event. Hence why turning towards experienced guidance becomes integral at such times. We offer full scope representation- from guiding you about every detail of ACA laws maintained within technical jargon present in insurance documents. Fill out summaries on your behalf to negotiating with insurance companies – landing you the compensation and justice that aligns with our client-centric approach.

While each case is unique, having a seasoned law firm by your side can significantly streamline the process and improve outcomes. Here’s how:

• Case Evaluation – We start by extensively examining details of incident, analyzing evidence such as medical reports.

• Advocacy – Representing interests against others involved parties including dog owners and insurance firms.

• Management – Dealing with all paperwork; filing necessary documentation on your behalf from initial claim to completion.

We fight for every injured victim with outstanding perseverance that has proven record of establishing successful settlements & winning verdicts in favour of our clientele across various personal injury incidents including dog bite cases.

Keeping in mind Illinois law specifics regarding advertising location- we assure clients regardless their geographical spot within Illinois boundaries; Carlson Bier maintains its commitment towards providing meticulous legal aid guided by one core factor: achieving client’s best interest.

By the close of this information-packed rundown, it’s clear to see why partnering with experienced hands like Carlson Bier would be instrumental for anyone dealing with aftermath of a dog bite attack. From understanding complex legal jargon to relentlessly fighting for your rights- we’ve got you covered. Lastly, if you’re still wondering ‘how much might my case be worth?’ – don’t speculate any longer! Click on the button below right now where our advisors sit ready to provide all requisite guidance hence initiating an era of assurance replacing anxiety. Let’s move forward together – Carlson Bier at helm guiding towards fair justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hyde Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Hyde Park

Areas of Practice in Hyde Park

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending expert legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Delivering professional legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal help to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Professional in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for wounds and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Collision

Extending professional legal representation for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Construction Incidents

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Injuries

Focused on offering specialized legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Committed to representing persons with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​