...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Kansas

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with a dog bite injury in Kansas, it’s crucial to seek swift legal support to navigate your potential claim effectively. Carlson Bier has an impeccable reputation for handling personal injury cases, particularly those involving canine bites. With our extensive knowledge of the nuanced laws surrounding such injuries and years of practice, we offer an unmatched professional service that puts client satisfaction at the core. Our approach centers around a comprehensive understanding of each unique case and ensuring our clients feel informed throughout this challenging time. None compares when it comes to representing victims who suffered from unprovoked dog attacks – from negotiating compensations that cover medical expenses to emotional trauma claims due to scarring or disfigurement arising from the incident. We’re committed not simply in winning your case but also in aiding you rebuild after severe distressing experiences like these because at Carlson Bier, you are not just another case number; you are family.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Kansas Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law – because your safety matters. Every day, we assist our clients through the complexities of Illinois law when they’ve suffered injuries due to others’ negligence. With a notable focus on Dog Bite Injuries, we’re here not only as attorneys but also as educators to help you understand your rights and legal recourse options.

Dog bites can be traumatic experiences with severe physical and emotional consequences stretching beyond mere momentary pain or fright. From a legal perspective, if you have been injured by another person’s dog, it’s crucial to know that Illinois follows what is known as ‘strict liability theory’. What this means is that even if the dog has never bitten anyone before, the owner remains legally responsible for any damages caused.

Clinically speaking, a dog bite injury could lead to many challenges such as:

– Potential infections like rabies or tetanus

– Permanent scarring or disfigurement

– Psychological trauma

– Pain and suffering

– Loss of income due to medical treatments

Understanding some key facets about these cases underlines why expert legal guidance is so critical:

• In statute ILCS 5/16-1 it states that the ‘owner shall be liable in civil damages for any injuries occasioned by such animal’, meaning you have every right to pursue compensation for your injuries.

• The ‘One-Bite Rule’ does not apply in Illinois; thus owners cannot avoid culpability claiming their pet never bit anyone previously or showed aggressive tendencies.

• The identity of the dog owner must be established. If there was negligence on part of the owner leading up to the event (such as leaving doors open), it strengthens your case further.

We at Carlson Bier believe empowering our clients with knowledge fosters better awareness during these challenging situations. Our dedicated team gives nothing short of personalized attention necessary for effective advocacy and negotiation efforts in securing rightful compensation.

Working together with us ensures you can expect comprehensive assistance, right from gathering evidence to dealing with insurance companies and courtroom litigation if needed. We adeptly employ legal strategies essential for maximizing settlement amounts, effectively negotiating on your behalf so you can focus entirely on recovery.

Our firm’s guidance isn’t just limited to the legal fight for compensation; we also help deciphering medical bills or filing for disability benefits. Given our comprehensive understanding of the medical industry and its intricacies, we ensure clients are not left disadvantaged by complex billing systems.

When it comes down to fees, any apprehension is eliminated with our ‘No Win, No Fee’ policy. Simply put, unless we recover a good deal of compensation for you, no professional fee will be charged.

An important factor when choosing personal injury attorneys is local knowledge and experience, Carlson Bier proudly possesses both. Being well-acquainted with Illinois laws like statutes of limitations that apply in such claims makes us stand out as reliable counselors able make a difference in your case results.

Going one step beyond just providing support through claims handling and recovery process after dog bite injuries – we educate about ways of prevention too. Because at Carson Bier, your well-being remains top priority which extends beyond gaining justice to preventing harm before it occurs.

On this journey toward justice & claim recovery following traumatic experiences such as Dog Bite Injuries- rest assured Carlson Bier accompanies each step of the way.

Understanding your rights can change the game entirely – transform victims into survivors who’ve rightfully claimed what they’re owed by law without being twisted in knots due their lack of expert knowledge or emotional state post-trauma.

Go ahead… click below.

Discover how much your case could potentially be worth under careful supervision from experienced Personal Injury Lawyers committed towards safeguarding your interests exclusively.

Because YOU matter every step along this challenging journey…And so does ensuring you receive rightful justice without unnecessary compromises at Carlson Bier: Your partners in empowerment through enlightenment under Illinois law.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kansas Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Kansas

Areas of Practice in Kansas

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing specialist legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering specialist legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Adept in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for harms and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Incident

Ensuring professional legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Impairments

Committed to extending compassionate legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Expert in assisting clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​