FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Joliet

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you suffer a dog bite injury in Joliet, seeking legal counsel is utmost. Carlson Bier, an expert personal injury law firm in Illinois, tops the list of choices. Skilled and knowledgeable lawyers at Carlson Bier attentively handle Dog Bite Injuries cases bringing their vast experience to bear and providing aggressive representation for victims in order to seek maximum compensation. Their approach prioritizes your needs; understanding that each case is unique they formulate strategies tailored specifically for your situation. They have established a reputation as defenders who never shy away from pursuing justice relentlessly even against formidable opponents or complex situations. Known for their commitment towards clients’ rights and welfare, the Carlson Bier team works furtively to ensure best possible outcomes – whether through negotiation or trial litigation. With high success rate on dog bite cases already under its belt, it’s telling why many consider this proficient law firm when faced with such distressing moments – such as being bitten by a dog- because they understand more than anyone else what it takes to succeed when stakes are so high .

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Joliet Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be traumatic, causing both physical and emotional distress. As Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we have gained a deep understanding of these types of legal cases. Our experience has shown us the importance of pursuing justice for victims who suffer from injuries caused by dog bites.

A dog bite injury is more than just a physical wound; it can result in serious complications. These may include infections like rabies or capnocytophaga, permanent nerve damage, scarring or disfigurement and psychological trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It’s important to acknowledge that every case carries its own unique circumstances and complexities which must be thoroughly examined for accurate representation.

• In depth knowledge: At Carlson Bier, our attorneys bring a wealth of understanding about Illinois state laws related to dog bites. We are equipped to interpret the specifics regulated under the Animal Control Act that holds owners ‘strictly liable’ for any harm their pet causes.

• Comprehensive Assistance: From gathering necessary evidence to navigating complex negotiations with insurance companies, our team is committed to managing all aspects of your claim professionally and diligently.

• Experience-backed strategies: Drawing on years of courtroom expertise, our lawyers devise compelling arguments aimed at maximizing your entitlements for medical expenses, lost income if you’ve been unable to work due to your injuries and compensation for pain and suffering you might have experienced.

Remember – even if it seems like a minor incident now, some effects of a dog bite injury only become apparent over time – missed opportunity cost being one example. Delays could hinder building a strong case since reliable witnesses may forget crucial details or tangible evidence might get lost.

We understand the intense challenge you’re facing after experiencing a violent ordealing such as this. That’s why consultation with our empathetic but determined attorneys will provide invaluable insights into how long you have until filing deadline according the Illinois Statute of Limitations, what to expect from the legal proceedings ahead and how to prepare for them.

Let us take some of that burden off you. Carlson Bier is committed to fighting relentlessly on your behalf so you can focus on healing. We step into your shoes to understand your story better which makes our representation more personalized and impactful in court. Our team works tirelessly to ensure we get you the compensation deserved, advocating fearlessly against even the toughest opposition.

Going it alone can lead to misunderstanding critical elements of Illinois dog bite laws or receiving under-compensation from insurance companies who might pressurize victims into signing agreements quickly for lesser amounts than they are entitled.

To offer peace-of-mind during this strenuous time, Carlson Bier operates on contingency basis – this means we bear all expenditure through the course of lawsuit and only charge a fee when we secure a win for you. If providing personal service, treating clients with compassion while guaranteeing uncompromisingly tough negotiations is what you’re seeking – then we are confident that partnering with Carlson Bier will be an absolutely wise choice.

We appreciate your courage in taking action towards rectifying wrongs imposed upon you due to a negligent dog owner’s actions. To learn more about how much your case may potentially be worth, please engage with us further by clicking on the button below. Trust in Carlson Bier: Where understanding meets experience and commitment – always dedicated to prioritizing justice for our clients above everything else.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Joliet Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Joliet

Areas of Practice in Joliet

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Providing specialist legal services for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal help for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Focused on helping victims of car accidents gain equitable compensation for wounds and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Delivering adept legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Expert in offering dedicated legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Dedicated to advocating for victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440