Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Iuka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a pedestrian accident disrupts your life, turning to a trusted legal partner like Carlson Bier can make the road to justice less daunting. Offering thorough representation for individuals victimized by negligent drivers in Iuka and across Illinois, we possess unfaltering dedication and tenacious advocacy skills. Our seasoned attorneys navigate complexities of the law with absolute precision, fighting relentlessly against unfair settlements. Experience has made us recognize how significantly these accidents shatter lives- imposing physical suffering, emotional turmoil, and financial hardship. We firmly believe that victims deserve compassionate support and aggressive pursuit of maximum compensation possible. Backed by our extensive knowledge on local traffic rules along with updated state legislation regarding pedestrians’ rights – Carlson Bier will leave no stone unturned in holding responsible parties accountable via cogent litigation stratagems vital for success in these intricate cases.

Contrary to dealing directly with insurance companies that aim to minimize payouts—you are now represented ensuring protection at utmost priority while fostering smoother process towards recovery from this unfortunate event— your confidence warranted when partnering with Carlson Bier as your Pedestrian Accident Attorney group.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Iuka Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to providing expert legal counsel for those who have been victims of pedestrian accidents. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our firm has represented countless clients and helped them navigate the complex terrain of personal injury law. We strive to use our wealth of knowledge and experience to educate visitors about pedestrian accident claims – understanding what it truly entails can help empower victims and their families as they seek justice.

Pedestrian accidents typically occur when motorists fail to yield at crosswalks or do not adhere to traffic signals. Such accidents often result in severe injuries such as head trauma, spinal cord injuries, broken bones or even fatal harm. This underscores how crucial it is that swift legal action be taken where your rights are concerned; every moment counts after an unfortunate incident like this occurs.

• Victims of pedestrian accidents may be eligible for compensation covering not just medical expenses but also loss of income, pain and suffering, emotional distress among other losses.

• Proving liability in pedestrian accident cases requires demonstrating negligence on the part of the motorist involved.

• Accident reconstruction experts could provide essential insight into establishing fault during lawsuit proceedings.

The intricacies surrounding a pedestrian accident claim make thoughtful legal representation indispensable. Our experienced team at Carlson Bier delve deep into each case – uncovering evidence, negotiating with insurance companies, holding accountable parties responsible while striving ceaselessly towards helping you obtain maximum recovery.

One critical aspect one should note is that statutes governing timely filing apply when it comes to these types of lawsuits—it’s known as a statute of limitations—and missing this timeline could jeopardize your ability to receive monetary compensation altogether. Hence procuring adept legal aid swiftly cannot be overstated enough.

Adjusting after an accident isn’t easy; dealing with physical pain coupled with emotional turmoil proves challenging for many victims. What’s more unsettling is having the burden of skyrocketing medical bills—funds you possibly didn’t budget for are now required urgently which can be incredibly overwhelming to say the least.

That’s where we come in—the legal professionals at Carlson Bier strive tirelessly to relieve you of these daunting affairs, dedicating our time and resources in pursuit of ensuring that justice is served and your best interests are represented compellingly. We persevere so that you don’t have to.

Safety on the roads is a shared responsibility—motorists owe a duty of care towards pedestrians as much as they do other road users. When this isn’t adhered to leading up to unfortunate incidents, appropriate recompense should follow suit. Our team believes in promoting not just pedestrian rights but also illumination of safety measures resulting from diligent advocacy around pedestrian accidents.

Know that you’re not alone through this trying period. We understand what an unexpected incident like this does to one’s life – that’s why our commitments go beyond just providing superior legal counsel – we’re instrumental in lifting some of the emotional burdens too, putting your wellbeing and peace of mind at the core of all we do.

Are you or your loved ones dealing with repercussions from a pedestrian accident? It may feel like everything has been turned upside down; remember—you don’t have to navigate these choppy waters alone. Engage us today for thorough representation tailor-made for you as per Illinois laws guided by your unique scenario. Click on the button below to find out how much your case could truly be worth; let’s work together towards securing fair compensation and charting a path dedicated toward healing and justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Iuka Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Iuka

Areas of Practice in Iuka

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending specialist legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Fall Incidents

Professional in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents gain fair remuneration for damages and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in providing compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Harm

Committed to defending patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer