FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Johnsburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When confronted with dog bite injuries, your primary focus should always be on swift recovery. However, understanding the legal implications is equally critical to ensure fair compensation for incurred damages. In such scenarios, count on Carlson Bier — a renowned personal injury lawyer group in Illinois specializing in dog bite incidents. Our expert team has unparalleled ability and knowledge to navigate challenging litigation processes adeptly and assertively advocate for injured victims’ rights amidst these traumatic experiences. With our proven track record of successful outcomes under Illinois’s complex canine laws, we maximize every possible advantage while minimizing your stress during this trying time. We engage compassionate yet proactive strategies tailored uniquely to each client’s situation, providing personalized attention they deserve while aggressively pursuing their claims or settlements out-of-court if allowable by law but still securing deserved amounts covering medical expenses and related losses efficiently. Turn to Carlson Bier for intricate dog bite injuries cases; experience glowingly validated confidence reflecting our exceptional competence- where result-driven commitment meets unwavering excellence!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Johnsburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to representing victims of various personal injuries, including dog bite incidents. Understanding the extensive implications these injuries can have on your physical and mental health, as well as overall quality of life is our utmost concern. In fact, in a state like Illinois where every year hundreds of people suffer from unprovoked attacks by dogs resulting in profound emotional scars and substantial medical bills, staying aware and informed about your legal options becomes an imperative.

Dog bite injuries can be severe and traumatic with far-reaching consequences. The effects may range from psychological trauma, potential infections to physical damage that might require surgical repair. A few key aspects to consider when it comes to dog bites include:

– Type of injury: Dog bite injuries go beyond cuts or lacerations. They could lead to nerve damage in extreme cases which would necessitate complex medical surgeries.

– Proving Liability: Illinois law operates under the statute that holds a pet owner liable if their dog attacks or injures anyone without provocation while they’re lawfully present at the location.

– Filing a claim: The sooner you file your claim after the injury occurs, the better chances you have for getting fair compensation.

Experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier keep themselves abreast with evolving laws related to personal harm like dog bites along with encompassing legal technicalities and insurance pitfalls too often ignored by others but essential for winning claims.

Victims of canine assaults bear not just physical discomfort but financial hardships due to hospital bills along with pain and suffering that echoes long past their discharge date. Their path towards recovery—long-drawn-out recuperation period coupled with expensive treatment plans—is challenging enough without needing the added stress surrounding initial investigations following such incidents.

Being constantly up-to-date on relevant case laws has helped our team secure rightful compensations for numerous clients who’ve encounter unimaginable turmoil owing to someone else’s negligence. Remember – while each situation is unique; securing proper representation produces the best results. The critical elements for any dog bite case in Illinois involve:

– Establishing that the defendant owned the dog

– Demonstrating that you, as the plaintiff, did not provoke the dog

– Proving that you had a legal right to be in the place where your injury occurred

The intriguing aspect about dog bite laws over here lies within its academy of ‘strict liability’ facet. This doctrine prescribes how it doesn’t matter if an owner knew concededly or should’ve known about their pet’s propensity to bite; if their animal injured someone without provocation – they’re liable regardless.

Carlson Bier prides itself on client-centered service drawing from extensive understanding of underlying factors coupled with nuances specific to personal injuries law like canine assault claims.

We acknowledge how every incident is unique just like individuals bearing such harrowing experiences and provide personalized counseling—ensuring your questions are answered promptly, and our lines remain open for communication regarding progress on your case. In fact, bolstered by effective negotiation skills and courtroom acumen – we strive relentlessly towards urging defendants into acknowledging victims’ sufferings through adequate compensations.

Ensuring sound representation during crippling times isn’t merely a measure of rightful monetary assistance but acknowledgment towards mental duress encountered by tormented victims post situations beyond their control impacting lives irrevocably.

Conculsively, if you or a loved one have suffered an unfortunate dog bite injury, you do not need to bear this burden alone. Our team at Carlson Bier is ready to stand by your side and guide you through your legal rights while aiding you throughout your road to recovery.

Take time today to find out more about the excellent services we offer including professional legal aid concerning valid compensation claims for canine assaults. Click on the button below now and fill out our simple online form—we’re keen on helping build solid cases against entities responsible ensuring maximum entitlement over compensations legally deserved.

Victim of a dog bite? Don’t let medical fees gnaw at your peace of mind. Give us the opportunity to fight for the remuneration you deserve. How much is your case worth? Click below – find out now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Johnsburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Johnsburg

Areas of Practice in Johnsburg

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Giving adept legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Offering professional legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Trip Accidents

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Harms

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents gain fair compensation for wounds and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Incident

Extending professional legal services for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to supporting persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​