FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ina

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a distressing event such as a dog bite injury occurs in Ina, turning to Carlson Bier for legal representation can make significant difference. As an Illinois-based law firm with exceptional experience in personal injury lawsuits, we understand the gravity of dog-related injuries and are steadfastly committed to helping victims seek justice. Our proven track record includes multiple victories in complex cases like these, ensuring you’re entrusting your claim with attorneys who truly excel in their field. At Carlson Bier, our team is comprised of hard-nosed lawyers who fight relentlessly for clients’ rights against big insurance companies that may try to water down claims or minimize them entirely. With thorough investigation skills and key understanding of Illinois statutes pertaining to animal bites, we strive tirelessly towards obtaining maximal compensation for physical harm, emotional trauma and other losses endured by victims. Trusting us means having personalized attention throughout every step of the process while consistently being updated on your case’s progress; because at Carlson Bier – Your Rights Matter! Therefore when considering representation for words: Dog Bite Injuries related matters – remember the name ‘Carlson Bier’.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ina Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the traumatic ordeals that victims of dog bite injuries endure. As dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our mission is to provide comprehensive legal services specially aimed at helping you navigate through the complexities surrounding these unfortunate incidents efficiently and effectively. Ensuring that you are fairly compensated for your pain, suffering as well as any medical expenses incurred, is a core tenet that drives us.

A key fact to remember about dog bite incidents in Illinois is their widespread nature and frequency. Each year there are tens of thousands of reported cases. Beyond the physical pain and distress, it’s essential to realize such instances often lead to emotional trauma,and can even result in severe infants which may require extensive hospitalization or rehabilitation efforts.

• The importance of immediate medical treatment: Quick attention from a healthcare professional not only aids your health recovery prospects but plays a crucial role in documenting your injuries which becomes invaluable evidence if you opt for legal recourse.

• Importance of contacting authorities promptly: Reporting the incident to local animal control will ensure an official record of the event which further strengthens your case.

• Understanding liability laws: In Illinois’ strict liability state status means that typically dog owners are liable for damages caused by their pets biting someone without provocation on public property – or when lawfully present on private property.

Navigating through the metrics and intricacies involved invariably necessitates appropriate jaw guidance and where our experts come into play. Our seasoned team’s provision of clear advice intertwined with responsiveness forms distinct hallmarks ingrained within our approach towards preparing a strong foundation for your potential lawsuit.

We place immense value on educating our clients; many misconceptions surround who can be held responsible after a severe dog bite accident:

– Dog Owners: They bear responsibility under Illinois law unless they can prove their pet was provoked by you.

– Landlords: If landlords knowingly allow dangerous dogs on their property they could also potentially be held liable

– Animal Keepers: Individuals tasked with controlling or watching over the dog at the moment of your injury.

With Carlson Bier representation you get a team committed to exceptional service, providing clients with strategic legal advice and representation in all areas of personal injury law. Trusting us remarkably means that you no longer have to worry about tangled bureaucracy or risk making mistakes that might negatively affect essential aspects of your case such as the compensation received.

Remember, we operate under contingency fee arrangements – this assures our interests align perfectly with yours – we only win if YOU do. With every claim being different, assessing its accurate value ordinarily requires a careful appraisal of all injuries sustained, evidence collected alongside other damages incurred like income loss from work absences due to injuries.

You might be questioning “So what is my claim potentially worth?” The answer invariably differs on a case-by-case basis based on a range of factors, from extent and nature of injuries suffered, applicable laws together with whether liability can successfully be proven. We have conceived an interactive tool designed to ensure you gain insights into aspects surrounding potential worth associated with similar cases.

So are you ready for the next step? Click on the button below right now! Explore how much strength your case holds and unlock critical details regarding how much YOUR unique case could potentially be valued at! Separate yourself from pondering over ‘What-if’s”, connect today for concrete direction uniquely suited to your circumstances delivered by our passionate experts at Carlson Bier who champion relentless pursuit towards delivering justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ina Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ina

Areas of Practice in Ina

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Giving expert legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Trip Occurrences

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Semi Collision

Delivering adept legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in providing compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Focused on representing patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​