FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Kenwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Victims of severe dog-bite injuries know that the journey toward recovery is often long, frustrating and fraught with unforeseen complications. Recognizing this hardship, Carlson Bier serves tirelessly as your committed advocate for Dog Bite Injuries legal representation in Illinois. Our experienced attorneys firmly believe that compensation should cover more than just immediate medical expenses; it must also address ongoing care needs, psychological trauma, lost wages and diminished quality of life. At Carlson Bier, we work diligently to ensure victims are not left struggling financially after an unfortunate incident. We pride ourselves on our commitment to thorough investigation ensuring you receive the maximum reimbursement possible under Illinois law without overstepping any boundaries unlike some competitors who make false location claims. With dedicated lawyers at Carlson Bier working for you; financial stress becomes a thing of the past while obtaining justice remains our present pursuit.. Choose integrity – retain us as your top consideration for masterful guidance through your Dog Bite Injury legal process.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Kenwood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are well-versed in the complexities of personal injury law, especially when it comes to dog bite injuries. A traumatic experience like a dog bite can be both physically and emotionally devastating. If you or a loved one has been wounded following an incident in Illinois, we are here to provide comprehensive guidance and aggressive representation.

We understand that following a bit, you may find yourself battling medical expenses and emotional trauma; these circumstances foster our dedication to serving victims with knowledge-backed counsel yielding top-tier results. Dog bites can precipitate complex legal concerns involving ownership accountability, leash laws, breed restrictions, just to name a few. Hence, engaging the services of experienced attorneys such as ourselves at Carlson Bier is essential.

Delving into specifics about Dog Bite Injuries – They range from minor punctures or scratches to severe tissue damage and infections. However seemingly insignificant a bite might initially seem it’s crucial to immediately pursue medical attention post-bite since infection risks due to bacteria present in dogs’ mouths exist.

• One imperative statute prospective clients need to be familiar with is the Illinois Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5/16). This ordinance dictates that pet owners have full responsibility for their animal’s actions. Thus irrespective if its’ your first occurrence or your pet hasn’t been previously violent–owners remain liable for any harm their pets inflict.

• Furthermore, leash law violations contribute relevantly in several cases where unleashed dogs attack individuals walking by innocently going about their everyday lives; these victims possess rights under general personal injury laws warranting compensation for their suffering consequently from another’s negligence.

Our innate industry knowledge empowers clients endorsing mechanisms necessary during filing claims process after enduring dog bite injuries:

1.Post-injury: Seek immediate professional healthcare assistance regardless of bite severity.

2.Documentation: Capture pictures of wounds prior to receiving treatment–including torn clothes/blood stains etc.–crucial evidence backing claim strength.

3.Identification: Ascertain the dog and its owner’s identity as far and broadly possible.

4.Witnesses: Acquire names/contact information of individuals witnessing this incident.

Our firm, Carlson Bier, might not be physically located in Kenwood—but our seasoned team handles cases across Illinois—extending legal expertise with effectiveness matching any personal injury lawyer’s.

Developing a strong case usually involves compiling adequate proofs to facilitate negotiations with the owner or their insurance company; complex processes which you don’t have to maneuver alone. Our dog bite attorneys specialize in proving owners’ liability for attack injuries, holding them accountable as per Illinois statutes facilitating rightful compensation recovery for your undue grievances.

Dealing directly with insurers requires comprehensive understanding of claim settlement negotiation intricacies mandating acquired knowledge over many years. At Carlson Bier we are adept at analyzing cases while being client-sensitive regarding communication during these challenging times – ensuring that each step resonates clarity among clients related to their claims’ progress without adding an ounce of additional pressure on already stressed shoulders. With us by your side, rest assured that every facet will be thoughtfully pointed out including lost earnings potential post-incident if mandatory treatment leaves you unable to work.

A final note left untouched often constitute comparative negligence discussions–a situation where lawyers prove victims did not entice or harass dogs leading up to the event: crucial aspects determining damages rewarded in such instances. Complicated scenarios may arise during these suits but our dedicated attorneys remain primed to highlight significant points affecting your rightful entitlements positively.

At Carlson Bier, entrenched value lies in aiding distressed clients stand tall against negligent pet owners’ actions imposing life-altering repercussions through no fault of yours. Since it is both our duty and commitment lending expert advice plus steadfast representation—we invite you now towards exploring fair compensation possibilities awaiting a click away…Find out how much your case is worth today using our user-friendly feature below expediting initial assessments customized personally for you. Rest assured that at Carlson Bier we’re consistently reinvesting in ourselves, honing our legal skillset ensuring clients receive the best possible service–put us on your side and let’s relentlessly strive for justice together.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kenwood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Kenwood

Areas of Practice in Kenwood

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying specialist legal assistance for patients of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending professional legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Slip Mishaps

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents obtain fair settlement for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Delivering adept legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Traumas

Committed to extending compassionate legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​