FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Illiopolis

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Illiopolis, dog bite incidents necessitate expert legal assistance to secure rightful compensation. Carlson Bier, a superior authority in personal injury law with deep roots in Illinois, is the ideal choice for representation in such cases. Our proficiency extends over an array of scenarios involving canine-inflicted injuries. Having extensive experience dealing specifically with dog bite injury claims sets us ahead of many others when it comes to understanding the intricate details and nuances of these complex cases. The navigational prowess Carlson Bier displays in handling legislation like the Illinois Animal Control Act ensures a solid case setup for our clients encountering dog-related harm litigation. A specialized team deeply committed and relentless promises careful analysis, adept negotiation skills and aggressive advocacy if need be – all aimed at upholding client welfare on top priority! Trusting your case within Illiopolis area to Carlson Bier means absolute assurance that every legal avenue will explored for achieving maximum possible compensation you rightly deserve after enduring a tormentous ordeal caused by hazardous dogs.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Illiopolis Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the shock and pain that can follow a sudden dog bite attack. Expert attorneys based in Illinois, our team is dedicated to securing justice for victims of such traumatic incidents. Dog bite injuries aren’t just physically painful; they’re emotionally distressing too. They can leave lifelong scars or result in internal injuries that demand immediate medical attention and long-term treatment. Rest assured, Illinois law upholds your right to seek compensation when you’ve been attacked by someone else’s pet.

Firstly, it’s essential to know about the concept of ‘strict liability,’ prevalent in many U.S states including Illinois. According to this principle, pet owners are held responsible if their pets cause harm to anyone unless the victim provoked the pet unnecessarily or trespassed on private property without consent. This makes tracking accountability for these damages simpler as it does not hinge on demonstrating neglect or mismanagement from the pet owner.

Some key factors should be noted regarding dog bite injury claims:

• The capability to prove that the dog caused your injury

• Verification of your non-provocative behavior towards the animal

• Ensuring no violation of any sort constituted trespass

These evidence points navigate your claim process and provide us ample ground for constructing a strong case aimed at thoroughly protecting your rights.

Additionally, it’s vital to acknowledge how damaging a dog bite can truly be — disfigurement, nerve damage, psychological trauma – all life-altering impacts demanding substantial recovery time both physically and mentally. Hence, arriving at an appropriate compensation sum isn’t merely about covering upfront medical bills; instead determining equitable repayment also encompasses lost workdays due to hospital visits and therapy sessions along with future medical needs ensuing from post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) triggered by this terrifying episode.

This brings us back full circle – addressing these elaborate provisions under personal injury cases requires specialized legal expertise which rests at core of what we offer at Carlson Bier. We relentlessly advocate for the rights of dog bite victims, employing every legal mechanism and resource available to ensure they receive fair compensation. We handle every case personally, providing professional advice and compassionate support throughout this challenging journey.

It’s important to note that making a personal injury claim doesn’t only protect your interests but also serves as an effective deterrent against pet negligence. It underlines the importance of responsible pet ownership – thereby fostering safety measures meant to prevent future incidents. Thus, taking a stand today can help systematically lower the risk of such occurrences tomorrow.

Given understanding all these legal intricacies can be overwhelming, our team at Carlson Bier is ready to stand beside you navigating this intricate web to lead you towards justice and recovery. Our goal isn’t limited to winning compensations; more importantly, we strive to fortify your faith in the system ensuring it stands up promptly meeting not just immediate needs but long-term requirements too.

We believe in turning adversity into action. Consequently, if you’ve been a victim of a dog bite incident, don’t hesitate in seeking out help urgently. The sooner we begin work on your case, faster we can progress toward resolution – offering peace and closure while foundations get laid for reliable recuperation module with time-tested tactics shaping road ahead.

Remember – You are not alone in this fight. With Carlson Bier by your side, justice won’t remain elusive or daunting—every step taken is surefooted moving towards rightful closure matching stringency of ordeal suffered.

Now’s the time for reckoning – reach out now! All it takes is one click below permitting us fill you in just how much your case could potentially fetch allowing full scale restitution opening ways towards normalized living away from haunting shadows cast by upsetting trauma endured post sudden dog-bite violence thrown at.”

With expert guidance around rules governing Illinois law intricacies teamed up with detailed insights about your specific circumstances courtesy Carlson Bier—you have nothing left pondering about! Allow us working effectively towards optimum functionality aided by our experience shaping practical solutions.

Your new beginning awaits on the other side of the button below. Find out today how much your case is worth, begin your journey to justice with Carlson Bier now! A swift click stands between you and potential compensation marking victory over adversity encountered. Embrace this chance wholeheartedly – because at core of every struggle we find seeds sown for tomorrow’s victory bred amidst today’s apparent predicaments.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Illiopolis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Illiopolis

Areas of Practice in Illiopolis

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving specialist legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Providing experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Malpractice

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Fall Incidents

Professional in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents obtain fair compensation for injuries and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing specialist legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Building Crashes

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Specializing in delivering specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in representing victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440