...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Kirkwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking resolution for Dog Bite Injuries, it’s vital to choose the right legal representation. Carlson Bier stands as a top choice for such cases in Illinois, specializing in personal injury law and proven expertise with dog bite incidents. Our experienced attorneys realize that these injuries are often severe; causing significant physical pain, emotional trauma, and financial hardships. At Carlson Bier we approach every case uniquely; understanding the complexities involved when dealing with opposing counsel or insurance companies. We are committed to helping you secure fair compensation– medical costs, lost wages and other related expenses should not be your worry during recovery time. While our goal is swift resolution through negotiation first, we’re prepared to fight aggressively on your behalf if required—all while maintaining state laws’ abidance including those specific about cities like Kirkwood where our services can extend legally.

So why choose anyone else? Choose dedicated experience for justice – choose Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Kirkwood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, as a reputable Illinois Personal Injury Law Firm, we deeply understand the significance of being well-informed about different types of personal injuries. One such injury that may not frequently cross our minds but has significant legal implications is a dog bite injury. A startling fact to consider is that nearly 4.7 million dog bites occur in the United States each year, and from these cases, one out of every five results in infections that require medical treatments. With this high frequency, it becomes crucial for individuals to be familiarized with their rights and requirements under Illinois law.

Dog bite injuries can range anywhere from minor nips to catastrophic attacks, potentially causing severe moral and physical harm along with potential irreversible trauma. Understanding the ramifications accurately plays an integral role in ensuring victims are appropriately compensated for their pain, medical expenses, loss of income among other damages suffered due to these unfortunate incidents.

Time is precious following such unfortunate events:

• Immediate Medical Attention: The first point on your agenda should invariably be seeking professional medical care irrespective of the severity degree.

• Documentation: Make sure you promptly document details like cause of attack, animal owner’s information(if available), witness account (if possible), etc.

• Legal Consultation: Get legal guidance without delay as this could significantly impact your claim’s successful management.

Under Illinois’ strict liability laws regarding dog bites – if a dog or any other pet attacks an individual when he/she is lawfully present at the incident location—without any prior provocation—the pet’s owner holds sole responsibility unless there exists a valid defense against said claim. It means that even if they were unaware of their pet’s violent propensities or had taken necessary precautions against foreseeable harm—the onus rests squarely upon them once an attack occurs.

However also keep note :

• Being illegally present on private property where said attack occurs absolves the animal’s owner from liability

• Victim’s contributory negligence i.e., any action on their part that could’ve potentially provoked the animal can reduce or even dismiss any potential claims

Prior proven provocation by said victim leads to ‘Comparative Negligence’ enforcement—where a reduction in compensation equals their percentage of fault. What’s interesting to note is that Illinois does not limit its dog bite injury laws only to bites—an owner can be held liable when their pet causes injuries through other actions (e.g., a jump that results in an injury).

Our law firm specializes in interpreting these specific state rules while providing aggressive representation for our clients. We are adept at handling various complexities associated with aggression cases, ensuring all pertinent issues integral to consolidating your claim are covered. Our adept team will work rigorously, assessing all aspects of your case for securing maximum accessible damages—from past/future medical bills arising due to this unforeseen situation and income loss to psychological injuries as PTSD.

Dog bite litigation calls for expertise—you don’t just need a personal injury lawyer — you need lawyers possessing a robust understanding of this niche within Illinois’ legal framework—it’s what we at Carlson Bier offer and excel.

To navigate these complex waters efficiently, comprehensive awareness remains crucial—and reading information available online is beneficial—but remember it doesn’t substitute personalized legal advice from seasoned professionals duly qualified in battling out intricacies of such nature. Not knowing precisely what sort of damages one could claim or how certain defenses can impact—that’s where active professional guidance separates those reaping justice from those left wanting.

Wondering about the possible value your unique case may hold? Herein lies invaluable assistance—a simple click below opens up seamlessly tailored insights into your current position amid this tumultuous period . Let us fight fangs with facts—experience peace-of-mind via specialist consultation guiding residents stand firmly against irresponsible pet owners through swift appropriate action as mandated by Illinois’ stringent personal liability statutes.You deserve full-fledged advocacy armed with experience echoing righteousness – discovering tangible route towards justice has never been easier. Click the button below to unearth personalized evaluation—entering committed resilience for upholding basic rights, today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Kirkwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Kirkwood

Areas of Practice in Kirkwood

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing skilled legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing expert legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Injuries

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Big Rig Incident

Offering specialist legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on extending expert legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Trauma

Focused on assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer