FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Kenilworth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we are driven by our unwavering commitment to represent individuals suffering from spinal cord injuries. Our seasoned attorneys possess an in-depth understanding of Illinois law and medical complexities related to such debilitating injuries. We leverage this knowledge and experience to help you navigate through these traumatic times, fighting tirelessly for the just compensation you deserve.

In the heart of Kenilworth, incidents leading to severe spinal cord damage happen unexpectedly; automobile accidents, construction mishaps or recreational activities gone awry can change lives in an instant. With resilient advocacy and deep-seated compassion for clients whose lives have been upturned due to unfortunate circumstances, Carlson Bier relentlessly champions your rights.

Our team makes a thorough evaluation of case intricacies ensuring all factors contributing towards injury severity are considered when building a compelling claim on your behalf. This comprehensive approach invariably leads us toward securing optimal outcomes for our deserving clients.

When seeking skillful legal representation following a debilitating spinal cord injury within Kenilworth’s jurisdiction – look no further than Carlson Bier. Rely upon our dedicated firm’s expertise as we strive diligently toward rectification – allowing you reprieve and restoration amidst adversity.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Kenilworth Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of dedicated and experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois with a comprehensive understanding of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs). We strive to empower our clients and readers with detailed educational content that not only presents complicated legalities in every day language but also offers real value. A spinal cord injury can be an incredibly traumatic experience —physically, emotionally, and financially— and navigating the law around this can often become exceedingly complex. By simplifying these complexities, our aim is to make you an informed decision-maker where your case is concerned.

A spinal cord injury largely results from a violent blow or cut to the spine. While sometimes the evidence may appear abundant as to who is at fault for such incidents leading to SCIs, it is key to bear in mind that assigning legal responsibility requires far more scrutiny than what meets the eye. Our expertise lies in detailing all possible scenarios for establishing liability like recklessness, intentional actions or complete accidents; how each comes with its unique set of considerations under Illinois Law; considering insurance coverages which cross paths here; culminating into your rightful compensation claim.

• Recklessness: This considers instances where someone has acted without due caution despite being aware of potential risks.

• Intentional Action: Falls under criminal conduct wherein damage was consciously caused.

• Accident: Purely unintentional occurrences whereby no explicit fault can be assigned.

As part of addressing financial implications post-SCI, damages awarded generally cover medical costs including emergencies, surgeries and rehabilitation alongside psychological counselling if needed. However they also account for other factors:

• Loss of income: Current employment disruption as well as future earning impairments

• Pain suffering: Physical discomfort along with emotional distress

• Lifestyle changes: Costs incurred relating to modifications essential for life adjustments.

Given the immense repercussions SCIs have on individuals’ lives coupled with prolonged durations these cases usually entail makes it crucial to choose a law firm that you not only trust implicitly but which is equally adept at managing these in an empathetic yet effective manner. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in.

Transparency is our bedrock and we aim to keep you abreast with your case’s progress every step of the way. Our style of working also asserts absolute dominance over pushing for insurance settlements prematurely even when exploration stages are incomplete- much contrary to industry conventions. So while we ensure that compensation claims are fair, comprehensive – accounting for everything from incurred medical costs, lost salaries, lifestyle adjustments needed post-injury recovery— they most importantly reflect what YOU truly deserve!

At this point, it’s incredibly easy to feel overwhelmed by the sheer wave of information and potential life-altering choices required of you, as you battle – both legally and personally – against SCI repercussions. But remember clear-headed decisions can only stem from being well-informed about your legal rights first. And here at Carlson Bier we promise just that – informed-decision making power –aimed directly at helping build your confidence back up while assuring rightful justice! So whether it concerns accumulating evidence frameworks round recklessness/accident chargesingly complex.’

Take deliberate control over your SCI litigation story today by understanding precisely how much value your claim carries under Illinois Law. Simply click on the button below and let us guide you towards unlocking your deserving compensation estimate instantly! Trust us — because at Carlson bier victims aren’t just cases…they’re people!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kenilworth Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Kenilworth

Areas of Practice in Kenilworth

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering specialist legal help for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering professional legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Tumble Incidents

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents secure just remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing adept legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Specializing in delivering professional legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Injury

Specializing in supporting victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440