Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Kenilworth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have experienced dog bite injuries in Kenilworth, Carlson Bier is the optimal choice for legal guidance. With a strong commitment to ensuring clients receive due compensation, our personal injury attorneys are immensely experienced in navigating the complexities of Illinois law related to such incidents. Dog bites can lead to both physical and emotional trauma including surgical procedures, rehabilitation therapy, counseling services and potential lost wages as a result. Therefore having dedicated legal representation from Carlson Bier on your side is crucial. In each case we handle, we deploy strategic tactics that leverage state laws effectively protecting client’s rights while holding the responsible parties accountable through diligent litigation procedures or negotiation settlement talks executed with utmost professionalism and expertise. Trust us at Carlson Bier when it comes to adeptly handling dog bite injury cases; our success record speaks for itself reinforcing why victims choose us consistently.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Kenilworth Illinois

When it comes to defending your rights in a dog bite injury case, trust the experienced team at Carlson Bier. Our personal injury attorneys, based right here in Illinois, wield an unrivaled understanding of both the emotional and physical trauma that can follow an unprovoked dog attack. With meticulous attention to detail coupled with aggressive representation, we strive to deliver justice for those who have suffered such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bites are not minor concerns by any means. For further clarification on this matter, we’ve illuminated the key aspects of dog bite injuries below.

• A wide range of injuries: Dog bites can result in various types of physical harm, from superficial skin damage to serious conditions like nerve and muscle damage or even fractures. At times these encounters could lead to psychological damages – such as PTSD due to the traumatic nature of a severe animal attack.

• High medical bills: The costs stemming from visits to emergency rooms, surgeries coupled with ongoing therapy and treatments for potential infections or diseases transmitted during a bite incident can be dauntingly high. We understand how financially stressful this could be and our mission is aimed at justifying these expenditures through proper legal justice.

• Liability in Illinois: Under Illinois law based on strict liability statute (510 ILCS 5/15), regardless of whether or not a creature was known previously as potentially dangerous, its owner remains liable for all damages their pet might inflict upon another person without being provoked.

Understanding these complexities surrounding dog bite injuries is crucial to frame a strong case against offending parties who failed to curb their pets from causing harm unto others.

At Carlson Bier Group, we specialize in weaving together these intricacies into compelling narratives that would resonate assertively within courtrooms and mediation talks alike thus ensuring you acquire rightful compensation for your suffering enduring through no fault of yours. Every client entrusted onto us receives undeterred legal support throughout their ordeal along with constant communication regarding progress updates about their respective cases

We’re well aware that no amount of monetary compensation could erase the hardship you’ve undergone but what it can provide is a semblance of security – financial or otherwise for your recovery. Seamless medical care, therapy sessions and other expenditures necessary for full recuperation are often beyond affordability without worthy reimbursements extracted rightfully from liable parties.

And here comes our crucial role as warriors battling for your rights relentlessly. We understand that acquiring true justice involves establishing beyond doubt the severity of your injuries –physical and emotional alike–, the negligence or lapse on part of dog owners and matched ardently with a thorough understanding of Illinois’s stringent dog bite injury laws.

We take pride in bearing an extensive record flooded with successful claims acquired triumphantly against negligent pet owners across Illinois serving as testimonials to our rigorous advocacy ensuring maximum attainable compensation.

Now we embrace this opportunity to extend our services unto you thereby providing stability during such trials stemming from unfortunate events like these, both emotionally and financially. Our first priority will always be your welfare while battling for deserved justice on legal frontiers remains as imperative mandate upon us; Carlson Bier, your definitive choice amidst personal injury attorneys in Illinois.

As we strive to bring value to you in educating about dog face injuries, it’s crucial to remember that every case bears its unique circumstances thus rendering generic advice far inadequate rather than proper one-to-one consult addressing each distinct concerns associated within specific cases alongside guiding effectively throughout each step engulfing personal injury lawsuits.

Keeping this mind, why not let us review your case by availing free initial consultation right away? Click the button below and find out how much your case could be worth! As Carlson Bier Group gives priority above all else toward achieving rightful justice merited by distress inflicted through irresponsible breaches arising from negligent pet ownerships alike. Assess today itself about where does exactly your distinctive claim stands within legislative spectrum governing under strict liability laws throughout families dwelling peacefully across Illinois associations never having worried about risking unprovoked retaliations bestowed unjustifiably upon by pets owning around them.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kenilworth Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Kenilworth

Areas of Practice in Kenilworth

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering adept legal help for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Trip Accidents

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents secure fair recompense for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Ensuring specialist legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to offering professional legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in addressing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Committed to representing individuals with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer