Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Johnsburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering the life-altering impact of a spinal cord injury, it’s crucial to have legal representation you can trust – that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. As seasoned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we offer comprehensive expertise and dedicated advocacy for spinal cord injuries cases. Our years of experience equip us with valuable insight into the complexities of these cases; understanding how such traumatic events can affect your life is vital for securing just compensation. Proactive communication fosters a partnership characterized by shared purpose – representing you diligently is our primary goal at Carlson Bier. We prioritize cultivating an attorney-client relationship founded on transparency, respect, and trustworthiness to alleviate any stress amid your recovery journey. With consistently high success rates backing our practice record, entrusting us with your case ensures sound advice and effective strategies tailored to build a compelling claim favoring your interests – no matter where you are located. Make Carlson Bier part of your path towards healing by providing unwavering support coupled with exceptional legal service during this challenging time as a reliable advocate always standing beside you.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Johnsburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in Personal Injury Law, with a focused expertise on Spinal Cord Injuries. Understanding the intricate frameworks of anatomy and law can be overwhelming and challenging, especially when you are dealing with such a traumatic experience. As professionals grounded in both these realms, our aim is to provide comprehensive information that can help you navigate through this crisis and make informed decisions.

Spinal Cord Injuries often occur as a result of accidents or severe violence. They may significantly impact your livelihood by altering mobility, bodily functions and overall quality of life. The subsequent medical expenses alongside loss of earning capacity compound the financial burdens for victims who have fallen prey to such injuries due to another party’s negligence.

• Severity categorization: Considered amongst the gravest forms of physical harm, spinal cord injuries can range from mild (any sudden loss of strength or sensation) to severe (permanent changes in body’s strength, sensation and other functionalities).

• Common causes: Some standard incidents leading to spinal cord injuries include vehicular accidents, falls, sports-related activities and incidence of violence like gunshot wounds.

• Consequences: Depending on where the injury occurs along the spine, effects could vary drastically further divided into two broad types known as complete (complete loss of function below injury site) & incomplete injuries (partial loss).

The far-reaching implications associated with Spinal Cord Injuries necessitate legal assistance to ensure rightful compensation for your losses. Recognized as an experienced Personal Injury Attorney Group in Illinois, at Carlson Bier we are well versed with intricacies involved around personal injury cases specifically pertaining to spinal cord injuries. Our team combines astute legal counsel backed by compassionate representation that reinforces our commitment towards securing justice for our clients while offsetting their emotional trauma with solid support.

We proudly serve every corner Illinois but given specific mandates under state jurisdiction; it’s mandated for us to state unequivocally that though we aren’t based out of Johnsburg, our dedication to serving and seeing justice exalted goes beyond locational configurations.

• Legal framework: Illinois law operates under Comparative Negligence system which means even if you were partly at fault, you can still seek damages for spinal cord injury but such compensation will be reduced by your level of responsibility.

• Statute of limitations: In Illinois, the time limit to file a personal injury lawsuit after Spinal Cord Injury is generally two years from the date of accident thus proactive action becomes crucial.

Remember, any communication shared with insurance companies post-incident could potentially affect your claim value. Therefore, it may be in your best interest to engage legal help promptly post an incident for guiding you meticulously through every stage involved in asserting rightful claims while seamlessly maneuvering through complexities & legalese involved around Personal Injury Laws pertaining to Spinal Cord Injuries.

In dire situations that call for legal action, pivotal decisions made should not be clouded by emotional turmoil or lack of understanding about legal perimeters. Your fight for justice needs to be fortified with skillful representation and strategic counsel strongly embedded in the ethos of Carlson Bier. It’s not just about knowing how much your case is worth; it’s also about reclaiming lost peace & stability disrupted due to unforeseen circumstances. Seeking right aids at right time becomes crucially important. Don’t navigate this terrain alone; let us shoulder this burden together with you.

Hence as a concluding note from this repository compiled on spinal chord injuries catering applicable laws under jurisdiction of Illinois state, we want you realise that there are resources available amidst crisis offering guidance hand-in-hand till successive resolution and one of them awaits underneath these lines boxed as “Find out how much my case is worth” button inviting a click that might just prove transformational diminishing prevailing uncertainties owing to Spinal Cord Injury induced chaos affirming our core belief ingrained deeply – You’re never alone when Carlson Bier stands alongside!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Johnsburg Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Johnsburg

Areas of Practice in Johnsburg

Bike Incidents

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing adept legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending professional legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on helping clients of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Collision

Delivering specialist legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Focused on extending professional legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Committed to supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer