FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Kirkland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one have suffered from dog bite injuries in Kirkland, seek expert legal advice immediately. The law office of Carlson Bier specializes in these types of personal injury cases and is more than equipped to advocate on your behalf against responsible parties. Committed to ensuring that innocent victims secure justice, our services at Carlson Bier include investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident and substantiating claims for emotional distress, medical expenses, lost wages amongst others as allowed by Illinois law. The team adopts a compassionate yet strategic approach when dealing with such sensitive matters; we understand the physical and mental anguish dog bite victims endure. More than this understanding, our attorneys possess the experience necessary to navigate complicated legal processes successfully – making us an unmatched ally during your time of need. Make no mistake about it: Carlson Bier is dedicated not only to fighting but winning your dog bite claim wherever within Illinois it may arise – be that even here in Kirkland.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Kirkland Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be shocking and traumatic events, wreaking havoc not only physically but emotionally as well. At Carlson Bier, our team of dedicated and experienced personal injury attorneys understands the gravity of such incidents and is committed to helping you obtain a fair recompense for your ordeal. Our Illinois-based legal representation provides comprehensive coverage on all aspects related to dog bite injuries.

Firstly, it’s paramount to mention that under Illinois’ Animal Control Act, the owner of an animal is liable for injuries caused by their pet unprovoked. It doesn’t matter if the animal displayed prior aggressive tendencies or not; what matters is your safety had been compromised due to a dog owner’s negligence. This law was instituted expressly in respect of victims like yourself and designed as a recourse to secure justice for occurred harm.

Secondly, dog bites can lead to multiple types of damages which Carlson Bier consistently strives over ensuring full compensation for. As per our experience with past cases, these typically include:

– Medical Expenses: The cost of ER visits, surgeries (if any), medication prescriptions, future related treatments.

– Psychological Trauma: Post-traumatic stress after a dog bite incident could have lasting mental/frustrations requiring therapy or counseling sessions.

– Loss of Earning Capacity: If the injury impairs your ability to perform in workplace effectively leading towards job loss or wage reductions.

– Pain & Suffering: Non-economic damages that account for physical pain/emotional distress experienced due post-injury period are compensable too.

At Carlson Bier we adopt exhaustive methods into calculating true costs incurred during these outrageous circumstances ensuring justice is served righteously.

Furthermore, it should also be noted that Assembly Bill 588 mandates stipulation on “dangerous” dogs mandating owners take additional precautions inclusive but not confined towards maintaining liability insurance relating injury claims. Dog leash laws are strictly enforced while failure complying them verifies breach responsibility resulting in beneficial evidence supporting your claim.

Preventing dog bites is a shared responsibility. We advocate for educational initiatives promoting responsible pet ownership, safe human-dog interactions and general public safety awareness regarding potential risks/circumstances that can lead to dog attacks.

Evidence collection post an unfortunate incident as this becomes inordinately crucial strengthening your case too. For instance; securing the contact details of the involved parties/witnesses, documenting injuries with photographic proof, maintaining comprehensive records medical expenses/services received during the aftermath of incident will augment your legal stance further. An accurately filed police/animal control report serves as powerful testimonial support as well.

In summary, Carlson Bier’s cadre of personal injury attorneys are experts at managing cases involving dog bite injuries not because we have dealt plentiful before but because every single time – victim’s justice remains our core focus channelizing efforts best possible way representing their interests proficiently so they do not feel isolated/burdened fighting battles alone.

Moreover, we function strictly under contingent-fee basis which means you owe us nothing until we win or settle your case successfully ensuring affordable access to high-quality legal representation especially when it matters most – post traumatic periods such these where financial burdens could mount unanticipatedly yet swiftly without warning.

Finally, while browsing through this page you may have got a sense of our firm’s expertise related matters pertaining dog bite injuries but might still be guessing about the worthiness / specifics of your own case likely wondering “how much my case is actually worth?”. Well guess what?! – You do not have to anymore… Click on the button below NOW letting experienced personal injury attorneys from Carlson Bier evaluate each unique aspect of your situation carefully providing all required information enabling you make informed decisions moving forward beyond struggles faced today into brighter promising tomorrow!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Kirkland Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Kirkland

Areas of Practice in Kirkland

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Extending expert legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Ensuring expert legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Stumble Accidents

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents secure equitable compensation for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Incident

Providing experienced legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Committed to ensuring expert legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to representing clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440