FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Jerome

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Jerome and seeking expert counsel for spinal cord injuries cases, look no further than Carlson Bier. Specializing in personal injury law, we bring unparalleled expertise to the table when it comes to rigorously representing victims of devastating spinal cord injuries. Our exceptional track record testifies our commitment as we ardently strive for justice and fair compensation for clients grappling with life-altering conditions due to such injuries. Given that every case is unique, your situation deserves tailored strategies derived from years of litigating diverse lawsuits, making us atypical amongst other attorney groups serving Illinois residents. The dedicated lawyers at Carlson Bier take pride in their meticulous investigation skills ensuring a thorough understanding of each case intricacy – essential knowledge that engenders maximum potential recompense during negotiations or trial proceedings if necessary. Trust Carlson Bier, where client needs are prioritized and assertively championed – paramount service motivated by unwavering dedication to protect the rights of those ensnared by catastrophic physical adversity from spinal cord traumas.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Jerome Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating effects of spinal cord injuries. As an established personal injury law firm in Illinois, our mission is to educate, support and legally represent those who have faced such unanticipated adversities.

Spinal cord injuries can result from a series of events such as motor vehicle accidents, falls or work-related accidents. They typically lead to two types of paralysis: Paraplegia, affecting all or part of the trunk, legs and pelvic organs; and Quadriplegia encompassing arms, hands, trunk, legs and pelvic organs. It’s vital to know the level at which your spinal cord was injured because it directly affects the parts of your body where function may be lost.

• A cervical (neck) injury usually causes loss in function

in both arms and legs.

• The extent of disability due to thoracic or lumbar

spine injuries depends on the specific nerves affected.

• Sacral spine injuries mainly affect the hip muscles and

pelvis with little to no control over bladder or bowel movement.

At every step surrounding these daunting medical challenges, legal matters often get sidelined. This is where our team steps in – We carry out comprehensive investigations into these incidents determining their cause while ensuring adequate compensation for victims suffering debilitating disabilities resulting from these ghastly episodes.

Prompt action means better outcomes – Operating within Illinois’ two-year statute limitations for personal injury cases governs how quickly actions need to commence post-injury conditions are identified. Beyond assisting with navigating intricate statutory intricacies- our experienced lawyers will ensure claims are processed efficiently minimizing further stressful delays for you during painful recuperation periods.

We cannot run away from hard facts – Spinal cord injuries come with astronomical costs that last a lifetime beyond preeminent levels of pain and suffering physically mentally emotionally severely impacting life’s quality overall. Statistics suggest first year expenses already nearing $350000-$1 million approximating almost 5 million across victims’ lifetimes. Recovering these enormous costs battling insurance companies and standing up against negligent parties causing disastrous consequences; demands skillfully adept legal representation.

Securing your rights is our prime prerogative – Our clients’ interests take precedence over everything else when we represent you, leaving no stone unturned uncovering all possible sources of recovery ensuring maximum compensations. Recklessness or intentional harm perpetuated by another individual; defective products leading to harmful incidents; unsafe conditions at premises or work sites accountable under the Illinois Premises Liability Act – We meticulously explore every potential liability avenue.

Medical negligence also plays a major role in spinal cord injuries which includes but not limited to surgeries going horribly awry; delayed diagnoses; that has unfortunately carved a separate niche for medical malpractice lawsuits within personal injury law where we hold guilty professionals accountable ensuring meticulous care while handing delicate situations such incredibly devastating injuries like this one are.

Our resolution is steadfast – To help individuals navigate through complex legalities tied with life-altering spinal cord injuries while sensitively dealing with overwhelming stresses that follow catastrophic accidents. Together, let’s pledge towards advancing justice holding wrongdoers responsible ethically morally legally bound by longstanding service traditions Carlson Bier proudly abides by.

Now, here’s a chance for you to take the first step towards making an informed decision about pressing spinal cord injures litigation matters. As defined experts specialized in spinal cord injury law, we’ll be glad to provide an obligation-free confidential discussion pertaining any potential claims you might have and prospective compensation estimates customized as per specific injury circumstances. Click on the button below and let us help determine what your case may realistically be worth facts taken into account individual unique scenarios considering long-term implications internal injuries beyond physically visible wounds ultimately treading personalised paths tailored suitably recovering rightfully deserved damages staying true our client commitment at Carlson Bier Associates Law Firm delivering impactful value every step bridging tragic past towards hopeful future together justly adequately amicably.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Jerome Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Jerome

Areas of Practice in Jerome

Cycling Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing specialist legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending specialist legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering expert legal services to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Fall Accidents

Adept in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Dedicated to assisting patients of car accidents gain reasonable remuneration for harms and harm.

Bike Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Mishap

Providing specialist legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal services to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Expert in assisting persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440