...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Iuka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Iuka, securing legal representation from the right firm is crucial. The skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier are proficient in personal injury law and offer specialized advice for dog bite cases. Their knowledge of Illinois state laws governing these incidents coupled with a track record of successful judgments provide an extensive layer of protection to victims through this traumatic phase. Navigating medical bills, ownership disputes or insurance complications need not be stressful when you have experienced counsel from Carlson Bier by your side. They prioritize your recovery and rights above all while rigorously fighting for fair compensation that covers medical costs and potential psychological trauma suffered through the ordeal. Engaging Carlson Bier creates a formidable defense against being shortchanged by insurance companies reluctant to meet just claim amounts.

Trusting our expert team with your case means placing your trust in proven experience, dedicated client care, and unwavering pursuit of justice after a devastating dog bite incident in Iuka.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Iuka Illinois

When you need an experienced law firm to handle a case of dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier stands out as the premier choice. Our professional attorneys have substantial legal experience and expertise in dealing with personal injury cases, particularly those related to dog bites.

Dog bite injuries can be dangerous and traumatic experiences that often lead to severe physical harm and mental distress. These incidents are surprisingly common in Illinois, causing victims significant pain and suffering that could last for years or even a lifetime. Carlson Bier is well-versed in handling such challenging situations with care and precision, bringing justice to our clients while ensuring they receive the consequential damages they deserve.

In navigating this complex legal space, there are crucial points that one must consider:

• Under Illinois law, our state operates on strict liability regarding dog attacks which means the owners of dogs involved in attacks hold absolute responsibility.

• The statute of limitations requires victims to file claims within two years from the date of the incident.

• Medical proof demonstrating that your injuries result directly from a dog attack greatly boosts your claim’s success chances.

Understanding these key points can significantly enhance your compensation scope by presenting a strong argument for tangible and intangible losses incurred due to serious bodily injury or lost wages owing to recovery period absence from work.

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures proficient assistance based firmly on statutes pertaining specifically to personal injury laws in Illinois. We guide survivors past complicated procedures, demystifying ambiguous terms while protecting their rights every step of the way. Moreover, we represent most victims without upfront fees until we win compensations desired thereby making it financially manageable for everyone irrespective of their economic standing.

Our comprehensive approach encompasses collecting evidence such as medical records, interviewing witnesses along with investigating past complaints against both dogs and their respective owners. Client-centered support while keeping all lines open 24/7 helps our patrons remain looped into processes under review at any given point.

The notion resonates with the essence of quality over quantity since what matters most is ensuring you receive full and fair compensation. Succinctly, at Carlson Bier, your fight becomes our fight.

Ensuring a trusted partnership with Carlson Bier works towards mitigating the negative impact of dog bite injuries on victims’ lives. We strive for earnest fulfillment of duties in obtaining rightful justice for affected individuals and their families by consistently providing dedicated assistance from start to finish.

To ensure that every detail gets adequate attention, we limit our caseloads. This approach enables us to provide each client with personalized service. Our clients are more than just case numbers; they are people who need help during difficult times. We take this responsibility very seriously and strive tirelessly to secure positive outcomes for every ‘Carlson Bier’ client.

In conclusion, if you or a loved one has been traumatized by a canine attack incident, let the experienced Illinois personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier assist you towards victory! For expert legal advice tailored specifically to meet your needs, choose us as your trustworthy partner in seeking justice for dog bite injuries.

Make sure not to leave any money on the table- remember that insurance companies have teams of lawyers representing their interests so having an expert looking out for yours can be crucial in securing fair settlements. Let’s not waste any more time pondering- click on the button below now to find out how much your case could potentially be worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Iuka Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Iuka

Areas of Practice in Iuka

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Supplying skilled legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending expert legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Professional in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents gain reasonable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Semi Collision

Extending specialist legal advice for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Construction Incidents

Focused on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to ensuring compassionate legal representation for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on representing patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​