...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Jacksonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Understanding the severity of Dog Bite Injuries and their associated trauma, Carlson Bier delivers unparalleled legal representation for victims in Jacksonville. Specializing in personal injury law, our knowledge-based approach enables us to adeptly handle complex dog bite cases while ardently protecting victims’ rights. With a history marked by successful verdicts and settlements for clients across the breadth of Illinois, appointing Carlson Bier as your legal ally ensures dedicated attention to every detail of your case. Our stellar reputation is built on core values that prioritize client welfare over everything else; such dedication allows us to deliver optimum results each time. At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe in obtaining justice for those suffering from negligent or irresponsible pet owners causing Dog Bite Injuries. A compassionate team with relentless commitment empowers us to effectively advocate for you amidst an often-challenging path towards recovery and compensation claims. Trust Carlson Bier – our tenacity makes your fight ours too.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Jacksonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to seeking justice for clients who have been the victim of dog bite injuries. Based in Illinois, our personal injury attorneys understand the long-lasting impact and repercussions a seemingly minor event like a dog bite can have on an individual’s life.

Dog bites can result in severe physical and emotional damage that often goes overlooked; however, it is essential to realize these are serious incidents which warrant legal attention. Each year across America thousands of dog-related injuries occur, with grave ramifications such as permanent scarring, psychological trauma, and even death. As dedicated personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier, we believe no one should go through this alone or uncompensated.

Understanding Dog Bite Law in Illinois is challenging for most; however, you don’t need to navigate these waters by yourself – that’s why we’re here. Under the Illinois Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/), if a victim did not provoke the dog and they were acting peacefully when bitten on any public way or legally on private property, they can seek compensation from the owner or keeper of that dog. There’s also strict liability under this act—meaning a proven offender cannot absolve liability even if they took precautions or had no knowledge of their pet being harmful.

Key things you should know about Dog Bite Laws in Illinois include:

– The statute of limitations: In general terms, this refers to how much time you have after an incident to file your claim. For cases involving dog bites within Illinois it is two years.

– Contributory negligence: You may still collect damages if your own negligence contributed less than 50% towards causing your harm.

– ‘One-Bite’ rule doesn’t apply: Unlike some states where dogs get ‘one-free-bite’, under strict liability Illinois does not regard whether the owner was aware of their pet’s aggressive behavior upon proving causation.

The aftermath following a traumatic experience like a canine attack can be overwhelming, which is where the intervention of legal experts becomes instrumental. From procuring medical records validating physical injury to mental health assessments demonstrating emotional turmoil, our accomplished personal injury lawyers deftly assemble compelling evidence enhancing your claim’s credibility.

Beyond just ensuring that you receive adequate compensation for immediate medical costs such as hospital bills or occupational therapy fees, we also strive to seek redress for future repercussions of your bite wound. The effects can take longer to surface and might include intensive psychological counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) induced by this terrifying incident, cosmetic surgery necessity due to ugly scar formation, lost work hours during the recovery period or reduced working ability ensuing from an inflicted disability.

We’ve designed an easy-to-use online tool that can give you a rough estimate of what your dog bite case could potentially be worth using a variety of factors related to your specific situation – But remember every dog-bite case is unique. So do not accept the number showed on screen as final. Always consult with experienced professionals like us at Carlson Bier in Illinois who understand local legislation for accurate information about potential compensation claims.

Lawyers here at the distinguished law firm of Carlson Bier stand assertively beside victims who have suffered under these distressing circumstances providing expert counsel through all stages of litigation. Our unwavering commitment has helped numerous persons regain control over their life achieving justice against negligent pet owners and public entities responsible for regulatory non-compliance leading up to their suffering.

If you’ve been afflicted with serious wounds or sustained severe damage because of a dog attack, contact Carlson Bier today. As passionate defenders fighting tooth and nail to secure victim rights while delivering optimal results tailored towards each client’s requirement reflecting empathetic personalized representation isn’t merely our job but indeed our duty.

Finally, taking action has never been easier – Simply click on the button below and find out how much your case is worth right now! You don’t need to suffer in silence or deal with the repercussions alone; click below, and let Carlson Bier stand by you through your journey to justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Jacksonville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Jacksonville

Areas of Practice in Jacksonville

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying skilled legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Offering specialist legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, delivering skilled legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Tumble Occurrences

Professional in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Focused on helping patients of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Delivering experienced legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Concentrated on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Specializing in advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer