FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Kinmundy

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to securing your rights in the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, Carlson Bier can be counted on as a formidable ally. Based in Illinois, our skilled team’s adeptness and knowledge go beyond geographical boundaries. With years under our belt representing victims involved in pedestrian accidents we bring experience-backed legal expertise to every case examined. The intricate Illinois law nuances associated with pedestrian accidents are well-understood by us at Carlson Bier, thereby offering you excellent representation tailored to your situation without loss flow or context no matter where the incident occurred.

Our dedicated attorneys work tirelessly employing strategic approach ensuring optimal results for each client. We engage one-on-one attention examining accident-related details thoroughly – road conditions, driver behavior and compliance with traffic laws- hence obviating possibilities of compromised claims.We offer extensive support navigating through insurance negotiations post-pedestrian accident too.

Remain assured that your personal injury claim is being managed by an experienced hand when onboard with Carlson Bier; We strive towards smooth resolution whilst bearing foremost the interest of clients like yourself who entrust us their needs.

Choose excellence over compromise when selecting legal help post a Pedestrian Accident; choose Carson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Kinmundy Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating effect of a pedestrian accident. As one of Illinois’ leading personal injury law firms, every day, our team witnesses the profound impact these incidents have on people’s lives. Pedestrian accidents are often sudden and unexpected, causing severe physical injuries and emotional trauma. However, if you or someone you care about has been involved in such an event, it’s important to remember that legal protections exist to safeguard your rights.

In Illinois alone, recent reports suggest that pedestrians account for approximately 14% of all traffic-related fatalities and around 24% of serious traffic-related injuries. This overwhelming number underscores how crucial our mandate is – to bring justice for those wrongfully injured in pedestrian accidents.

Understanding liability in these cases can be complex as a variety of factors come into play–driver negligence is often a significant component; however, few others might include:

• Lack of proper signage

• Faulty traffic control devices

• Poorly maintained roadways

When working with Carlson Bier, you’re not merely hiring attorneys; instead you’re enlisting an empathetic team dedicated to understanding the nuances specific to your case and tenaciously pursuing your best interests.

Let’s evaluate ‘why’ establishing drivers’ negligence could be vital: Typically this necessitates proving four elements:

1) Duty: The offending driver had a duty not to harm another person under established practices.

2) Breach: The driver breached this duty by failing to act reasonably—in other words—negligence.

3) Causation: The breach directly caused injuries.

4) Damages: The victim suffered verifiable losses (physical harm, emotional anguish).

Beyond this list though could hide several intricate legal concepts nuanced case-specifically hence navigating a claim alone becomes challenging plus is detrimental since it allows insurance companies an opportunity to undervalue your worth justifiably owed!

We also investigate possible city/county liability because improper signage, lack of crosswalks or failure to correct known dangerous intersections potentially translates into government’s responsibility. Ensuring all legal landscapes are thoroughly canvassed isn’t easy; it demands an experienced team that Carlson Bier proudly comprises.

Now perception might suggest fighting a case could be overwhelming emotionally and financially. Here’s the good news: At Carlson Bier, we offer services on a “contingency fee” basis meaning if your case doesn’t win, there’ll be no fees!

Therefore while you recover from the aftermath of such an unfortunate incident you face right now, rest assured our capable team is relentlessly working hard turn every stone to unearth evidence ensuring success for your pursuit in seeking due justice by obtaining rightful compensation rightfully bestowed over these guilty parties without causing undue burden upon you throughout this journey.

Remember PAIN is real but so is HOPE – That claim you’ve wondered if it exists; its RIGHT HERE at Carlson Bier where beyond establishing just evidence-based existence we transform it into a winning fight! So click that button below NOW and get started with learning exactly how much could rightfully belong within your hand-of-control as rightly deserved compensation for your pain gracefully borne yet undeservingly imposed!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kinmundy Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Kinmundy

Areas of Practice in Kinmundy

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Offering specialist legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering expert legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Tumble Accidents

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain just remuneration for harms and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending expert legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Committed to ensuring expert legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Focused on supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​