FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Joliet

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident in Joliet, securing legal representation should be your primary concern. Carlson Bier is the firm-of-choice for victims of such accidents in this area. With considerable experience and proven expertise, our group of personal injury attorneys knows what it takes to win fights for justice against reckless drivers and insurance companies who may try to undervalue your claim. Attorneys at Carlson Bier are known for their uncompromising approach toward ensuring maximum compensation for clients affected by pedestrian accidents – whether they result from distracted driving, failed yield attempts or drunk driving incidents. We meticulously build each case with care taking into account every detail about the injuries suffered, potential future medical costs, lost wages among other factors that affect your quality of life post-accident. Trust us at Carlson Bier when seeking accountability and financial recovery after a traumatic pedestrian accident; we prioritize you because to us justice matters! Remember: Pedestrian Accident cases require expertise drawn from knowledge, skillful negotiation & aggressive litigation—and that’s exactly what defines Carlton Biers’ approach.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Joliet Illinois

At the renowned Carlson Bier law firm, our highly experienced Illinois personal injury attorneys understand the complexities and challenges that come with pedestrian accidents. We are dedicated to representing individuals who have suffered harm or loss due to such incidents, ensuring they receive the justice they rightly deserve.

Pedestrian accidents can lead to serious physical injuries, emotional trauma, and hefty financial burdens from medical bills and lost wages. When you are hit by a vehicle as a pedestrian in Illinois, your life can suddenly change in an instant causing considerable upheaval and distress.

One of the key areas we look into during such cases is establishing liability. Ascertaining who was responsible for your accident is crucial in seeking compensation. In many instances these may involve:

– Drivers not yielding right of way to pedestrians at crosswalks.

– Speeding or reckless driving especially in densely populated areas.

– Distractions like using mobile phones while driving.

– Impaired vision due to weather conditions or blind spots.

– Ignoring traffic signals or signs.

All personal injury claims operate under what is known as statute limitations which essentially means there’s a deadline for filing a claim following an accident. In Illinois this period lasts two years but may vary depending on specific circumstances surrounding your case like age or disability.

Navigating through insurance paperwork and legal procedures can be overwhelming for victims dealing with post-trauma emotions and injuries after an accident. Our tenacious team here at Carlson Bier are well versed in these matters providing tailored assistance every step of the way. We take pride in advocating fiercely on behalf of our clients ensuring their rights remain preserved throughout the entire legal process.

We also scrutinize any offer made by insurance companies given their tendency to minimize payouts wherever possible; taking advantage of those unfamiliar with intricate insurance protocols and negligence laws.We assist victims assess whether an offered settlement truly compensates their pain,suffering , medical expenses alongside other intangible damages available under Illinois law.

Whether your case requires negotiation or litigation, the Carlson Bier team possesses both the expertise and skill to handle intricate details of your case. We pursue maximum compensation for clients often exceeding their initial expectations.

It is worth noting that as personal injury attorneys, we operate on a contingency fee basis meaning you don’t pay any legal fees unless we successful in recovering damages for you. This allows our clients to focus on healing without having to worry about accumulating legal bills during what is undoubtedly a difficult period in their life.

Our commitment here at Carlson Bier is not only winning cases but also providing effective representation for individuals who need it most; helping them navigate through such turbulent times whilst commanding the utmost respect and dignity throughout.

A pedestrian accident can be daunting and the subsequent legal procedures may seem intimidating, but with an experienced team by your side like Carlson Bier, you are never alone. Let us help shoulder this burden as you concentrate on recovery and healing.

The depth of our compassion equals our drive towards success, making us steadfast against insurance companies who aim to undermine rightful claims—assuring optimal results for every client that entrusts Carlson Bier with their claim.

Wondering how much your case could be worth? Click on the button below! Trust in our experience and dedication towards securing justice—leave no room for uncertainty concerning your claim’s potential value. After all, there’s more at stake than just compensation—it’s about regaining control over your life after such a traumatic incident. With Carlson Bier beside you—we commit to serving your best interests first above everything else+S17:D17.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Joliet Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Joliet

Areas of Practice in Joliet

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering skilled legal assistance for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal representation for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Fall Mishaps

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Providing legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents secure fair compensation for harms and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering expert legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Building Collisions

Committed to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in delivering expert legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Committed to defending individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440